
|
Free
Congress Commentary |
By
Paul M. Weyrich |
Another Conservative Gone Native
One of the saddest things I have witnessed over time
is when a decent conservative from out in the states comes to Washington and
then goes native. I saw it happen with Alaska's Governor Wally Hickel who was
appointed Secretary of the Interior by President Nixon in 1968. By 1970, Nixon
was passing the word that he would be happy if Hickel left his Administration.
He did.
President Reagan had his case of a governor going native. Jim Edwards of South
Carolina was thought to be as sound a conservative as there was out in the
states. He was brought to Washington by Reagan to be Secretary of Energy. It
wasn't long before Edwards had begun to advocate items on the agenda of the
bureaucrats. Reagan was said to be happy when he resigned.
It happened to Jimmy Carter, not surprisingly. Carter wanted conservatives in
charge of his Justice Department. Thus Griffin Bell was named Attorney General
and Peter Flaherty, the Mayor of Pittsburgh, was named Deputy Attorney General.
Flaherty had been a stand-up conservative in Pittsburgh. In fact in the 1980
contest for the U.S. Senate, Flaherty ran to the right on most issues of the
victorious Arlen Specter. But when Flaherty got to Washington, he reversed
himself on a number of key issues.
There are many other examples over the years which could be cited. The leading
candidate for the going native award for the Administration of George W. Bush
would appear to be former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson. Thompson was a
reformer in his home state. He was the pioneer governor in crusading for
welfare reform.
Thompson has done many questionable things since taking over from another
Wisconsinite, Donna Shalala, as Secretary of Health and Human Services. The
latest example of his going native is one of THE most troubling yet. And it is
an initiative that, unfortunately, has received very little attention.
Thompson is pushing something called the Model State Emergency Health Powers
Act. This is a piece of legislation which HHS wants every state legislature in
the nation to pass. And when an agency such as HHS pushes a piece of so-called
model legislation, it usually gets its way because word goes out that states
which adopt the bill will be eligible for additional dollars. Bingo. That is
the magic word. If this isn't stopped before most legislators go into session
at the first of the year, watch for this bill to be adopted all over the
nation.
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has done an analysis of the
legislation. ALEC says this model legislation being pushed by Thompson has been
developed with the assistance of the Centers For Disease Control, the National
Conference of State Legislatures-and by the way, ALEC was founded as a
counterweight to the far left leaning NCSL-the National Governor's Association,
the National Association of City and County Health Offices (another liberal
organization) and a number of other liberal bureaucratic groups.
ALEC says the bill has a number of very troubling provisions. Among other
things this model legislation grants governors broad authority to declare a
state of emergency given an occurrence or imminent threat of an illness or
health condition caused by a bio-terrorism epidemic or biological toxins; it allows
public health officials, among others, broad, unfettered access to personal
health information without patient consent; the bill requires pharmacists and
physicians to report "unusual" health patterns, including personal
information about persons exhibiting unusual health patterns; it grants public
health official broad quarantine powers and allows public health officials to
require medical examinations or vaccinations under penalty of committing a
misdemeanor offense; this model bill allows public health officials to seize
and control personal property and access to communications, and to engage in
any necessary rationing, quota-setting or price-fixing; it grants governors
exclusive power over the expenditure of funds appropriated for emergencies; the
legislation requires the development of a comprehensive plan to coordinate
attack response.
ALEC says this legislation, called MEHPA, strips individual and families of
their rights and liberties at the expense of government; it represents
unnecessary and duplicative legislation given existing state natural disaster
statutes. It, according to ALEC, provides a number of potential legal loopholes
for trial lawyers to extort. The bill grants overly sweeping takings rights to
the government. It also fails to consider the needs of individual states. It
consolidates broad power to public health officials, most of whom are
unelected.
The legislation erects barriers to states' ability to respond, slowing down
response times when there is an emergency. The legislation utilizes vague
language to define key concepts, including when an emergency can be declared.
The bill grants additional duplicative due process rights for quarantined
persons.
And it allows public health authorities to ration drugs and other items, but
does not specify the manner in which these items will be rationed. And finally,
says ALEC, this model legislation ignores the potential costs - both dollars
and human.
Does this sound like a bill that would be pushed by a conservative Republican?
Would Tommy Thompson have advocated these measures before the Wisconsin
legislature?
This legislation is a threat to our civil liberties. It must be exposed to the
light of day in the next month-and-a-half. If protests are sufficient, and if
conservative legislators in state legislatures are properly alerted, perhaps
there is a chance to beat back this monster.
Tommy Thompson, whom I have considered a friend for thirty years, should be
ashamed of himself for advocating this sort of Big Brother legislation. This is
not the Tommy Thompson we knew as a four-term governor of Wisconsin. This is
another conservative gone native.
Paul
Weyrich is president of the Free Congress Foundation.
|
Free Congress Foundation
|
Web Site
by Gen-X
Strategies |
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.