http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7323/1204/b

 

BMJ 2001;323:1204 ( 24 November )

News

Johns Hopkins admits scientist used Indian patients as guinea pigs

Ganapati Mudur, New Delhi

The Johns Hopkins University has admitted that a staff scientist collaborated with Indian doctors to test an experimental cancer drug in Indian patients without establishing its safety through animal tests.

The university announced last week that it had initiated sanctions against the scientist for participating in clinical trials that did not meet the university's standards for human research.

The scientist had provided the drug to doctors at the Regional Cancer Centre in India's southern state of Kerala. The doctors injected it into 26 patients with oral cancer between November 1999 and April 2000.

The university declined to name the scientist involved in the trial, but doctors at the publicly funded cancer centre have named Ru Chih Huang, a professor of biology at the university, as their collaborator.

Earlier this year a radiobiologist at the centre had accused his colleagues of breaching ethics by conducting an unauthorised clinical trial on unapproved drugs without appropriate consent (11 August, p 299).

The charges by Dr V Narayan Bhattathiri that patients in India were being used as "guinea pigs" had prompted the Indian health ministry and Johns Hopkins to launch independent investigations of the trials.

A committee appointed by the Indian health ministry has submitted its findings to the government, but its report has not been made public. The health ministry had said that it would order a change in the institutional ethics review panel at the centre.

Senior doctors at the centre declined to comment on whether any other clinical trials have been ordered to stop. "The attitude now is to just forget that it ever happened," said Dr Bhattathiri. "There are lessons to be learnt from this episode," he said.

Health authorities in India have expressed concern that the country's large pool of patients, trained medical researchers, and lack of strict laws to govern clinical trials make it an attractive site to test new drugs.

The Johns Hopkins University committee said that there was inadequate safety testing of the drugs (synthetic derivatives of a plant product called nordihydroguaiaretic acid) in animals before they were injected into human patients. It also confirmed Dr Bhattathiri's claims that consent forms used to recruit patients were inadequate.

The university has barred its scientist from serving as principal investigator on any future research involving human subjects.


© BMJ 2001

PDF of this article

Email this article to a friend

Send a response to this article

Electronic responses to this article

PubMed citation

Related articles in PubMed

Download to Citation Manager

Search Medline for articles by:
Mudur, G.

Alert me when:
New articles cite this article

Collections under which this article appears:
Research and publication ethics

Rapid Response responses to this article:

Read all Rapid Response responses

More Whistle Blowers Needed !

Prof K.R. Sethuraman. MD, PGDHE.,, Professor of Medicine , JIPMER, Pondicherry, India

bmj.com, 22 Nov 2001 [Response]

Indian Patients as Guinea pigs.

Dr.MS Basharuthulla,MD.,FACP,FRCP.Ire,FRCP.Glasg., Consultant Physician & Cardiologist/Clinical Tutor , Adan Hospital Kuwait

bmj.com, 23 Nov 2001 [Response]

patients of third world- who cares

Dr Akhtar Sherin, Medical Officer Khyber Teaching Hospital , Peshawar NWFP Pakistan

bmj.com, 23 Nov 2001 [Response]

Drug studies and tragedies in India

Romesh Khardori, MB.,MD.,FACP, Professor-Director: Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Molecular Medicine , Southern Illinois University School of Medicine;801 N. Rutrledge; Springfield, IL 62794-9636

bmj.com, 24 Nov 2001 [Response]



ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.