The state wants to get to know its public school children in
extraordinary detail, asking school districts under a little-known law
to provide personal information on students such as their mother's
maiden name for a new database.
The Ohio Department of Education said
the database will bring the state in line with federal guidelines
requiring increased accountability from schools.
But local school officials are worried that Ohio is infringing on
student and family privacy and does not need such personal information
to ensure classroom accountability.
The Statewide Student Identifier System is to set up an
identification number for all 1.8 million students in public schools.
Those in private schools would not be part of the system.
The education department has hired the PricewaterhouseCoopers
accounting firm to collect the student data and assign the
identification numbers.
To guard against duplication in assigning the numbers, the state
wants to know each student's Social Security number, eye color, mother's
maiden name, dates of immunizations and other personal details on a
43-item checklist.
Local districts will use the identification numbers to pass on the
students' academic records to the education department, including their
classes, their grades, and any disciplinary actions against them.
By law, the education department cannot have specific academic
details linked to students' names -- thus the need for the
identification numbers. PricewaterhouseCoopers, however, will
permanently maintain a database of student names and their personal
information.
``Ultimately, this will allow us to see what students need help and
what programs are effective, while at the same time keeping student
names private,'' said J.C. Benton, an education department spokesman.
The system also will help the state track student mobility and offer
districts more accurate data for their use in planning, Benton said.
Akron's questions
Akron school officials are suspicious of the state's motives, to say
the least. For example, they ask whether law enforcement officials could
use the database in criminal investigations (that's not likely, the
state says) and whether parents can object to the release of information
on their children (that's not an option so far).
The Akron officials say they will submit the student information --
under slight protest -- because they are required to do so by law. But
they call the database system troubling, especially at a time when
once-obscure crimes such as identity theft are on the rise. ``We are
concerned about confidentiality,'' said Diane Kennedy, the Akron
schools' director of information management.
Akron Superintendent Sylvester Small said: ``I think the general
public would be outraged if they knew the type of information the state
was requiring on their kids.''
Akron school board member Linda Kersker said collecting so much
personal information on so many people in one database increases the
likelihood of its misuse.
The school board was surprised to learn about the information request
this week when Small brought it to their attention as a requirement the
district has to meet by April 30. Small said even he only recently
learned of the law.
Other districts worried
Kennedy, who has attended meetings in Columbus about collecting
student data, said officials of other urban districts in Ohio are just
as concerned about the system.
This year, the state requires that only some of the information
requested in the 43-item list be provided. But Small said the number of
required items will increase each year.
Akron has agreed to submit only this year's mandatory information.
That's nine items, including name, address, date of birth, gender, race
and school.
By next year, the state will require such additional items as the
student's middle name and birthplace.
Some districts may choose to submit information that for now is
optional.
One expert in identity theft said that while the education department
might have a legitimate need for the information, it should assure the
public about how it plans to keep the data secure.
``My concern is all the people that are setting this up,'' said Jay
Foley of the Identity Theft Resource Center in California. ``Are they
seriously, seriously taking in all the dangers involved. That
information can be misused, maybe by a disgruntled worker.
``It's not so much that it is a bad idea -- it's `Are you aware of
the downfalls?' ''
Benton, the education department spokesman, said security has been
given a high priority in setting up the identification system. ``We have
been assured it's safer than submitting credit card information over the
Internet, and it is safer than using a cell phone,'' Benton said.
Akron school officials said the state has told them and officials in
other districts that if the personal data is improperly disseminated,
PricewaterhouseCoopers cannot be held accountable.
But Benton said that if the accounting firm mishandles the
information, it can be prosecuted.
Reginald Fields can be reached at 330-996-3743 or
rfields@thebeaconjournal.com