Limited Smallpox Vaccine Use Eyed
Expert Panel Rejects Mass Inoculations
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Find Post
Stories by Topic: |
|
--or-- |
|
Search Story
Archive by Keyword: |
|
Advanced Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 21, 2002; Page A01
ATLANTA, June 20 -- A panel of scientific experts that advises the
federal government recommended yesterday that a small number of health care
workers in each state -- perhaps 20,000 Americans in all -- be vaccinated
against smallpox to protect them in the event of an outbreak.
The advice, if accepted by the Bush administration, would expand the use
of the vaccine for the first time in nearly 30 years. But it represents the
most limited of several options the panel considered for incorporating
smallpox vaccination into the country's defense against biological
terrorism.
The choice reflects the panel's belief that the risk of an attack
employing smallpox virus is too small to justify the many complications that
would arise from widespread vaccination.
Currently, only scientists who handle the virus are vaccinated. The last
human case of smallpox occurred in 1978, and the microbe is known to exist
only in a few laboratory freezers. Some experts believe samples of the virus
may have gotten into the hands of bioterrorists or hostile governments.
The decision also affirms a belief that the strategy used to eradicate
smallpox in the 1970s would work in the event of a bioterror attack. That
strategy, called surveillance-and-containment, requires that people exposed
to smallpox virus, and their immediate contacts, be vaccinated, observed and
quarantined if they become ill. This approach, also known as "ring
vaccination," doesn't rely on full-scale vaccination of a population, either
before or after an outbreak.
"We had to base our decisions on what we were told, which is that the
risk [of attack] is low," said Natalie J. Smith, a California state public
health official and a member of the 15-member Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices. "We will reconsider our decision if we get
information that the risk is changing."
The ACIP is made up of academic physicians and public health officials
appointed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its advice
carries great weight and is usually followed.
In a statement, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson
said he will "now review the recommendation with experts . . . as the
administration works toward a policy on the smallpox vaccine."
Under the recommendation, each state would designate at least one
"smallpox response team" composed of physicians, epidemiologists,
investigators, lab technicians, nurses and vaccinators. A few law
enforcement officers (possibly from the FBI or state police agencies) might
also be included in this group. In general, though, paramedics, police
officers, firefighters and other "first responders" would not be vaccinated.
Each state would also pick one or more hospital to be a referral center for
possible cases of smallpox. At each site, a pre-designated group of
caregivers -- including possibly clerks and technicians -- would be
vaccinated and expected to care for initial cases.
In all cases, vaccination would be voluntary. Although many states are
already putting together such teams, it's unlikely vaccination would begin
before October. That's because many legal and procedural decisions must be
made, including who will pay damages to people harmed by the vaccine.
A recent poll found that 60 percent of adults would take smallpox vaccine
if offered it. Although the committee considered public demand -- and the
argument that citizens, not the government, should make the final risk-vs.-benefit
calculation -- this view was ultimately rejected.
"This is a public health decision. There are many issues in the past
where the public health interest does not jibe with the personal health
interest," said John F. Modlin, a professor at Dartmouth Medical School and
chairman of ACIP.
Smallpox vaccine is a live virus, vaccinia, which infects a person and
sets up an immune response that protects against smallpox, a closely related
microbe. It causes more serious and more frequent complications than
vaccines used against other diseases.
Even with careful screening of people at high risk of vaccine
complications -- AIDS patients, recipients of organ transplants and others
with weakened immunity -- smallpox vaccination would probably cause at least
one death per million people vaccinated. A larger number of people would
become seriously but not fatally ill, although some would have permanent
disabilities.
A newly vaccinated person can transmit vaccinia to other people for a
brief period. The likelihood of such spread -- and the fact the vaccine is
technically "experimental" and must be given only after extensive counseling
-- weighed heavily in the committee's decision.
"You can transmit it to people who haven't consented," Smith said.
Proponents of wider use of the vaccine say these risks are overpowered by
the chance that a smallpox outbreak could get out of control if it began in
multiple places or with a large number of initial victims.
"I think ring containment in a terrorist situation has been thoroughly
discredited . . . and that has not been recognized by CDC," said William J.
Bicknell, a physician at the Boston University School of Public Health who
was the Massachusetts health commissioner in the 1970s.
He cited a mathematical model constructed by a Yale University researcher
that predicted an attack that began with 1,000 infections would lead to
nearly 100,000 deaths in three months if addressed through ring containment,
but fewer than 1,000 deaths if there was mass vaccination immediately after
the first cases were identified. That model was one of several -- and by far
the darkest -- presented to the committee at several meetings in recent
weeks. People who believe it say it argues strongly for a policy of
vaccination now, before any cases occur.
© 2002 The Washington Post Company
|