US government supports Maine law to curb drug prices
Deborah Josefson Nebraska
The Bush administration has given evidence to the US Supreme Court in support
of Maines proposed prescription pricing controls law. If the law is upheld, 20
other states could follow suit.
In August 2000, Maine became the first US state to enact prescription drug
price controls, but fierce debate about whether the law was constitutional
stalled its implementation. The industry appealed to the Supreme Court, which
asked the Bush administration last October for its views.
Called Maine Rx, the law will force pharmaceutical companies to lower their
drug prices by using the purchasing power of the federally funded Medicaid
programme, which runs to over $200m (£137m; 212m) for drugs in the state.
The state will negotiate discounts with drug manufacturers to provide
discounts of up to 25% to an estimated 325 000 people on low and moderate
incomes who lack private health insurance and are not covered by Medicaid.
Patients enrolled in the programme will pay reduced drug prices to their
pharmacies, which are then reimbursed the discounted amount by the state, plus
an administrative fee of $3 (£2; 3.20) for each prescription filled. The drug
companies will then reimburse the state in the form of a rebate.
Companies refusing to comply face the prospect of their drugs being listed
for prior authorisation before payment, and a shift to alternative drugs and
generic equivalents. Under the terms of the law, the state can fine
pharmaceutical companies up to $100 0000 each time they overcharge for
prescription drugs or restrict their supply and distribution to Maine residents.
The Maine law authorises the state to keep drug prices low by fostering
competition, including the ability to negotiate with drug providers in other
countries, such as Canada, as well as with private and public entities. And it
allows the state to set maximum prices for prescription drugs by July 2003.
The Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America, a drug industry
lobby group, has contested the Maine law since its enactment on the grounds that
it violates interstate commerce laws by threatening to dictate drug prices in
other states. The group also contends that Maine Rx is inconsistent with the
Medicaid statute because it uses Medicaid monies to subsidise patients who are
ineligible for that federal benefit.
The US solicitor general, Theodore Olsen, contested both these claims in the
governments brief filed with the Supreme Court at the end of last month.
The Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America describes the
legislation as a dangerous development that will stifle innovation, discourage
new drug development, and restrict patients to the drugs that are on Maines
list, limiting access to potentially lifesaving and life enhancing medication.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"