xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7323/1206/c
BMJ 2001;323:1206 ( 24 November )
News roundup
Bacteria killer found in sweat
Deborah Josefson San Francisco
Human sweat is capable of warding off more than potential friends and
lovers.
Researchers at Eberhard-Karls University in Tübingen, Germany, have isolated
a new antibiotic, dubbed dermcidin, which is secreted in sweat and may serve as
a first line of defence against microbial pathogens.
Dermcidins structure differs from known antibiotics and may kill
micro-organisms by a different mechanism. The work has been published in the
online edition of Nature Immunology (www.nature.com/ni) in advance of
the print edition.
Dr Birgit Schittek and her colleagues from the universitys departments of
oncological dermatology, immunology, molecular biology, and genetics stumbled
serendipitously on the dermcidin gene while screening DNA libraries from
melanoma and naevus cell lines. They found a previously unidentified gene
sequence among the clones and decided to characterise it. The scientists
localised the gene to chromosome 12 and found it coded for a peptide whose
expression was limited to the skin.
Immunohistochemical and in situ hybridisation techniques showed that
expression is preferentially restricted to eccrine sweat glands and is found in
mucous cells of the sweat gland coil as well as in the secretory granules in
Golgis complex.
These findings suggested that the protein is secreted in sweat, so the team
tested perspiration for dermcidins presence. They isolated sweat protein fractions
taken from four volunteers and sequenced the resultant fractions. Among the
proteins isolated was a 47 kilodalton processed form of the dermcidin peptide.
As the size of the protein was similar to that of defensins, another group
of peptides secreted by skin cells that exhibit antimicrobial activity, the
researchers tested whether dermcidin also possessed such properties. It turned
out to be active against both gram positive and gram negative bacteria as well
as some against yeast species.
Dermcidin killed Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus
aureus, and Candida albicans. It was active at high salt
concentrations and the acidity range of human sweat, where it was present at
concentrations of 1-10 m g/ml. It was
active against E coli and E faecalis at a minimum inhibitory
concentration of 1 m g/ml and against S
aureus and C albicans at 10 m
g/ml. Incubation at this concentration killed all of the S aureus colonies
in only four hours. Bactericidal activity increased with dermcidin concentration
and time.
The team showed that dermcidin was killing the bacteria by testing the other
protein fractions derived from the sweat as controls. They found that these
components lacked antibiotic properties.
Dermcidins structure differs from known antibiotics and may represent a
previously unknown family of proteins with antimicrobial activity. Unlike the
defensins, which are made by keratinocytes in response to inflammation,
dermcidin is produced all the time and seems to be secreted constantly in
sweat. Moreover, the peptide has a negative charge whereas many known
antibiotics are positively charged and produce their antimicrobial effect by
punching pores into bacterial cell membranes.
Dr Schittek acknowledged that her team does not yet know how
dermcidin works. She suggested that "it probably plays a key role in the
innate immune responses of the skin" and speculated that differing levels
of dermcidin expression may have a role in patients with skin disorders such as
eczema and atopic dermatitis, as these patients get frequent skin infections.
The group plans to test dermcidin against various viruses to see if it also has
antiviral activity.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA,
AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR
OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING
MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN
IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN
CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.