http://www.mercola.com/2002/mar/23/polio_vaccine.htm

FREE Weekly Health Newsletter

Your Email Address:

Read Past Issues

Issue 309

March 23, 2002

Omega-3 Fats Prevent Breast Cancer

Hypocrisy Oath

Let’s Vaccinate the Preemies

Polio Vaccine and Lymphoma

Companies Entice Physicians

Cord Clamp Injuries

New Mexico Lets Psychologists Give Meds

Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec

High Religious Commitment Linked to Less Suicide

Guide to Wholehearted Living

Chlorophyll is NOT the same as Hemoglobin

Home Page New Patients Nutrition Help  

Update on Polio Vaccine and Lymphoma


DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT:

Last issue I posted an article from Lancet showing that half of the 55,000 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the US are likely related to contaminated polio vaccine.

The researchers believed that the contaminated vaccine batches were cleared up in 1963. A reader forwarded me a peer reviewed journal article discussing the legal proceedings at Lederle that suggest otherwise.

I have posted the abstract of the article below:


To date, the scientific literature and research examining SV40 and cancer-related diseases has been based upon an assumption that SV40 was not present in any poliovirus vaccine administered in the United States and was removed from the killed polio vaccine by 1963.

The basis for this presumption has been that the regulations for live oral polio vaccine required that SV40 be removed from the seeds and monovalent pools ultimately produced in the manufacturing process.

The Division of Biologic Standards permitted an additional two tissue culture passages -- from three to five -- in order to allow manufacturers the ability to remove this contaminant from the oral poliovirus vaccines then awaiting licensure. The confirmation of the removal by one drug manufacturer, Lederle, has been made public at an international symposium in January 1997, where its representatives stated that all of Lederle's seeds had been tested and screened to assure that it was free from SV40 virus.

However, in litigation involving the Lederle oral polio vaccine, the manufacturer's internal documents failed to reveal such removal in all of the seeds. The absence of confirmatory testing of the seeds, as well as testimony of a Lederle manager, indicate that this claim of removal of SV40 and the testing for SV40 in all the seeds cannot be fully substantiated.

These legal documents and testimony indicate that the scientific community should not be content with prior assumptions that SV40 could not have been in the oral polio vaccine.

Only further investigation by outside scientific and independent researchers who can review the test results claimed in the January 1997 meeting and who can conduct their own independent evaluations by testing all the seeds and individual mono-valent pools will assure that SV40 has not been present in commercially sold oral poliovirus vaccine manufactured by Lederle.


Anticancer Res 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6C):4745-9

 


Return to Table of Contents #309

Home Page Health Articles Nutrition Help Newsletter   
©Copyright 1997-2002 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. This content may be copied in full, with copyright; contact; creation; and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.

Disclaimer - Newsletters are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola. They are not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and they are not intended as medical advice. They are intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional.

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.