|
The study is the government's first effort to assess
the nationwide effects of all forms of radiation from the hundreds of
aboveground nuclear blasts detonated worldwide before such testing was
banned in 1963. The cancer estimates add a new human toll to the Cold War
and raise profound public policy questions, including whether the
government should do cancer screenings in high-fallout areas.
USA TODAY obtained portions of the study, which was supposed
to be finished more than a year ago.
"There should be no more waiting," says
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, who pushed the Department of Health and Human
Services to conduct the study in 1998. "People are still waiting for
real communication on their exposure risks and steps they can take."
The study's estimates of radiation dispersal are
based on complex computer analyses of weather patterns, population trends
and other data that can help gauge public exposure to fallout from
aboveground nuclear tests.
The cancer figures are a general nationwide estimate
there is no way to link specific cases to fallout. The study does not
assess cancer risks in other countries.
The data show that global fallout blanketed much of
the USA, with heavy pockets in Iowa, Tennessee, California, Oregon,
Washington and Idaho. Fallout from the Nevada tests settled more in the
mountain and Midwest states, including Utah, Idaho, Colorado, Kansas,
Nebraska, Iowa and Missouri.
The study measures exposure to an array of fallout
elements based on county of residence, birth date and factors such as
consumption of foods that absorb fallout.
It concludes that about 22,000 cancers, half of them
fatal, probably occurred from external exposure to radioactive fallout.
Those could include everything from melanoma to breast cancer.
The study attributes thousands of additional cancers
to internal radiation exposure, such as inhalation or eating tainted
food. Those cancers include at least 550 fatal leukemias and about 2,500
thyroid cancer deaths.
Nuclear weapons powers "owe the world a real
accounting of what they did to its health," says Arjun Makhijani of
the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. "The U.S. has
been the only honest country so far."
|