Vaccination News Home Page

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7352/1496

PDF of this article Email this article to a friend Respond to this article Download to Citation Manager Search Medline for articles by: Goodman, R. || Meltzer, H. Alert me when: New articles cite this article

Collections under which this article appears: Child and adolescent psychiatry

BMJ 2002;324:1496-1497 ( 22 June )

Papers

Mental health problems of children in the community: 18 month follow up

Robert Goodman, professor ^a, Tamsin Ford, clinical research fellow ^a, Howard Meltzer, principal social researcher ^b. 

^a Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, ^b Office for National Statistics, London SW1V 2QQ

Correspondence to: Robert Goodman r.goodman@iop.kcl.ac.uk

In a recent national survey, the prevalence of psychiatric disorder in children and adolescents in Great Britain was more than 9%.¹ Parents and doctors commonly think that these disorders are transient, but longitudinal studies show otherwise.² We followed up children from the national survey to examine persistence in a large sample of children in Britain.¹

	Participants, method, and results

Top Participants, method, and... Comment References

The original survey studied a sample of 10 438 British children aged 5-15 years.¹ We sent the parents of all children with a psychiatric disorder (936) and a third of those without a psychiatric disorder (3029) a questionnaire. It included the strengths and difficulties questionnaire, a well validated measure of childhood psychopathology and its impact on the child. ^{3 4}

A total of 73% of parents responded; most losses were non-contacts, not refusals. The response rate was lower among those with a child with a disorder than those without (66% v 76%). Non-responders at follow up had had significantly more symptoms initially (analysis of variance adjusting for initial diagnosis, F=39.9, 1 df, P<0.001: the mean symptom score for non-responders was greater, by 1.2, than for responders, matched by diagnosis). Responders' and non-responders' initial impact scores did not differ significantly. Overall, differential non-response will not have led us to overestimate the persistence of psychopathology.

The figure shows symptom and impact scores in children initially diagnosed with hyperkinetic, conduct, emotional, or no disorder. We used paired t tests to test whether the changes in symptom and impact scores in children with hyperkinetic, conduct, emotional, or no disorder were significant. For conduct disorder, neither symptoms nor impact changed significantly. Symptoms (P<0.05) but not impact fell significantly in children with hyperkinesis. For emotional disorder, there were significant falls in both symptoms and impact (P<0.001 for both), though the follow up scores were still substantially greater than in the group with no initial disorder (P<0.001, independent samples t test).

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Mean symptom and impact scores initially and at 18 month follow up from the strengths and difficulties questionnaire, completed by parents, for children with and without initial psychiatric disorder

We defined "caseness" from the combination of raised symptom (14) and impact scores (2).³ Caseness at follow up was considered informative for only the 86% (2487/2901) of participants in whom caseness was congruent with the initial psychiatric diagnosis. For example, when a child was initially diagnosed as having conduct disorder solely on the basis of symptoms reported by a teacher, and when the initial questionnaire, completed by the parents, described their child as normal, then the diagnosis (disorder present) and the caseness (negative) were not congruent. So, caseness was not considered informative at follow up, since the parent's answers to the questionnaire would probably not change whether or not the conduct disorder persisted or was resolved. Similarly, if the initial diagnosis of depression in a teenager was based on self reported symptoms (not reported by a parent), the follow up parent questionnaire is unlikely to be informative.

Caseness criteria at the 18 month follow up were met by 3% (67/2249) of children who did not initially have a psychiatric disorder, compared with 62% (147/238) of children who did (relative risk 20.7; 95% confidence interval 16.0 to 26.7). Persistence at 18 months varied with initial diagnosis: 36% (25/70) for children who had an emotional disorder initially, compared with 73% (122/168) for children with other disorders initially (mostly conduct and hyperkinetic disorders, sometimes with coexistent emotional disorders) (P<0.001, ² test).

	Comment

Top Participants, method, and... Comment References

Childhood psychopathology is often persistent, particularly among children with conduct disorder and hyperkinesis. Although emotional disorders have a better prognosis than conduct or hyperkinetic disorders, they are not always benign: their resolution over 18 months is far from complete, and recent work suggests an increased risk of similar disorders recurring in adulthood.²

Everyone in contact with children should take the symptoms of emotional distress, behavioural difficulty, and hyperactivity seriously, as they may impair the child's function and development and are unlikely to be transient. This is particularly important as evidence based interventions can alleviate distress and minimise the secondary handicap that results from disrupted education and impaired social development.⁵

	Acknowledgments

   Contributors: HM directed the initial survey and the follow up and discussed the analyses, findings, and draft versions of the paper. RG and TF were on the steering committee for both surveys. RG performed the analyses while TF took the lead in drafting the paper. RG is guarantor.

	Footnotes

Funding. TF is funded by a Wellcome clinical training fellowship and the original surveys were funded by the Department of Health.

Competing interests: None declared.

	References

Top Participants, method, and... Comment References

(Accepted 27 February 2002)
 

© BMJ 2002
 

PDF of this article Email this article to a friend Respond to this article Download to Citation Manager Search Medline for articles by: Goodman, R. || Meltzer, H. Alert me when: New articles cite this article

Collections under which this article appears: Child and adolescent psychiatry

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.