Letter from Professor Walter 0 Spitzer to the Sunday London Times
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
Letter from Professor Walter 0. SpitzerSunday Times May 27 2001http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/ Editor: In the course of travel in Europe, I read a
surprising headline in USA Today, Vaccine is off the hook as the cause of
autism. But panel wont dismiss possibility.(See 1. below) The two parts of the headline are contradictory. I had
just finished reading the 74-page Report of the Institute of Medicines
Immunization Safety Review Committee (the panel) released on 4-23-01. There was
nothing in the Report or its executive summary to justify such a headline in a
reliable national newspaper. I can only link the headlines .off the hook as
the cause of autism to a public statement of Dr. Marie McCormick, the
chairperson of the Committee. In the Institute of Medicine (IOM) press
conference she stated: it [MMR] is as safe as a vaccine can get (See 2. below) As
an individual evaluator, my view is that the IOM Report itself is 70% to 90%
correct in its descriptions of the evidence and in its judgments. The Report
concludes: .evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship at the
population level between MMR vaccine and autistic spectrum disorders.(See 3.
below) The foregoing is all based on lacking evidence. The Committee concedes that it could not .exclude
the possibility that MMR vaccine could contribute to ASD in a small number of
children..(See 3. below) What is a small number of children? If the number were 5%
of diagnosed autistics in any large developed country, that would be thousands
of persons. The Report recommends: Conduct further clinical and epidemiological
studies of sufficient rigor to identify risk factors and biological markers of
ASD.(See 4. below) I do not disagree with the Committees opinions as cited
except in degree. Expressed in simpler
but consistent language, the IOM Report reads as follows: We do not know
whether there is any link between MMR and any autistic disorder. The evidence
is inconclusive. More study is needed. I agree with the three conclusions. But
for McCormick to say in the releasing press conference, it is as safe as a
vaccine can get imputes the Chairs personal opinion to the Committee as a
whole. It is understandable that the lay press picked the wrong message from
the wrong source. As an epidemiologist
who has been a Member of the IOM since 1986, I have been proud of IOM reports
in my field that I have examined or co-authored. I am embarrassed by the
process of this latest Report and would urge President Shine of the IOM to
retract the Report until the message has been clarified. What was released, the IOM Report or the
McCormick Position? I am a worried
agnostic on the matter of MMR linked with autism just for reasons given by the
IOM Committee. . because .the proposed biological models linking MMR vaccine
to ASD, although far from established, are nevertheless not disproven.3 I
believe that immunization is the strongest pillar of public health and
prevention. I have no family members with ASD. I would be delighted if
effective MMR were also demonstrated to be safe in scientifically admissible
safety studies. But let that be the result of the kind of rigorous science that
has been called for by the IOM, not unsubstantiated exoneration of MMR by one
person. Walter O. Spitzer, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Epidemiology McGill University, Montreal, Canada 1. USA Today, April
24, 2001, p.1 2. Transcript of the
IOM press conference at which its Report was released, 4-23-01 - closing
remarks. 3. Stratton K et al
editors, Immunization Safety Review Committee, Institute of Medicine,
Measles-Mumps-Rubella and Autism [prepublication copy], National Academy Press,
Washington, DC, 2001, p.36 4. Ibid p. 46 ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
|