he
New England Journal of Medicine is relaxing its strict conflict-of-interest
rules for authors of certain articles because it cannot find enough experts
without financial ties to drug companies.
The change applies to experts who write either editorials or review articles,
which are not original studies but overviews of research on a particular drug or
treatment. It brings the journal's policy into line with those of other medical
publications.
From 1990 until now, the journal's rule was that nobody who wrote a review
article or editorial could have any financial interest in a company that made a
product discussed by the article, or in any of its competitors.
Now the journal will forbid such articles by authors who receive payments of
$10,000 or more a year as a result of such a stake, or who have stock options or
patent interests in those companies.
Original studies will continue to indicate the sponsor of the research and
disclose any financial stake the author might have.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
Free Shipping Everyday - Visit babyearth.com today for innovative products and free shipping with minimum purchase.