Probiotics in prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhoea: meta-analysis

Vaccination News Home Page

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/324/7350/1361

BMJ Intended for Health Professionals - Click here for further information
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

Abridged text of this article
PDF [abridged] of this article
Full text of this article
PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Read responses to this article
See related This week in BMJ item
Related editorials in BMJ
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
D'Souza, A. L || Bulpitt, C. J
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 

BMJ 2002;324:1361 ( 8 June )
 

Papers

Probiotics in prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhoea: meta-analysis

Aloysius L D'Souza, research fellowChakravarthi Rajkumar, senior lecturer and honorary consultantJonathan Cooke, statisticianChristopher J Bulpitt, professor of geriatric medicine

Care of the Elderly Section, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN

Correspondence to: A L D'Souza aloysius.dsouza@ic.ac.uk

Objective: To evaluate efficacy of probiotics in prevention and treatment of diarrhoea associated with the use of antibiotics.
Design: Meta-analysis; outcome data (proportion of patients not getting diarrhoea) were analysed, pooled, and compared to determine odds ratios in treated and control groups.
Identification: Studies identified by searching Medline between 1966 and 2000 and the Cochrane Library.
Studies reviewed Nine randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trials of probiotics.
Results: Two of the nine studies investigated the effects of probiotics in children. Four trials used a yeast (Saccharomyces boulardii), four used lactobacilli, and one used a strain of enterococcus that produced lactic acid. Three trials used a combination of probiotic strains of bacteria. In all nine trials, the probiotics were given in combination with antibiotics and the control groups received placebo and antibiotics. The odds ratio in favour of active treatment over placebo in preventing diarrhoea associated with antibiotics was 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.62; P<0.001) for the yeast and 0.34 (0.19 to 0.61; P<0.01 for lactobacilli. The combined odds ratio was 0.37 (0.26 to 0.53; P<0.001) in favour of active treatment over placebo.
Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests that probiotics can be used to prevent antibiotic associated diarrhoea and that S boulardii and lactobacilli have the potential to be used in this situation. The efficacy of probiotics in treating antibiotic associated diarrhoea remains to be proved. A further large trial in which probiotics are used as preventive agents should look at the costs of and need for routine use of these agents.

 

What is already known on this topic
Probiotics are well known for their microbiological properties and have been used to treat gastrointestinal and vaginal mucosal infections

Conflicting results have prevented probiotics from being accepted as viable alternatives to conventional treatments for antibiotic associated diarrhoea

The commercial availability of probiotics is increasing

What this study adds
Probiotics may prevent antibiotic associated diarrhoea

The potential of specific probiotics to prevent Clostridium difficile infection secondary to the use of antibiotics should be re-examined

A large trial looking at the efficacy of probiotics in preventing antibiotic associated diarrhoea, particularly in elderly patients, with an emphasis on the optimal dose and cost benefits is needed



 


 


© BMJ 2002

This article has been cited by other articles:

 

  • Barbut, F., Meynard, J. L. (2002). Managing antibiotic associated diarrhoea. BMJ 324: 1345-1346 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Brewer's yeast and antibiotic associated diarrhoea
Andy Li
bmj.com, 7 Jun 2002 [Full text]

Related editorials in BMJ:

Managing antibiotic associated diarrhoea .
Frédéric Barbut and Jean Luc Meynard
BMJ 2002 324: 1345-1346. [Full text]  

 


 

 


Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ Intended for Health Professionals - click here!!
 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.