Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0%2C1286%2C43891%2C00.html

0  

LOOK FOR 

 Get Wired News Your Way
  Newsletters, handheld versions, alerts ...
 



Med-Tech Center
Today's Headlines
3:59 p.m. June 24, 2002 PDT

Genealogy Makes Strides With DNA

Static: The New Hearing Aid

Adult Stem Cell Study Promising

Legends of a Lost Tribe's Origin

The 'Lost Tribe' of Appalachia

A Dust-Up Over GMO Crops

The Next ACT in Clone Controversy

The Code of Life as a Paint Set

DNA Seeks Stamp of Approval

A Challenge to Science and Nature

Cloning Bill Bans Abortion Too?

Embrace the Jacuzzi for the Cure

More ...
 Medical Editor Rips Into FDA
Reuters



Print this


11:54 a.m. May 17, 2001 PDT
LONDON -- The editor of a top medical journal on Friday accused the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the world's most powerful drug watchdog, of endangering people's lives.

Richard Horton of The Lancet said the FDA, which safeguards the health of 274 million people and regulates over $1 trillion worth of products, was compromised by funding from the drugs industry and pressure from Congress.

 

See also:
•  S. Africa to Rule on AIDS Drugs
•  Bush Budget Would Hurt Research
•  Biotech in the Market for a Cure
•  New Quest: Mapping Gene Patents
•  Check yourself into Med-Tech
•  Everybody's got issues in Politics

In an editorial, he slammed the FDA for its handling of GlaxoSmithKline Plc's controversial bowel drug Lotronex.

 

The FDA approved Lotronex in February 2000, but the company voluntarily withdrew it from the market nine months later after the deaths of five patients who had been taking it.

Senior FDA officials are now trying to reintroduce it, Horton said.

"This story reveals not only dangerous failings in a single drug's approval and review process but also the extent to which the FDA, its Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) in particular, has become a servant of the industry," he wrote in an editorial in the journal.

According to Horton, serious side effects were evident during the pre-approval process and shortly afterwards but the FDA kept the product on the market. "The decision was to prove fatal," said Horton.

The Lancet said scientists within the FDA who raised concerns about the drug's safety were sidelined and excluded from future discussions. An independent review of research found serious flaws but calls for more studies were ignored.

"That is where there has been a terrible failure in evaluating the safety of this drug," Horton told Reuters.

"The FDA is not only compromised because it receives so much funding from industry, but because it comes under incredible congressional pressure to be favorable to industry. That has led to deaths," he added.

A spokesman at the FDA said he could not comment on the editorial but added that the agency was formulating a response to the allegations.

The agency monitors the safety, labeling, import, transport, storage and sale of food ingredients, drugs, cosmetics and surgical supplies.

GlaxoSmithKline confirmed the company was in discussions with the FDA but refused to discuss the timing of any decision.

"We are in discussions with the FDA over Lotronex," spokesman Martin Sutton said. "Both the FDA and ourselves are trying to find a resolution that will benefit and protect patients."

Lotronex was developed to treat irritable bowel syndrome which can cause disabling bouts of constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain and bloating.

But soon after its launch reports of side effects such as severe constipation and ischaemic colitis, a restriction of blood flow to the colon, began to surface.

"It is an impossible conflict for safety issues to be overseen by a center that receives funding from industry to review and approve new drugs," Horton added.

Copyright © 2002 Reuters Limited.

 


Have a comment on this article? Send it.
Printing? Use this version.


Related Wired Links:

Sleeping Sickness Drug Revived
May 4, 2001

S. Africa to Rule on AIDS Drugs
April 14, 2001

Bush Budget Would Hurt Research
March 29, 2001

Biotech in the Market for a Cure
March 16, 2001

 





     » Lycos Worldwide  © Copyright 2002, Lycos, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  Lycos® is a registered trademark of Carnegie Mellon University.
     About Terra Lycos | Help | Feedback | Jobs | Advertise | Business Development


     Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Lycos Network Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.