A Victory for Life and Truth

©Copyright 2000 by Joel Black

(Explore Issue: Volume 10, Number 1)

Dr. Sam Chachoua defeats Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in an American Federal Court. The jury awarded this Australian doctor over $10,000,000 in damages after hearing of the conspiracy to suppress and destroy him and his new field of medicine described as promising to be “THE MOST EFFECTIVE THERAPY AGAINST CANCER AND AIDS IN HISTORY.” NBC NEWS (AUGUST, 2000)

The Verdict
August 11, 2000

After eight days of trial and two days of jury deliberation, a milestone in legal justice was achieved. The people spoke in a Los Angeles federal court and their voice rocked a system that had thought itself invincible.

For days, the panel of eight had heard of suppression of a new technology against AIDS, cancer, heart disease and other terminal illnesses. They heard and saw remarkable successes: individuals who had struggled in the face of death and reclaimed their life and well being. The eight-member jury witnessed the incredible results of testing at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Thirty-six vaccines were presented, almost all of which were more than 99% effective against AIDS. It is a new promise that offered both prevention and treatment of this modern plague—an answer to so many prayers and dreams. Then suddenly there was public denial and suppression by the very institute that had achieved these incredible results. Massive attacks were launched to destroy the inventor both physically and in the press and a cover up was begun to deny mankind of what Cedars itself had once described as an “exciting new world of therapeutic opportunity!”

Hope was stolen and dreams were shattered. Cedars-Sinai had refused to acknowledge their own results and failed to return the original prime source material to the inventor so that his work could continue. They further engaged in activities to discredit him and destroy his reputation in a campaign that spanned the globe and severely limited his ability to continue or even publish his work.

The number of lives affected and the number of lives lost to AIDS alone during this four year struggle moved one witness to exclaim that Cedars had committed “premeditated manslaughter.” A ten million-dollar verdict suggests that the jury agreed.

The Struggle

Major institutes can be an overwhelming force for good when they function as they are intended to. The same power, wielded for evil and deceit, can destroy a researcher, deny his patients continued therapy and keep real hope from the masses.

For years, Dr. Chachoua lived under a constant barrage of slander and denial that had tainted his credibility and would have destroyed any lesser man. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center had not only refused to return his sera and cultures, they denied ever having any relationship with him. They issued press releases denying any association with him and therefore labeling their own results as fake.

All avenues and agencies that could damage this man were explored at a time when he was pleading with them to continue the work so that mankind would benefit. Cedars allied themselves with a group that was claiming to be providing his vaccines to the public but selling tap water instead, to victims at its Mexican clinic and throughout the United States. Dr. Chachoua had been battling this group, legally, yet the group was not above gross lies, vulgar slander, and bribery of officials and attempted murder.

The writer does not wish to extend the fifteen minutes of fame these maggots have already enjoyed, so he will not refer to them by name but he has seen a videotape where they lament that attempts on Dr. Chachoua’s life had so far failed.

Cedars took the ‘high ground’—a simple liaison with UCLA to deny any relationship with Dr. Chachoua and labeling him a charlatan. Their attacks always appeared through official, political and media channels. Even an assemblyman was recruited on their behalf to influence the plaintiff’s former attorneys to drop the lawsuit against Cedars-Sinai. The associates that they supported with press releases and confidential documents regarding Dr. Chachoua and those they sought out in written correspondence to help them with the Chachoua problem were not limited to any civilized tactics.

Dr. Chachoua endured physical attacks and fell victim to corrupted lawyers and government officials. Documents were forged to implicate him in deception; Mexican immigration officials were paid to detain him and threaten him. A media frenzy started by and based on the denial of his existence in any capacity by Cedars-Sinai, denounced him as a charlatan and gave voice to associates who defamed him with lies and vulgar slander.

Each situation was met and defeated by the young doctor. He would not allow a Mexican clinic to lure victims by using his name in their advertisements so he fought them into bankruptcy. The lawyer who provided him with documents faked at the request of his adversaries is now looking at jail time. An entire delegation of immigration officials in Mexico was removed from office after being found guilty of violating his human rights. They now face criminal action. Even faced with the medical monoliths Cedars-Sinai and UCLA, Dr. Chachoua would not back down. “It is not just for my own life that I am fighting,” he explained.

What is it that fueled this man? How could he triumph against a system so stacked against him? What were his motivations and how did he generate the power and determination to bring establishment to its knees?

To better understand this modern day David and Goliath saga one must return many years in the past.

The Beginning

As a young boy, Sam Chachoua realized the limitations of modern medicine in a cruel manner that we all are familiar with. His father was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, a cancer of the bone marrow. The disease progressed over several years, resisting chemotherapy and radiation. With every new drug that was tried, hope would be raised only to be rapidly shattered as the cancer progressed relentlessly.

Even in the seventies, cancer breakthroughs were announced almost on a weekly basis. How then could this great industry of medical science prove so impotent in the treatment of cancer? How could a young teenager fathom, let alone compete with conventional modes of cancer therapy? He was smart enough to know that he could not and that his work would have to involve avenues never before explored. He looked for signs of promise from natural phenomena and situations—the cancer resistance of certain organs, the ability of some to defeat this disease. An unexplored pathway promised undiscovered hope. He was not motivated by personal fame or by the vast fortunes that feed the cancer industry. His was a mission fueled by his heart.

The Interview

A freelance reporter interviewed Dr. Chachoua last year. It was a particularly difficult period in his life where letters published by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center had been used to shatter his credibility and paint him as a fraud. His work was almost brought to a standstill as this mighty institute used its influence to intimidate and persuade other researchers, institutes and foundations to avoid working with the good doctor. His will was unfazed, his determination steady. His pain was at the tragic loss of life taking place during this suppression. The oppression was felt in his soul.

Dr. Chachoua managed a small smile, “At this point it seems that everything has come to a sad ending...but the last chapter has not yet been written. This technology cannot be allowed to disappear...people must be given this chance at life...as bad as things look right now, a sad ending can also be just an unfinished story...”

Sam Chachoua might someday deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as Dr. Louis Pasteur or Dr. Fleming, the discoverer of penicillin. But for now, Chachoua, (pronounced ‘Cha-choo-wa’) a brilliant doctor and medical researcher who has made great strides in discovering potential cures for cancer, AIDS and heart disease, is fighting seemingly insurmountable odds in attempting to get his story told and his findings accepted. Instead of encouraging and helping to further fund the research that has led to the discovery of his amazingly successful vaccines, the major medical establishments have turned their collective backs on this Egyptian born, Australian educated doctor. Driven by profoundly personal reasons to eradicate the diseases that have been mankind’s scourge, Chachoua must instead devote his energies to fighting back against those who should support him most, while at the same time attempting to repair his reputation in the medical community. The tangled tale of his scientific discoveries, successful application of vaccines on human patients, and eventual betrayal by parasites he encountered is almost beyond belief. However, as this complex case continues to be unraveled by this nation’s legal system, the court documents available indicate that every word of the following story is true.

As a child growing up in Australia in the 70s, Sam Chachoua loved and respected his father, a preeminent local physician. Like most children, he saw his father as an indestructible hero who could overcome all obstacles. The single most traumatic incident in young Sam’s life occurred when his father was diagnosed with terminal cancer, and modern medicine proved ineffective in combating the disease. He philosophized about his deepest beliefs many years later in his book, The Challenge, The Promise, The Cure. “Every child has dreams and aspirations, major contributions to make, marks to be left, fame to be found, and what feels like an eternity in which to accomplish these objectives,” writes Chachoua. “Curing cancer, growing up to be a hero, saving mankind, these must be some of the commonest fantasies of the young. Impossible tasks seem achievable because there is so much time; time to study, time to grow, time to prepare. Time allows for attainable fantasies, for pleasant dreams. When age or situation shortens time, when there is a need for rapid realization of the dream, reality destroys fantasies. Dreams are either abandoned or are often transformed into tangible despair that mourns the loss by cutting more harshly than reality ever could.”

After standard therapies proved ineffective in preventing his father’s death, Sam became disillusioned with modern medicine and determined to devote his professional efforts to improve treatment for those suffering from incurable illness. A penetrating mind and indomitable will to succeed propelled Sam towards academic excellence. He developed and presented an original paper on cancer treatment at the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia at the age of 18, the youngest such presenter in the Society’s history. He completed his medical training with honors, picking up a physics medal in the process. Most importantly, as his research began in earnest, he began to develop a wide range of non-toxic and spectacularly effective therapies for a host of different ailments. Chachoua refused to believe that cancer was an unbeatable foe and an unforgiving killer nor that the disease was unstoppable, uncontrollable and irreversible. He eschewed the typical modern treatments whereby patients of similar ages, size and cancer type are treated with the same tried and failed protocols. Instead he chose to concentrate on individual evaluation, care and therapy. Fascinated by spontaneous remission, the doctor hoped to control and perhaps replicate these occasional “miracles,” where a dying patient suddenly recovers, and the disease melts away as if in answer to a prayer. Researchers knew cancer cells can be destroyed or even turned back into healthy cells by certain infections, fluctuations in temperature, magnetic fields, hormones, chemicals, changes in environment, and primitive immune responses, among other reasons. But little time and money were devoted to investigating these phenomena. The majority of cancer research funds are directed to poison and other “therapeutic” agents.

Dr. Chachoua searched for non-toxic biological agents that could duplicate the findings in spontaneous remissions. He developed a range of antisera, vaccines and microbiological extracts that could target the cause of the disease and remove it from the body. In cancer, AIDS, and other conditions where the body cannot recognize or adequately deal with the disease, he developed “tagging agents” that could stick to the body of the disease, allowing it to be seen and then eliminated by the body’s immune response. In short, if a cancer cell can be made to look like a cold or flu, by “tagging” it with cold or flu fragments, then the body will eliminate it as it would a common infection. Perhaps the most dramatic capacity of this technology is its ability to repair cellular damage at the genetic level; purifying infected cells from HIV, regenerating hepatitis damaged livers, scarred heart tissue and even atrophied brain tissue in Alzheimer’s patients.

Graphic Proof

Figure 1. Represents a cell in structural distress carrying a very heavy viral load. Virus can been seen as small dark particles throughout the cytoplasm. This cell was representative of a field isolated by flow cytometry. Amazingly the patient on protease inhibitors had an undetectable PCR count. Other patients with PCR levels over 200,000 had fewer intracellular viral particles and more efficient immune response bringing to doubt the validity of common techniques employed to diagnose and evaluate the progress of this disease.

Some Answers

As HIV molds intricately into the fiber of our DNA no cure will be complete until this genetic aberration is corrected. Toxic modalities may encourage mutation and accelerate disease progress. The Induced Remission Therapies being presented here in preliminary communication, seeks not to destroy viral mechanisms but to use them to displace the virus from its genetic locus. Genetic and other fragments originating from the patients own cells and/or non-pathogenic organism are used to eliminate the virus from its nuclear and cytoplasmic habitat. Many of these vaccines, by using the viruses own reverse transcriptase, insert themselves in the vicinity of the viral DNA, resulting in the latter’s removal and expulsion. This represents a new age in AIDS therapeutics aimed at genetic editing and correction. These vaccines do not harbor toxic effects, are therapeutic as well as preventative and are not made from HIV or fragments thereof. (Thus eliminating the theoretical risk of contagion associated with HIV based vaccines.)

The following serial photography obtained at USC demonstrated the process. [See figures 2, 3, & 4 with captions.]

The Scientific Duplication of Miracles

Induced Remission Therapy is based on features and mechanisms of biological agents that render the disease immunologically visible, treat the cause and regenerate damage incurred during the illness.

By addressing the causes of disease, IRT brings about amazing healing responses in many illnesses including heart disease.

The two EKGs above represent improvement in R-wave progression indicating enhanced cardiac function after only two days of treatment. The patient’s triglycerides were slashed to one third of the previous abnormal level. Cholesterol and glucose levels also improved in this 50-year-old diabetic patient with a history of severe cardiac disease. The limitless scope of IRT includes inflammatory diseases, asthma, MS, lupus and chronic fatigue in addition to many other disorders.

The ability of Induced Remission Therapy to act at the genetic level leads to almost limitless applications. Success has been obtained with Arthritis, Lupus, Asthma, Psoriasis, Dementia, MS as well as a host of other diseases including cardiovascular disease. Hospital documentation verifies the return to normal function and disappearance of scar tissue as well as valve repair following treatment.

This next case is perhaps the most difficult to treat—liver cancer. Once cancer has reached the liver, metastasis from another location, it is very hard to treat. Fig. 7 is a slide of the liver. The smallcircled dot at the top, is a cyst the patient was born with. The other larger circle is cancer. This cancer was tagged with a staphylococcal infection using dead bacterial extracts, “which are harmless to the patient.” Fig. 8 shows the cancer is gone after only two weeks of treatment. As a proof that that is the same patient, fig. 2 shows the cyst the patient was born with and no trace of cancer.

Prostate Cancer

This next case presents (fig. 9) a 58-year-old male with prostate cancer metastases to ribs. Fig. 10 shows healed ribs after only three weeks of therapy.

This next case, fig. 11 shows multiple brain metastases from small cell carcinoma. Fig. 12 shows resolution after two months of therapy.

Fig.13 shows a CAT scan of a 22-year-old man with primary hepatoma perforating the hemidiaphram and encapsulating the right lung. In fig. 14, we see a CAT scan following six weeks of therapy showing elimination of cancer surrounding the lung.

This next case is a 32-year-old female who is a body builder, with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In fig. 15 the large white mass in the center is cancer. She received therapy for about a week. The patient has an X-ray taken after one week of treatment and the cancer is nearly gone (fig.16).

Chachoua’s Relative Anonymity

There are two major reasons why Dr. Sam Chachoua’s remarkable findings are virtually unknown to this day. The first reason has to do with his “outsider” status in the medical community, and the second is a series of misfortunes that have befallen him as a result of the rampant greed and opportunism that accompany any major new discovery. “Medical research is not a profession that yields financial comfort for any but a few leaders who are well placed both politically and within the university institutes,” explains Chachoua. “The systems exist within boundaries; researchers must be part of a major institute before their work can be readily published. Have you ever heard of a cancer breakthrough or other medical advancement that did not come from a university or a hospital’s PR machine?” Chachoua doesn’t fit any of the standard molds. He has developed his methods independently and has funded himself throughout the process. He didn’t beg or compete for financial grants, and this independence has allowed thought to mature to practical applications in dramatic fashion. Most research focuses on a minutia that never sees practical application, such as interesting laboratory findings or rare enzyme and gene configurations. By contrast, Chachoua’s work has made the gigantic leap through the lab and animal studies and right into successful human applications—all without the help of a university, hospital or pharmaceutical company. However, his freedom and independence came with a price tag attached. Without institute backing, publication in major journals was difficult. His young age and the enormous implications of his work further complicated the situation. The simple truth is that a lack of affiliation with major institutes limits publication opportunities, and the same institutes that monopolize the system frowns upon unpublished work. The doctor chose to combat this untenable situation by lecturing at medical conferences and public gatherings worldwide, not only presenting his findings to a larger audience, but even proposing to fund research and revalidation of his technology. Over the years, he has offered up to $500,000 in grants, an unprecedented offer for a researcher to pay for others to prove or disprove his work.

The second reason for Chachoua’s relative anonymity is a convoluted and ongoing tale that involves elements of treachery, deceit and betrayal. After reversing an advanced case of prostate cancer with his radical techniques, world renowned researchers at UCLA and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center approached Chachoua to test his vaccines against cancer and AIDS (USC and other major institutes would later be involved). Testing commenced in the fall of 1994, and the response from the medical community was extremely encouraging. “The data demonstrates profound inhibition of infection with many of the serum samples tested,” offered Eric Daar, MD, the Director of the AIDS & Immune Disorders Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Paul Terasaki, a Ph.D. and Professor of Surgery at UCLA School of Medicine, wrote that the tests provided “interesting results...larger scale experiments have been initiated.” Shlomo Melmed, MD, of the UCLA School of Medicine, suggested that Dr. Chachoua’s work represented an “exciting new world of therapeutic opportunity.”

As Chachoua’s reputation grew, the first hints of trouble began. A group of former acquaintances, associates and onetime supporters who had praised him for saving their lives, formed a clinic in Mexico. A woman named Suzanne Henig (an English teacher) was the ringleader of this nefarious operation, and she claimed that they owned Chachoua’s vaccines and technology. Henig and her henchmen, Ricardo Lopez, David Blake (Chachoua’s former attorney) and Jay Walker, are some of the names that appeared in brochures touting cures for cancer, AIDS and other diseases. They even used Dr. Chachoua’s name and videos of his lectures to recruit victims, charging thousands of dollars for useless products that often bore no resemblance whatsoever to the genuine vaccines. Henig would later admit in a court of law that she was selling simple distilled water as one of the “miracle cures.”

As he became aware of the scandal, Chachoua took urgent steps to shut down these clinics. Justice was swift, and the doctor was successful in having these renegade operations terminated. But the clinics would reopen under different names a short time later, only to be shut down again. Several of Henig’s patients died. There were numerous complaints to the Mexican government, but money continued to change hands and records disappeared. In early 1996, Chachoua was forced to file suit in the United States against the principals of the clinic and to warn the Mexican public about what was taking place. The backlash of his actions was both surprising and violent. Attacks on his home, his life and even his partner were, in retrospect, the actions of cornered animals who were threatened with the loss of a multimillion dollar enterprise. Suzanne Henig, exposed as a charlatan and a fake, nevertheless proved to be a worthy adversary in the courtroom. Under guidance from her Mexican attorneys, UCLA and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center issued statements including a “Denial of Relationship” with Chachoua. Their damning statements served to invalidate the spectacular test results achieved earlier and raised questions about Chachoua’s credibility.

Others might have crumbled and disappeared under the weight of such adversity. But at stake was the lives and well being of literally millions of sufferers, and Chachoua was determined that his research and efforts to thwart disease would continue forward. In Australia, an MBBS is the equivalent of an MD degree, but when doubts were raised in the courtroom about the validity of this medical degree, Chachoua spent more than $20,000 to obtain a Mexican revalidation of his Australian license. His intention was to show the Mexican and United States citizens a license they might better understand, but his attempts to provide clarity and comprehension caused him a tremendous setback. A traitorous Mexican attorney, Jaime Berger, hired by Chachoua to produce the new medical license, instead chose to stab the doctor squarely in the back. Suzanne Henig had surreptitiously paid off Berger to provide a false medical license and officials in Mexico Immigration detained Dr. Chachoua, in order to prevent him from completing his appearance in his San Diego lawsuit against her in the summer of 1997. For two days the doctor was denied food and water, threatened and attacked, but he managed to be released in time to appear and win the lawsuit. Henig cried that she was broke and dying. Dr. Chachoua never sought large financial damages but simply asked that the defendant cease her illegal activities. Judge Pate, biased by UCLA’s and Cedars support of Henig, suggested that the jury award the doctor only one dollar. This judge would then grant Henig an interview for publication while she (still claiming poverty) asked for reimbursement of $99,000 that she spent on the suit. She would then publish journals and finance international conferences over the next four years, while still claiming to be broke and dying.

With what seemed to be the Mexican immigration and legal system corrupted against him, Dr. Chachoua was advised to return home. Certainly, that would have been the easy option, but he refused to allow his name to be tainted. Berger had verified the authenticity of the Mexican license to at least three U.S. attorneys, and letters were revealed showing that immigration officials had received funds to detain the doctor while the plot was carried out. Chachoua fought all charges, and The Human Rights Committee found members of the Mexican Immigration office guilty of many violations, which led to the dismissal of a number of high-ranking officials. The doctor’s lawsuit against his former attorney, Berger, continues to this day. Chachoua was eventually found to be innocent of all charges, yet his enemies roam free and profit from the smear they initiated.

Dr. Sam Chachoua, a man who’s inventive and revolutionary research skills are surpassed only by his tenacity and dogged determination, continues to fight the medical monoliths to this day. It seems inconceivable that internationally renowned institutions like UCLA and Cedars-Sinai would deny knowledge of such powerful and potentially life altering research, but they continue to claim that they have no knowledge or relationship with the doctor that they themselves approached in 1994. For more than two years, Chachoua has been involved in litigation with both UCLA and Cedars-Sinai in an attempt to bring this technology to the public. His career is at a virtual standstill. All his energies are directed towards the validation and acknowledgment of his previous work, and he has neither the time nor the resources to build on the many exciting discoveries, which interested the medical institutions in the first place.

It appears at this juncture that there might have been a relationship or association between the American institutes and the charlatans in Mexico. Correspondence suggests that they shared patients, with perhaps both UCLA and Cedars giving credibility to experimental, illegal and ultimately useless products from Henig and accomplices. Whatever the association might be, it seems the American institutes were only too compliant in following the guidance of the Mexican quacks in issuing their attacks on Chachoua. They appear ready to deny all knowledge of him, and either bury or steal his technology. The question that cannot be answered is “Why?”

Dr. Chachoua has recently made it very easy to resolve the situation. If the court documents representing the incredible efficacy of Dr. Chachoua’s vaccines and the excitement of major researchers at UCLA and Cedars prior to their betrayal of Dr. Chachoua, including the chart of 20 out of 22 vaccines being more than 99% effective against HIV; if the letters from Melmed, Daar and Terasaki are untrue copies; and if the institutes really never tested his vaccines and technology, then he offers to pay them the sum of $10,000,000. If, on the other hand, these documents are real, he expects them to pay him $10,000,000. And, more importantly, he demands they explain their outrageous behavior to a public literally dying for the cures he has discovered. Dr. Chachoua has also demanded that his prime cultures be returned. Amazingly, Cedars has to date refused to return to Dr. Chachoua his own material.

Dr. Sam Chachoua’s vaccines are at a point of efficacy that is unmatched, but that still can be improved upon. Millions of dollars can be spent to raise their efficacy even further, resulting in a higher cure rate and eventual FDA approval. This radical technology promises to defeat so many aspects of death and can regenerate healthy tissue to an extent that might even impact our life span, but it is clearly beyond one man’s ability to finance and perfect. The world needs these cures, and Chachoua’s search for truth and validation must be supported. Our current medical system is geared to allow new products to be registered only by the powerful, wealthy enterprises whose income seems threatened by this man’s work. Should we continue to support entities with billions of dollars that are wasted in meaningless experiments, or should we divert our energy and support a technology that has already proven itself to be capable of “medical miracles” on numerous occasions? In a world full of increasingly complex choices, this seems to be one decision that should be easy to make.

Back To The Present

The previous article was prophetic. However, Cedars never responded to the ten million dollar challenge; the jury responded for them.

Dr. Chachoua was able to present some of his technology during the trial. The jury would hear of how he would develop tagging complexes (microbiological extracts from living cultures, which would attach to diseased cells and even organisms such as HIV and other diseases including cancer). These products would not only “light up the target for immune destruction” but would also genetically modify the cells so that damage would be corrected at the nuclear level. The results would be either suicide (or apoptosis), cellular normalization or immune destruction of a disease, which had been modified to look like an appetizing target. (With several disease conditions, the body cannot effectively deal with or eliminate the underlying pathology. The immune arm dedicated to it does not adequately contain cancer, and HIV actually feeds on the T-cells that challenge it. By changing the appearance at the cellular and nuclear level AIDS and cancer can be made to look strongly foreign and rejected from the body as material from an outside source, another species or common infection.) The defenses activated against the tagged disease are radically different and are more powerful than the standard human response. To further secure elimination of the target, Dr. Chachoua explained to the jury that the patients could also be provided with an immune response purified and matched to their bodies, which would overwhelm the tagged disease. In many patients, the human body becomes so depleted by illness that it necessitates not only the tagging of disease to make it more visible, but also the infusion of a powerful immune system to facilitate an immune recovery.

The cultures from which the tagging complexes were extracted have taken many years and a large amount of money to isolate. They were unique. The jury would also hear of how an effective immune response was searched for and identified for use against cancer and AIDS.

In his search for an adequate immune response and using similar logic to his search for prime cultures for his tagging agents, Dr. Chachoua tested and screened volumes of patients in search of any sign of improvement or resistance. His observations led him to believe that in cases of autoimmune disease, (diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and mixed connective tissue disease) the same immune response that attacks the patient’s own cells, had strong therapeutic potential. These patients would generate anti-sera which would penetrate cells without destroying them and which Dr. Chachoua hoped could be trained to remove HIV from the body of the cell and even neutralize viral or cancer genes at the DNA level, particularly in association with tagging complexes. It appeared that in autoimmune disease, the intra-cellular defense mechanisms were inactive (defense mechanisms within cells usually protected against mutation and infection.) In cancer and AIDS patients the cells inner defenses are failing. In autoimmune disease, enzymes designed to digest foreign invaders are deficient, so the body compensates by generating a unique immune response capable of entering the cell, correcting and defending it. This was Dr. Chachoua’s reasoning and an approach that remains both unique and unchallenged in brilliance and efficacy. It also stands alone as it provides a range of therapeutic goods that can both prevent and treat disease. Unlike other vaccines, Dr. Chachoua’s Induced Remission Therapy, (IRT) does not use the disease itself in its makeup. Both the difficulty and danger associated with cancer and HIV vaccines that use cancer or HIV in their structure is that even fragments of disease can be harmful and can promote mutation of disease. Dr. Chachoua’s therapies therefore have added safety.

Cedars-Sinai initially argued that Dr. Chachoua had not allowed them to carry out toxicity studies and that his vaccines could have been toxic and no more than bleach, to bring about the incredible laboratory results they saw. And yet the jury would see a toxicity test carried out by Cedars, which showed that at therapeutic doses not only was their no toxicity found but the number of healthy cells actually doubled when exposed to the vaccines. (This incredible regeneration capacity of the vaccine has helped in reversing damage from heart and neurological disease, even Alzheimer’s disease.) The jury would then hear from Cedars-Sinai that the technology was never tested on humans but then see letters from Cedars and hear their own witnesses testify that they had been presented with and impressed by Dr. Chachoua’s clinical successes on patients. They would shake their head in disbelief when they heard of how Cedars issued press releases denying any relationship with Dr. Chachoua. Then they manipulated the media into labeling him a charlatan based purely on their denial of him, and repeatedly interfered with his attempt to further his work at USC, Wayne State University and even Karolinska, (the Noble Prize Institute in Sweden.)

The jury was aghast when they learned that only six weeks after denying a relationship with Dr. Chachoua and destroying his credibility, the principle investigator from Cedars (who had tested Dr. Chachoua vaccines) co-authored and published a paper on the possibilities of the use of autoimmune sera from arthritis, lupus and mixed connective tissue diseases in the treatment of AIDS. Cedars had published a large part of Dr. Chachoua’s technology without crediting him.

In Federal court, therefore, Cedars’ attorneys had the difficult task of not only down playing their own letters of the profound results obtained, but also discrediting a technology that they themselves have published.

Cedars-Sinai repeatedly insulted the jury telling them that the vaccines were toxic, although the jury saw Cedars’ own letters and results attesting to the safety and efficacy of the therapy. In fact, the vaccines were so non-toxic that the researchers could not explain their profound inhibition of HIV. According to Cedars own testing, they were so non-toxic that the cell survival increased instead of decreasing and often doubled after exposure.

Cedars then attacked the technology as not being FDA approved, but the jury would learn of the Health Freedom Act and the Compassion Act, which allow for the use of non-FDA approved agents in the treatment of terminal patients. These vaccines further enjoyed a defined legal status outside of the United States and any American doctor can implement the technology itself legally if he wishes to. Having failed in these attacks, Cedars successfully argued that all data, experiments and evidence from other institutes should not be admitted as evidence since they were not relevant to this case. They would then argue to the jury that no other institute has ever tested Dr. Chachoua’s work—a smug deception as the jury would never see the volume of evidence relating to the successful human use and investigations carried out at other major institutes. That information was denied the jury in court as much as it was denied the public when Cedars and associates painted Dr. Chachoua a charlatan and claimed that all of the results (including their own) were fake.

The only results Cedars had to explain in court were their own, but how do you say that something is useless when your own tests show it to be more than 99% effective? How do you say something is toxic when your own data show incredible safety? How do you deny a technology when you yourself have attempted to steal and publish it?

A killing blow was still awaiting Cedars-Sinai. Dr. Chachoua had seen lawyers intimidated and corrupted during this trial. He knew much had been lost by legal negligence and what would later appear to be collusion. He felt that many of his proofs would be kept from the jury’s eyes, so he arranged for a patient with full-blown AIDS to be a witness.

Michael arrived. He had in his possession one dose of one of the most powerful vaccines that Cedars had tested but had refused to return Dr. Chachoua. (In the absence of the prime cultures, the sources of origin of many of these vaccines were entrusted to Cedars for storage and cataloging. Dr. Chachoua could produce no more of these vaccines but this last remaining dose may have achieved more for humanity and justice than any other medicine in history.)

The jury would hear of how Michael had deteriorated while taking protease inhibitors, “the medication that Cedars had presented to be all but a cure—a drug cocktail in use today.” The jury would hear how Michael’s T-cell count had deteriorated down to 124 within the last few days with massive increases in viral load. When asked how he felt, Michael replied, “Exceptionally well.” When asked why, he stated that he had taken a dose of Dr. Chachoua’s vaccine the day prior to testifying, and that his immune system had doubled. (His T-cells had risen to well over 200 and therefore in one day his status had changed from full-blown AIDS into a remission made temporary only by the lack of his ability of follow up therapy.)

“And how do you know that your immune system doubled?” asked Dr. Chachoua’s attorney? “I had several blood tests,” replied Michael. And where did you have these tests taken? “Cedars-Sinai Medical Center,” replied Michael.

The jury heard that a patient suffering from full-blown AIDS and receiving conventional cocktail therapy continued to deteriorate, as proven by tests at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center but was put into remission from full-blown AIDS by a single dose of vaccine again as proven by tests at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. The same institute which had tried so hard to destroy Dr. Chachoua had once again demonstrated and documented the incredible effects of his work before the jury and the world in the most dramatic moment in legal and medical history. The same people who had tried so hard to destroy the inventor of this research documented this.

The jury would also hear from Terry Dreyfus, the first patient in the world to achieve a two and a half year remission from full-blown AIDS by receiving Dr. Chachoua’s vaccines. He fell out of remission only when the therapeutic supply ran out, after Cedars refused to return Dr. Chachoua’s cultures. The jury would also be shocked to hear that Cedars had sent a detective to Terry’s home the day prior to trial. Cedars admitted this. The detective threatened and intimidated Terry in an attempt to keep him from testifying. The jury would hear of all this as well as of Cedars’ knowledge of Terry’s remission. After witnessing testimony from Mr. Dreyfus, a living miracle, and delighting with Michael over the news of his remission, it appeared that the jury then became numb to the lies of Cedars’ attorneys and repulsed by the ongoing suppression.

The jury deliberated for two days. Their verdict was unanimous.

Dr. Chachoua has developed a few new cultures. However, the tragedy of the loss of his most powerful vaccines will be felt for years to come. It will take time, money and the support of the public that has until now been kept in the dark to rediscover them.

The judgment awarded for over ten million dollars does not even begin to compensate for the lives that have been lost and will continue to be lost because of this travesty. Dr. Chachoua’s work can be salvaged. It is only a question of time, money and public support. If we only refuse to allow the truth to be silenced, if we focus our energy and support to this proven therapy then it can be quickly returned to us. The mechanisms of Induced Remission Therapy offer a future without disease and suffering. Dr. Chachoua has pledged every penny of the judgment and his every waking moment towards that goal. It is not a battle he should fight alone.

For further information and updates on the case with Cedars-Sinai Institute, including the $10 million dollar judgment award, please see the web site at: www.remissions.org

To receive an update on Dr. Sam Chachoua’s work, contact Explore!

[Back to Top]

To subscribe/order Explore Publications download our order form.