This is a local mailing I
get. It has a section where parents can respond in the mailing, but I
couldn't forward it b/c it would be an attachment and not sent. So here's
a copy of the article. While it is pro-vaccination, it is for the
philosophical exemption.
Nellie
STREETTALK
A SHOT IN THE DARK by Charlotte Lancaster
In one of the Texas legislature's more
paradoxical attempts to improve our lives, Representative Rick Green
(R-Dripping Springs) has introduced a bill that will make it easier for parents
to decline immunizations for their children. Mr. Green claims that the changes
he proposes will actually increase the number of children inoculated each year.
Strangely enough, he may be right. Under current
law, parents have only two options: either have your kids vaccinated against
everything, or refuse all inoculations completely (on religious grounds). As
approved by the Public Health Committee last week, HB 1702 allows parents to
select which vaccines their children receive. The bill also broadens the
exemption to allow for refusal on the grounds of "conscience," not
just a strict adherence to religious precepts.
Over the past two decades, concerns have arisen
about the overall safety of some childhood inoculations. Conditions such as
autism and multiple sclerosis have been tentatively linked to certain
vaccinations. In addition, champions of holistic medicine have questioned the
validity of vaccinating children against primarily adult diseases like
Hepatitis-B. The intended effect of HB 1702 is to have children receive at
least some of the inoculations recommended by the Texas Department of Health,
even if parents refuse a portion of them.
Naturally, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention in Atlanta disapproves of the proposal, maintaining that no medical
evidence proves that vaccinations cause afflictions, aside from the rare
allergic reaction. The CDC and other respected medical institutions stress the
dramatic improvement in children's health brought about by the current
immunization programs.
Given the choice, most parents will probably
still immunize their children against all diseases. However, removal of the
"all or nothing" provision of the state health code may get more kids
immunized in the long run.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA,
AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR
OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING
MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN
IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN
CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/