http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/08/business/08PRES.html

New York Times Business
The New York Times
Home
Find a Job
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Nation Challenged
Politics
Business
- Media & Advertising
- World Business
- Your Money
- Markets
- Company Research
- Mutual Funds
- Stock Portfolio
- Columns
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
NYT Mobile
NYT Store
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Your Profile
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Newspaper
  Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Text Version
 
Tips Go to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, sandymint
E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles  
 

 

 

March 8, 2002
 

TV Ads Spur a Rise in Prescription Drug Sales

By MELODY PETERSEN

Topics

 Alerts
Drugs (Pharmaceuticals)
Medicine and Health
Marketing and Merchandising
Aged
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters
Other Resources
Get Stock Quotes
Look Up Symbols
 
Portfolio |  Company Research
U.S. Markets |  Int. Markets
Mutual Funds |  Bank Rates
Commodities & Currencies

Television advertising, aging baby boomers and the greater use of expensive new medications drove prescription drug sales up 17.9 percent last year, a study shows.

Over all, Americans paid about $208 billion last year for prescription drugs — almost double that spent in 1996, according to NDCHealth, a health care information company, which released the study yesterday in Manhattan.

But at the same time, drug companies slowed the rapid pace of some other promotional spending. The companies spent 6 percent more last year on sales representatives, consumer advertising and meetings with doctors, according to the study. In 2000, those promotional costs rose more than 19 percent and 234 percent in 1999.

"This is a very healthy industry," said Sheldon Silverberg, an expert on pharmaceutical companies at NDCHealth. "People are walking into doctors' offices after seeing commercials."

While the number of prescriptions also increased, total drug sales grew at a much faster pace because of price increases by manufacturers and greater use of expensive new medicines like Procrit and Epogen, injectable drugs for anemia that are produced through biotechnology.

Total prescriptions rose 6.6 percent, to 3.3 billion, last year — the equivalent of almost one prescription a month for every American, Mr. Silverberg said.

Prescriptions for antidepressants rose 10 percent, he said. More than seven million people took an antidepressant last year — up 700,000 from 2000. Some of those people may have started taking the drugs, Mr. Silverberg said, after Prozac lost its patent protection and a lower-priced version began to be sold.

The continuing rise of prescription drug costs is becoming an increasingly contentious issue in dozens of states struggling to pay for patients enrolled in Medicaid, and in Washington, where lawmakers are drafting legislation to add a prescription drug benefit to Medicare. Drug costs are also frustrating employers as health insurance premiums continue to rise.

To try to ease the concerns, four drug companies — Pfizer (news/quote), Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline (news/quote) and Novartis (news/quote) — recently created discount cards that allow low-income elderly people to get deep discounts on products.

But the companies continue to increase the number of consumer ads.

The pharmaceutical producers spent $2.8 billion last year on consumer advertising, according to Quintiles Informatics, a consulting firm — an increase of 12 percent. In 2000, consumer advertising increased 31.5 percent.

The most advertised drug last year was Celebrex, for arthritis, followed closely by Vioxx, its competitor. The next-highest advertising expenditures were to promote Allegra and Claritin, two allergy drugs, and Viagra. Pfizer has sharply increased advertising of Viagra because two new medicines for impotence, which will be the drug's first competitors, are nearing approval.

Most of the companies' marketing expenses go to pay their armies of sales representatives who visit doctors, nurses, hospitals and managed care companies. The industry had 81,600 sales representatives last year, according to Quintiles, an increase of 45 percent since 1998.

Mr. Silverberg said the drug companies were increasingly inviting doctors to meetings, dinners and other events where their products are promoted. The companies held 370,300 meetings and events for doctors last year — an increase of almost 18 percent.

"Doctors continue to get the lion's share" of the money spent to promote medicines, Mr. Silverberg said.



 
Home | Back to Business | Search | Help Back to Top



 

E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles  


 


 
Advertiser Links

Find More Low Fares!
Experience Orbitz!




$7 Trades, 148 offices,
No fee IRAs, #1 Broker


 

Reprints & Permissions Click here to order Reprints or Permissions of this Article

Click Here to receive an introductory offer to The New York Times Electronic Edition.


 

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.