|
Report:
Immunologists rethink allergy's hygiene hypothesis
Investigator: Bengt Björkstén
Thursday Mar 14th, 2002
by Bea Perks
Studies of babies growing up in Estonia and
Sweden, together with data from germ-free mice, indicate that allergy is
the result of an unregulated, rather than a biased, immune system. The
conclusion, drawn today by Bengt Björkstén, executive director of the
Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, stems from his hypothesis that gut
flora is essential for immune regulation. The findings could have
implications for irritable bowel disease and type 1 diabetes.
The prevalence of allergy in Estonia and other Eastern European
countries has not followed the dramatic increases observed in the West.
In recent years this has been explained by the "hygiene hypothesis." The
hypothesis contends that an obsession with cleanliness has reduced
Westerners' exposure to infections that are fought off with Th1 cells;
instead, the immune system more often uses Th2 cells, which orchestrate
allergic reactions.
The hypothesis appears to be supported by the observation that
individuals with type 2 allergic responses are also less likely to
suffer classic Th1-mediated immune diseases, including type 1 diabetes.
But in countries where the prevalence of type 1 diabetes is highest,
the prevalence of allergic disease is also highest, says Björkstén. What
is true for the individual is not true for the population.
"Until recently the so-called hygiene hypothesis was that if you have
the Th2 skew you got allergy and the lack of microbial pressure would
explain why you don't have type 1," said Björkstén. "However, it would
not explain that if you took it the other way round then you would have
type 1 diabetes. In traditional societies both of the diseases are
uncommon."
Experiments carried out in Björkstén's lab using germ-free animals
have shed some light on the problem.
"Germ-free animals produce higher levels not only of IL-4, a Th2
cytokine, but also of interferon gamma [a Th1 cytokine] compared with
conventional animals," said Björkstén. In the total absence of microbial
pressure these animals appear to lack an immune "dampening mechanism,"
he says. Both type 2 and type 1 immune responses are overactive.
"The real interesting aspect is that IL-10 and TGF-beta (transforming
growth factor beta) will dampen this." IL-10 and TGF-beta are produced
by so-called regulatory T cells, which tone down immune responses.
"This is what we see in Estonia," he said. Estonian children who have
very high levels of IL-4, which would be associated with allergy in the
West, also have high levels of IL-10, which is not seen in the West.
This appears to prevent the IL-4 from triggering type 2 allergic
responses, he says.
Regulatory T cells are probably trained up early in the development
of the immune system during exposure to harmless gut microflora contends
Björkstén.
His hunch is backed up by studies he has carried out on babies in
Sweden and Estonia.
"The Estonian gut flora was similar to that described in Western
Germany and Sweden in the early 1960s," said Björkstén. Within days of
birth, healthy Estonian babies are colonized 3000 times more heavily
with Staphylococcus than are Swedish babies. At one month of age,
colonization with Lactobacillus is also significantly raised.
"I suggest that microbial pressure can actually drive the [immune]
system into a balanced response," concluded Björkstén. This could be a
balanced response to allergens, he says, but it could equally be a
balanced response to autoantigens, such as those that would otherwise
trigger diabetes, or even to normal gut bowel contents, which could
otherwise cause inflammatory bowel disease, another scourge of Western
countries. |