Adapted from the book Vaccination: What You MUST Know Before You Vaccinate
Your Dog, by Dr. Messonnier, published by Avery publishing.
When you get your reminder card this year from the veterinarian, letting you
know that it's time for your dog's annual "shots," it would be a good idea to
ask yourself and the doctor some important questions before proceeding. "Does
my dog really need shots again this year?" "Do I have any other options to keep
my dog protected against infectious diseases?" Can we do anything to protect my
pet against other health hazards as well?"
There is no question that annual immunization has decreased the number of
infectious diseases we see in our pet dogs. For the most part, illnesseslike
distemper and parvovirus are a thing of the past in many practices. Now
however, pet owners must question if annual immunizations are needed, and if
they might pose a risk to their dogs.
Many years ago, when infectious diseases were the number one cause of death
for both dogs and their owners, a regular series of immunizations was critical
to prevent early illness and death. And because infectious diseases can in
some cases
easily wipe out a majority of the population, it was important to maintain
immunity among most if not all members of the population.
Now however, we can control most infectious diseases quite adequately. This
means that while immunizations may still be important for your dog, we should
now concentrate our efforts on the problems currently challenging our pets'
health, such as cancer, heart disease, and diseases of the kidneys and liver.
These are the same health problems we face as well.
Many veterinarians are divided into 2 main "extremist" camps on this issue.
In one corner is the doctor who believes all pets should be immunized each year
for everything possible, period. Regardless of actual immunity or exposure to
infectious
organisms, this doctor doesn't want to change his ways without overwhelming
proof that changes need to be made.
In the opposite corner is the true naturopath who believes immunizations are
horrible poisons that are responsible for every disease under the sun, and is
opposed to any and all immunizations for any reason. This person would argue
that the risk of
contracting a serious or fatal infection in a healthy pet is far less likely
than the damage inflicted by toxic vaccinations administered to a pet which does
not need them. In other words, the danger inflicted by vaccines is worse than
any disease a dog could contract.
So what's the truth? Probably somewhere in between. Since most vaccines are
labelled for annual use (some are given every 6 months as in the case of the
Bordetella vaccine), simply changing our recommendations would be in direct
opposition to how our vaccines are labelled, opening up doctors to all sorts of
potential liability. Still, there is no doubt
that some vaccines may induce immunity in some dogs longer than the 12 month
period stated on the vaccine label. And of course, we don't want to overtreat
any pet with medication. If immunity may last longer than 12 months, why
over-immunize your pet and risk any side effects?
So then, how do you decide what to do this year when you receive that
reminder for you dog's immunizations? What is the most holistic answer to this
tough question?
While it has some flaws, I propose that dog owners consider having vaccine
titers checked each year to determine if immunizations are needed. These blood
tests are inexpensive (we charge $45) and are the only objective way to look at
a dog's antibody level against infectious diseases. The titers are mathematical
representations of the pet's antibody level.
While there is no definite agreed upon "correct level" for titers, in general,
titers of 1:128 or greater are considered protective (meaning further
vaccination is probably not warranted) and titers less than 1:128 are not
protective (indicating current immunization may be needed.)
These tests are easily run by most veterinarians. By running an annual
titer, your pet's doctor can work with you to make a decision regarding what
immunizations if any YOUR pet needs, rather than making a generic recommendation
based on the
"average" pet. Taking this approach in effect reaches a compromise between those
who say all pets should be immunized each year and those who are against
vaccination of adult pets. For those owners who elect not to have the titers
run, a decision will need to be made based upon a number of factors; usually,
the doctor will recommend annual immunization if he cannot determine your pet's
current immune status. By taking the truly holistic approach, it is possible to
fit health care recommendations to the needs of each pet. And regardless of
which approach you take, keep in mind that vaccinations are just one small part
of the whole health care picture. An annual physical examination, blood testing
to check for things like diabetes, thyroid disease, blood cancers, and kidney
and liver diseases are always more important than vaccinations since your dog is
most likely to die from these degenerative disorders than from infectious
diseases. It's time we start treating our dogs the way we treat ourselves.
Early diagnosis and treatment of those problems most likely to adversely affect
our beloved canine family members just makes good sense.
Dr.Shawn Messonnier is a nationally known veterinarian, author, and speaker.
He is the author of the Pet Care Naturally series of books published by Avery
publishing, fall of 1999. He is also the holistic health columnist for Dog Fancy
and Cat Fancy magazines.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"