http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/304/business/Model_health_law_empowers_states+.shtml
Model health law empowers states
Drugs, quarantine could be forced
By Bloomberg News,, 10/31/2001
The model law, commissioned by the US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, also would give people the right to appeal states' decisions to
quarantine or isolate them. Individuals with contagious diseases, such as
smallpox, wouldn't be able to appeal orders for treatment or vaccination under
the law.
State governments are concerned that laws are inadequate to address new
kinds of public health threats such as the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on
buildings in New York and Washington or the use of germ or chemical weapons.
Fifteen Americans have been infected with anthrax, a deadly bacterial disease,
and thousands more are taking antibiotics as a precaution.
Lawrence Gostin, chief author of the model law and a professor at Georgetown
University Law Center, said the academic panel that drafted the proposal tried
to balance the need to control disease with individuals' civil rights -
something he said isn't done under many current state laws.
''We felt if we were too Draconian and didn't respect people's rights, that
meant the terrorists would win,'' Gostin said.
Emergency powers allow governors to suspend normal government temporarily,
letting states swiftly address disease epidemics or natural disasters such as
earthquakes. Legal and public health experts at Georgetown University and Johns
Hopkins University examined all states' emergency-powers laws in crafting the
model.
Under the model law, states could quarantine or isolate individuals who are
infected with a contagious disease, though the patients would have the right to
appeal that decision in court. The patient would remain quarantined or isolated
until the appeals process was exhausted, Gostin said.
Patients could be forced to take medicines or receive vaccines for
contagious diseases that pose a public health threat, such as smallpox, under
the model law. Patients wouldn't be allowed to appeal a state's decision,
though the state would likely quarantine anyone who refused to comply,
triggering an appeals process, Gostin said.
States would avoid civil liberties violations if they enact laws that spell
out penalties such as the loss of public benefits, instead of incarceration,
for patients who refuse treatment, said R. Alta Charo, a professor at the
University of Wisconsin Law School.
This story ran on page D4 of the
Boston Globe on 10/31/2001.
© Copyright
2001 Globe Newspaper Company.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.