CDC proposal is extreme
Fri Apr 26, 6:15 AM ET
Duane Parde
State legislators are making vigilant provisions just in case Osama bin
Laden (news
-
web sites)'s next cowardly shoe to drop is a biological, chemical or
nuclear attack. Thirty-three states are considering legislation to prepare
for such attacks. For this they should be heartily applauded. But such
legislation must also stand scrutiny in respect to civil liberties.
One controversial proposal, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (news
-
web sites)'s Model Emergency Health Powers Act, is rightfully viewed as
an unprecedented legislative assault upon civil liberties. The CDC proposal
allows governors to unilaterally declare a public health emergency,
stripping individuals and families of their rights and liberties for 60
days. Only then is a state legislature allowed to intervene by a majority
vote.
Following a governor's emergency declaration, unelected state health
officials immediately assume broad powers to seize property, share your
private health information, quarantine individuals suspected of being
infected, ration goods and services, compel mass vaccinations and even
assume control over state and local police. The potential for blunder borne
out of incompetence is enormous, not to mention the potential for willful
abuse.
The medical community and business owners have the most to fear. Under a
declared state of emergency, hospitals could be procured, through
''condemnation or otherwise,'' by anyone who meets whatever constitutes a
public health authority. The owner of a fleet of school buses, for example,
could have his property expropriated without compensation to transport
infected people, animals or waste. Private homes, businesses or our schools
could be walled off as quarantine locations. And there is not one thing
anyone could do about it for 60 days.
If one set out to intentionally legislate extremism, the CDC model would
be it. Unlike Illinois, Pennsylvania and Maryland, not every state has
introduced the most extreme version of the bill. At the very least, each
state and its citizens should scrutinize every word of legislation being
considered. If states go too far, they hand the terrorists of the world a
belated victory.
Duane Parde is executive director of the American Legislative Exchange
Council, a bipartisan organization of state legislators. |