|
A Midland MP yesterday urged the Government not to
dismiss new evidence linking autism and bowel disorders to the controversial
MMR jab.
Irish scientists found a strain of the measles virus
used in the vaccine, in tissue samples taken from the inflamed intestines of
12 children.
Every member of the group has developed autism since
being given the injection.
Pathologist Professor John O'Leary, and his researchers
at Trinity College, in Dublin, believe their findings raise urgent questions
over the vaccine's role in the children's condition.
Julie Kirkbride (Con Bromsgrove), who is campaigning
for single jabs to be made available on the NHS, said she feared the
Government would not take the findings seriously.
Ms Kirkbride's Private Members' Bill to ensure parents
are given the legal right to opt for single vaccinations on the NHS is due
to receive its second reading in the Commons on Friday.
However, she said, she feared the Government's stance
and its reluctance to consider new evidence on the issue would hinder her
chances of success.
Ms Kirkbride said: "The latest research is a very
worrying development because so far the work done by John O'Leary and Andrew
Wakefield (who first suggested a link between MMR and autism) has been
dismissed by the medical establishment.
"But this is yet more evidence to show that the measles
found in the jab is another piece of the jigsaw linking MMR with autism.
"I fear that the Government's reaction will be the same
as before, to use every lever at its disposal to get the medical
establishment to denounce these findings.
"I very much hope they will finally accept there's an
urgent need for more research, which should focus on children who are
already damaged in this way.
"Every time I call for the single vaccinations to be
made available on the NHS, I am accused by the Labour backbench loyalists of
trying to impede confidence in MMR and paving the way for children to die of
measles.
"That is an outrageous slur and clearly untrue."
The announcement of Prof O'Leary's findings, which are
due to be presented to the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland
next month, comes days after the Government seized on more research which
bolsters its claims that the MMR vaccine is safe.
In an earlier study, Prof O'Leary found an unknown
measles virus in gut biopsies from 71 of 90 autistic children with bowel
problems.
His team claims the latest results corroborates its
earlier research linking measles with autism.
Ms Kirkbride, whose 17-month-old son Angus was given
single vaccinations at the Desumo private clinic in Worcester, said she was
not confident the Government would take these findings seriously.
A number of parents who want an alternative to the MMR
jab are planning legal action against the Government and Ms Kirkbride said:
"I suspect the Government will not take notice of this issue until the
Department of Health is taken to court by 2,000 angry parents next year.
"I don't understand the Government's position in the
face of mounting scientific research that gives every parent cause for
concern.
"I'll be lucky if my Bill even gets its second reading
on Friday because I know Labour don't support it.
"But I shall continue campaigning for single
vaccinations regardless of whether it's heard or not."
The combined MMR vaccine, which contains live measles,
mumps and rubella virus, was launched in 1988 and is given to infants aged
12-15 months up to four years.
Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson has expressed
fears that single vaccinations may result in parents failing to complete the
full course, which could lead to a resurgence of measles, mumps and rubella.
Dr Andrew Wakefield, a consultant gastroenterologist,
first uncovered the possible link between MMR and autism in
1998. He resigned from his job at the Royal Free
Hospital in London earlier this year amid claims he had been forced out over
the MMR controversy.
He said: "Prof O'Leary and colleagues have now provided
what may prove to be the most important piece of evidence to date in the
case against the MMR vaccine.
"Parents must be given at the very least a choice of
single vaccines.
"Not to do so in the face of this data and all the
other evidence we have now published would be negligent in the extreme." |