Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil:prospective study

xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/323/7322/1155

 

BMJ 2001;323:1155-1158 ( 17 November )

Papers

Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study

See also editorial by Johanson and Newburn

Joseph E Potter, professor, a Elza Berquó, professor, b Ignez H O Perpétuo, professor, c Ondina Fachel Leal, professor, d Kristine Hopkins, research associate, a Marta Rovery Souza, researcher, b Maria Célia de Carvalho Formiga, researcher. e

a University of Texas at Austin, Population Research Center, 1800 Main Building, Austin, TX 78712, USA, b University of Campinas, Nucleus for Population Studies, Caixa Postal 6166, Campinas, SP 13081-970, Brazil, c Federal University of Minas Gerais, CEDEPLAR, 832 Rua Curitiba, MG 30170-120, Brazil, d Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Postgraduate Program in Social Anthropology, Avenue Bento Goncalves 9500, Porto Alegre, RS 91509-500, Brazil, e Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Department of Statistics, Caixa Postal 1615, Natal, RN 59072-970, Brazil

Correspondence to: J Potter joe@prc.utexas.edu

Objective: To assess and compare the preferences of pregnant women in the public and private sector regarding delivery in Brazil.
Design: Face to face structured interviews with women who were interviewed early in pregnancy, about one month before the due date, and about one month post partum.
Setting: Four cities in Brazil.
Participants: 1612 pregnant women: 1093 public patients and 519 private patients.
Main outcome measures: Rates of delivery by caesarean section in public and private institutions; women's preferences for delivery; timing of decision to perform caesarean section.
Results: 1136 women completed all three interviews; 476 women were lost to follow up (376 public patients and 100 private patients). Despite large differences in the rates of caesarean section in the two sectors (222/717 (31%) among public patients and 302/419 (72%) among private patients) there were no significant differences in preferences between the two groups. In both antenatal interviews, 70-80% in both sectors said they would prefer to deliver vaginally. In a large proportion of cases (237/502) caesarean delivery was decided on before admission: 48/207 (23%) in women in the public sector and 189/295 (64%) in women in the private sector.
Conclusions: The large difference in the rates of caesarean sections in women in the public and private sectors is due to more unwanted caesarean sections among private patients rather than to a difference in preferences for delivery. High or rising rates of caesarean sections do not necessarily reflect demand for surgical delivery.


What is already known on this topic
In Brazil, one quarter of all women deliver in the private sector

The rate of caesarean deliveries in the private sector is extremely high (70%) and more than twice that in the public sector, where rates have recently fallen due to a new policy

Previous studies in which women were interviewed after birth showed that a substantial proportion of private patients who have caesarean sections would have preferred normal delivery

What this study adds
In two antenatal interviews, preferences regarding type of delivery were nearly identical among public and private patients and strongly favoured vaginal births

Contrary to popular belief, middle and upper class women in Brazil do not want to deliver by caesarean section



 

© BMJ 2001

Rapid Response responses to this article:

Read all Rapid Response responses

A change of public opinion about caesaren sections in Brazil

Luis G. A. Quadros, Researcher, Gynaecology Department , Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

bmj.com, 16 Nov 2001 [Response]

From the Wall Street Journal about c-sections in Brazil

Leilah McCracken, childbirth researcher, writer , Vancouver, Canada V5Z 2B6

bmj.com, 16 Nov 2001 [Response]

Related editorials in BMJ:

Promoting normality in childbirth.

Richard Johanson and Mary Newburn
BMJ 2001 323: 1142-1143. [Full text]  

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.