ASHINGTON,
June 28 The Bush administration announced a new anthrax vaccination policy
today, including plans to continue vaccinating some military personnel and to
stockpile for civilian use a large part of all the anthrax vaccine being
produced for the Pentagon.
Under the new policy, which reverses an earlier plan to vaccinate all
military personnel, the Pentagon intends in the next two weeks to begin
vaccinating those who are expected to spend at least 15 days a year in regions
where the threat of anthrax attack is considered high. That would include Iraq
and other Persian Gulf countries, the Korean peninsula and possibly Afghanistan,
officials said.
But at least a third of the vaccine to be produced will be stored by the
Department of Health and Human Services in secret warehouses scattered around
the country for use after a domestic anthrax attack, administration officials
said. In the event of such an attack, most of those doses would probably be
given to police officers, firefighters, rescue squads and others required to
respond, as well as to people who lived or worked in areas exposed to the
anthrax bacteria, administration officials said.
The new policy reflects in part a mounting concern within the Bush
administration and among intelligence officials about reports that Iraq has well
over 2,650 gallons of liquid anthrax, and could be making more in more than half
a dozen laboratories.
The Iraqi anthrax could be used in biological weapon attacks in the region,
posing a threat to military personnel, intelligence officials said. But some
administration officials said they could not rule out such attacks in the United
States.
The officials said that this conclusion was based on recent assessments by
United States intelligence officials, who are constantly monitoring Iraq's
ability to produce chemical, biological and nuclear materials, and by United
Nations weapons inspectors, who have also been re-examining their estimates of
Iraqi stockpiles of unconventional weapons based on information dating from as
early as 1991, foreign and American officials said.
The Pentagon's review of its vaccination policy has dragged on for months,
and concern about whether the administration was perceived to be moving fast
enough to protect soldiers was a factor in the announcement of a new policy
today. The Pentagon said it would immediately begin vaccinating some soldiers at
greatest risk and would significantly expand stockpiles of the vaccine for
civilian use.
The new vaccination policy reflects a reversal of one instituted in 1997 by
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen. That plan required that all 2.4 million
active and reserve military personnel be inoculated by 2003. The Pentagon
declined to say how many people it expects to vaccinate in the coming year.
"This is a shift from our earlier policy, which was to vaccinate everyone,"
Dr. William Winkenwerder Jr., the assistant secretary of defense for health
affairs, told reporters today. "This is a policy that's focused on those in
higher-threat areas."
The Pentagon acknowledged in interviews this week that only 69,000 soldiers
had received the full six-shot anthrax vaccine series.
During the Persian Gulf war, intelligence officials argued that Saddam
Hussein would not use his stockpile of anthrax and other chemicals unless he and
his regime were clearly threatened. The administration's recent statements about
the need for "regime change" in Iraq, its inclusion of Baghdad in the "axis of
evil," and President Bush's articulation of a pre-emption doctrine that would
justify American military action against any hostile nation that makes
unconventional weapons, however, have increased the threat that Mr. Hussein
might use his large arsenal, some officials say.
United States military planners and United Nations weapons inspectors have
been re-examining their estimates about the amount of anthrax that Iraq may have
stockpiled, and the amount that Mr. Hussein has been able to make since he
expelled inspectors three years ago.
A recent analysis by the United Nations inspectors says there is compelling
evidence that Iraq has large stocks of liquid anthrax that could be used at any
time.
The new policy clearly reflects the thinking that civilians in this country
are as susceptible to anthrax attacks as soldiers in combat zones, as was
demonstrated by the death of five people last year from anthrax spores sent
through the mail.
But it also underscores the problem the government has had in producing
enough vaccine for the entire military. In December 1999, the Food and Drug
Administration ordered the lone manufacturer of anthrax vaccine in the United
States, the BioPort Corporation of Lansing, Mich., to halt production after
inspectors found dozens of violations in safety, consistency, record-keeping and
sterility at its Michigan plant. The agency authorized BioPort to resume
production again in January.
"I think the shift was driven by a couple of factors," Dr. Winkenwerder said.
"The first is that we are dealing in a constrained supply situation."
Some administration officials have also raised questions about whether
BioPort could produce enough vaccine in the coming year to support a major
military operation, such as an invasion of Iraq. Some senior military planners
have argued that ousting Saddam Hussein would require 200,000 troops.
BioPort officials asserted today that they could produce enough doses to
vaccinate the entire military, and they expressed dismay at Pentagon suggestions
that the new policy was being driven by supply constraints.
"We can make millions on an annual basis," said Robert Kramer, the company
president. "We were disappointed to hear at the press conference that the
vaccination schedule is supply driven, that policy was being driven by supply.
We're ready, willing and able to partner with anyone to produce enough doses
under our license."
Mr. Kramer said, and administration officials confirmed, that despite the
Pentagon announcement today there was not yet a specific agreement on how much
vaccine Bioport would sell the government and at what price. Under a contract
reached three years ago, the Pentagon pays $10.64 a dose, and both Pentagon and
company officials said the price could rise significantly, perhaps doubling.
Pentagon officials have declined to say how much vaccine BioPort is capable
of producing, but administration officials said the government wanted to buy
about three million doses in the next three years. Administration officials said
the military would receive about a third of the vaccine, the civilian stockpile
about a third and the last third would go to other government agencies, like the
State Department, that have employees who could be in danger.
Other officials say the new policy reflects a desire to provide sufficient
vaccine for civilians. "At this point in time we do not have a large enough
stockpile to pre-vaccinate, so the stockpile will be reserved for post
exposure," said Jerome M. Hauer, acting assistant secretary for emergency
preparedness at the Department of Health and Human Services. "The stockpile for
civilians will be used for post-exposure vaccination and as the stockpile grows
we will re-evaluate our policy as to whether certain first responders should be
pre-vaccinated."
Full inoculation against anthrax requires a regimen of six shots administered
over 18 months, followed by annual booster shots. Pentagon officials say a
person must receive at least three shots to gain at least partial protection.
The Pentagon estimates that about 525,000 soldiers have received at least one
anthrax vaccination over the last four years, but the vast majority have not
received all six shots.
In addition to questions about BioPort's production, the Pentagon's mandatory
anthrax vaccination program has been slowed by opposition from a small but vocal
group of soldiers who contend the vaccine has potentially dangerous side
effects.
Since the program began in 1998, more than 450 people in the military have
been disciplined for refusing to be vaccinated. Those opponents won support from
some Republicans on Capitol Hill, where the House Government Reform Committee
held hearings airing their complaints.
Today, Representative Christopher Shays, a Connecticut Republican who
championed the critics of the mandatory vaccination program, applauded the new
policy, calling it a vindication of people who were forced out of the military
for refusing to participate.
"The scaled-back approach announced today reflects a clear-eyed view of the
threat and a responsible application of the limited medical countermeasures
available," Mr. Shays said in a statement.
The analysis of Iraq's liquid anthrax stockpile, a summary of which has
circulated in recent weeks among senior United Nations officials and selected
Western governments, including the United States, says there must now be a
"presumption" that Baghdad concealed at least 10,000 liters, or 2,650 gallons,
of anthrax after the 1991 Persian Gulf war, officials said.
The seven-page report, an analysis of evidence that was gathered for a 1991
C.I.A. report on Iraqi biological weapons, the officials said, builds a
circumstantial case that the anthrax remains potent and available.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"