aking
sure medical records are kept private is a worthy goal, universally popular with
voters. But it has been far from a lay-down hand for the federal government. The
privacy debate has seesawed back and forth. The Clinton administration proposed
standards in 1999 that did not require patient consent for the routine exchange
of information in treatment or paying claims but did require written permission
for any disclosures beyond that. But after a barrage of complaints from privacy
advocates and others, the Clinton team flip-flopped the following year and
required patient consent for all disclosures, even among health care providers.
Now the Bush administration is preparing to flip back again, before the rules
take effect next April. The Bush proposal would allow doctors, hospitals,
pharmacists and other health care providers to disclose patient information to
one another for treatment, payment of claims or certain business operations,
without obtaining consent. Written permission would be required, however, for
any purposes beyond that. Thus information could not be disclosed without
permission to employers, life and disability insurers, marketing firms, banks or
anyone else not engaged in caring for the patient or paying for it.
That strikes us as a reasonable place to draw the line on this issue.
Patients are far more worried about information seeping out of the health care
system than about health professionals' communicating among themselves. With the
health system under enormous financial strain, this is no time to be adding
additional costs and legal or bureaucratic burdens. It seems enough, as the
administration proposes, to provide patients with a statement of the health
provider's policy on sharing medical information and let any patients who are
dissatisfied either negotiate changes or go elsewhere.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"