Vaccination News Home Page

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7350/1353

BMJ Intended for US health professionals - Click here for further information
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Read responses to this article
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Tanne, J. H.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Neonates

BMJ 2002;324:1353 ( 8 June )

News

High level of resources for neonatal intensive care does not give US better outcomes

Janice Hopkins Tanne, New York

The United States has more neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds per person than the United Kingdom, Canada, or Australia but higher rates of low birth weight and death among neonates, says a study from Dartmouth Medical School's Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences in Pediatrics (2002;109:1036-43)[Abstract/Full Text].

The study compared neonatal intensive care resources, preconception care and prenatal care, rates of low birth weight and neonatal deaths (deaths within the first month), and infant mortality (deaths within the first year).

The United States has 6.1 neonatologists per 10000 live births, compared with 3.7 in Australia, 3.3 in Canada, and 2.7 in the United Kingdom. The United States has 3.3 neonatal intensive care beds per 10000 live births, while Australia and Canada have 2.6 and the United Kingdom has 0.67. Of all neonates in the United States, 1.45% had a very low birth weight (<1500 g), compared with about 1% in the other countries, and infants weighing <2500 g were also more common in the United States.

The crude neonatal mortality rate was 4.7 deaths per 1000 births in the United States, compared with 3.0 in Australia, 3.7 in Canada, and 3.8 in England and Wales.

For infants weighing <1000 g the death rates were 396.7 per 1000 live births in the United States, 330.4 in Australia, 444.9 in Canada, and 391.4 in England and Wales. For infants weighing between 1000 g and 2499 g the rates were 13.2 per 1000 births in the United States, 12.8 in Australia, 16.9 in Canada, and 12.4 in England and Wales. For infants weighing >2500 g, infant mortality rates were higher in the United States. If the United States achieved Canada's survival rate, almost 3000 more babies would survive each year.

Lead author Dr Lindsay Thompson pointed out that Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom provide health insurance for all children under 18 and all women aged 18-44. In the United States, however, only 86% of children and 78% of women had health insurance. Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom provide free family planning advice and prenatal and perinatal care.

"Low birth weight is the number one predictor of neonatal mortality," Dr Thompson said, because of factors during pregnancy, delivery, and birth. The United States has high rates of teenage pregnancy and unintended pregnancy, and teenagers are often poor and uninsured.

She recommended maintaining the current level of neonatal care in the United States but giving more attention to preconception care and prenatal care.


 

 
(Credit: AP PHOTO/CHARLES REX ARBOGAST)


 

Nurse Jeana Jackson handles a premature baby at a hospital in Illinois---would her salary be better spent on antenatal care?
 



 


© BMJ 2002
 

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Read responses to this article
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Tanne, J. H.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Neonates

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Prenatal care and low birthweight
Donald W. MacCorquodale, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Jun 2002 [Full text]


 

 


Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ Intended for Health Professionals - click here!!
 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.