cknowledging
the budget constraints of many state programs intended to help people with
little or no health insurance afford AIDS drugs,
GlaxoSmithKline said yesterday that it was freezing the American prices of
its six AIDS drugs through January 2004. The freeze includes its most widely
prescribed AIDS medicine, Combivir.
An individual might pay about $18 a day for Combivir an annual cost of
$6,600. Companies typically raise the prices of these drugs roughly 5 percent a
year.
GlaxoSmithKline will also continue to provide some drugs free to low-income
people eligible for its patient assistance program.
The company's decision follows a similar move by
Pfizer recently to freeze the price of its two AIDS drugs, Viracept and
Rescriptor, for two years.
The state programs "are starting to have a real budget crunch," the company's
chief executive, Jean-Pierre Garnier, said. Glaxo, which is based in Britain,
decided that the freeze should apply to all its AIDS drugs sold in the United
States. "It's a small step, but it helps," said Dr. Garnier, adding that he
hoped other manufacturers would follow suit.
The world's second-largest drug company, GlaxoSmithKline led many of its
competitors in providing discounts on prescription drugs to low-income elderly
people. Earlier this year, seven companies, including Glaxo- SmithKline, agreed
to adopt a program offering discounts of 20 percent or more on dozens of
medications.
With the bulk of their funds from the federal government, state and local
AIDS drug assistance programs were created in 1987 and were incorporated in the
Ryan White AIDS legislation in 1990. Last year, these programs provided drugs,
some of which can cost as much as $12,000 a year, to 140,000 people.
In June 2001 alone, according to a recent report, these programs filled a
total of 246,062 prescriptions for 76,743 individuals at a cost of $63.8
million.
As more people use these programs and the price of the drugs increased, many
programs are struggling to meet demand, according to the National Alliance of
State and Territorial AIDS Directors in Washington. Ten states have established
waiting lists or are otherwise limiting access.
"We are really concerned about the crisis looming ahead," said Murray Penner,
a program manager at the alliance. Federal financing "has not kept up with
demand," he said.
While the Bush administration has proposed keeping funds in 2003 at $619
million, a coalition of AIDS groups has estimated that the programs need an
additional $162 million, Mr. Penner said, and many states are also having
difficulty finding the money in their budgets to pay for the programs.
Hundreds of people are now on waiting lists, according to Glaxo- SmithKline,
including 550 in North Carolina and 220 in Alabama. The company says a
sustainable system is necessary to finance these programs.
Glaxo's decision "is a step in the direction drug companies need to be
going," Mr. Penner said.
The high cost of AIDS drugs has set off criticism, particularly in the poor
countries least able to afford them. In the United States, drug companies are
also under considerable political pressure to keep prices level.
"The pharmaceutical companies won't be using pricing as a lever to gain
top-line growth," said Andrea Hotz, a research associate who follows European
drug makers for Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, and Glaxo's move yesterday is
one way to generate some good will.
"There is great difficulty finding funding for all drugs everywhere in the
world," Dr. Garnier said.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"