How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/324/7337/573

BMJ For Health Professionals
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents
Full text of this article
PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Send a response to this article
See related This week in BMJ item
Related editorials in BMJ
Other related articles in BMJ
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Eysenbach, G. || Köhler, C.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Patient - other
World Wide Web

BMJ 2002;324:573-577 ( 9 March )
 

Papers

How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews

Gunther Eysenbach, senior researcher,  Christian Köhler, researcher. 

Unit for Cybermedicine and eHealth, Department of Clinical Social Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str 58, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence to: G Eysenbach ey@yi.com

Objectives: To describe techniques for retrieval and appraisal used by consumers when they search for health information on the internet.
Design: Qualitative study using focus groups, naturalistic observation of consumers searching the world wide web in a usability laboratory, and in-depth interviews.
Participants: A total of 21 users of the internet participated in three focus group sessions. 17 participants were given a series of health questions and observed in a usability laboratory setting while retrieving health information from the web; this was followed by in-depth interviews.
Setting: Heidelberg, Germany.
Results: Although their search technique was often suboptimal, internet users successfully found health information to answer questions in an average of 5 minutes 42 seconds (median 4 minutes 18 seconds) per question. Participants in focus groups said that when assessing the credibility of a website they primarily looked for the source, a professional design, a scientific or official touch, language, and ease of use. However, in the observational study, no participants checked any "about us" sections of websites, disclaimers, or disclosure statements. In the post-search interviews, it emerged that very few participants had noticed and remembered which websites they had retrieved information from.
Conclusions: Further observational studies are needed to design and evaluate educational and technological innovations for guiding consumers to high quality health information on the web.

 

What is already known on this topic
Little is known about how consumers retrieve and assess the quality of health information on the internet

Qualitative data are needed to design educational and technological innovations to guide consumers to high quality health information

What this study adds
Users of the internet explore only the first few links on general search engines when seeking health information

Consumers say that when assessing the credibility of a site they primarily look for the source, a professional design, and a variety of other criteria

In practice, internet users do not check the "about us" sections of websites, try to find out who authors or owners of the site are, or read disclaimers or disclosure statements

Very few internet users later remember from which websites they retrieved information or who stood behind the sites



 


 

© BMJ 2002

This article has been cited by other articles:

 

  • Purcell, G. P, Wilson, P., Delamothe, T. (2002). The quality of health information on the internet. BMJ 324: 557-558 [Full text]  

Related editorials in BMJ:

The quality of health information on the internet .
Gretchen P Purcell, Petra Wilson, and Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2002 324: 557-558. [Full text]  

 

Other related articles in BMJ:

EDITOR'S CHOICE
The invention of talk.
BMJ 2002 324: 0. [Full text]  

 


 

 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ For Health Professionals
 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.