xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7336/505/c
BMJ 2002;324:505 ( 2 March )
News
Bush moves to tighten security around scientific research
Fred Charatan, Florida
In the wake of the anthrax attacks last October (BMJ 2001;323:942,
951), the Bush administration has been taking measures to improve
secrecy about science research, in the hope of keeping biological
weapons out of hostile hands.
The move has been criticised by some scientists who think that it will
threaten scientific advance and the spread of important information.
Explaining the new policy, Tom Ridge, director of homeland security, said:
"We're working hard for a set of guidelines so terrorists can't
use information that this country produces against us." He
added that scientists were being closely consulted about any new
guidelines.
Last month, the government began to withdraw from circulation nearly
7000 technical documents that dealt mainly with the production of
biological and chemical weapons. The documents, some of which were
published as far back as the 1940s and '50s, can no longer be
purchased from government outlets or ordered on the internet.
The Pentagon's Defence Technical Information Center has custody of many
reports, which are available to the public through the Scientific
and Technical Information Network. For $50 (£35;
57)
a year, the network provides citations to unclassified, unlimited documents.
The US Department of Commerce's National Technical Information Service sells
military documents and other kinds of federal documents. A
spokeswoman said that 6619 documents had been removed from
circulation and that the figure would rise as new candidate documents
were identified for security review.
The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, representing
19 societies and over 66000 scientists, was critical of
the Bush administration's move. "It comes down to a risk-benefit ratio,"
said the federation's president, Robert Rich. "I think the risk
of forgone advances is much greater than the information getting
into the wrong hands."
The American Society of Microbiology has over 40000 members and is the
world's largest organisation that performs microbe research. It has
been asked by the White House to limit potentially dangerous information
in the 11 journals it publishes, which include Infection and
Immunity, the Journal of Bacteriology, and the Journal of
Virology.
The society's president, Dr Abigail Salyers, in an article to be published
in March, wrote, "Terrorism feeds on fear, and fear feeds on
ignorance." The best defence against anthrax or any other
infectious disease, Dr Salyers added, was information that can
bolster public safety.
But the Sun Sentinel, south Florida's largest newspaper, wrote in a
January editorial, "It's just plain stupid to be making this
kind of information available."
|

|
|
(Credit: AP PHOTO/RON
EDWARDS)
|
|
President Bush waits to speak at Southern Maine
Technical College
|
|
© BMJ 2002
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.