Rich countries must not exploit poorer nations for research purposes
Zosia Kmietowicz London
Companies or organisations in wealthy countries that plan to carry out
research in developing countries should ensure that certain ethical standards
are in place before they go ahead with studies that may hold little value to
participants, warns the Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
In a report published this week the council advises developed nations to pay
special attention to how they plan to gain consent from the people they wish to
participate in trials. They need to take into account cultural considerations,
such as local customs and traditions, the standards of care available locally,
and what will happen to participants once the trial ends.
In the past some research projects have been criticised for exploiting
participants and failing to provide the same standard of care to everyone who
took part.
In 1997 a study in Thailand to test whether a short course of antiviral drugs
during pregnancy prevented the transmission of HIV from mothers to children was
condemned for giving the control group a placebo when it was already known that
a longer course of the drug zidovudine reduced transmission of the virus.
"It is critically important that the local social, cultural, and economic
context is taken into account when research is designed," said Dr Fred Binka, a
member of the working party that wrote the report. "There are concerns that
people in poorer countries will sometimes bear the risk of research while those
in wealthier countries receive the benefits."
There is a huge gap between rich and poor countries in peoples health
(figure), yet only 10% of the £35bn-40bn ($51bn-58bn; 57bn-65bn) spent on
health research each year is devoted to the health problems of 90% of the
worlds population, says the report.
Developing countries urgently need research into diseases such as
tuberculosis and malaria but lack much of the expertise to do it themselves,
hence the need for ethical investment in research from developed countries. "We
hope these recommendations will allow research to be conducted so that it has
the greatest chance of providing useful information, without risking
exploitation of vulnerable people," said Professor Sir Kenneth Calman, chairman
of the reports working party.
The Ethics of Research Related to Healthcare in Developing Countries
is accessible at the councils website at
www.nuffieldbioethics.org
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"