Give Americans the Choice to Take the Smallpox Vaccine
by Charles V. Peña
Charles V. Peña is
senior defense policy analyst at the Cato Institute.
The Centers for Disease Control will hold closed meetings in the
coming weeks on what to do about possible bioterrorism and the smallpox vaccine.
Americans are smart enough to choose whether to take the vaccine and therefore
it should be made available to the public.
Unfortunately, the current policy leaves Americans with no choice in the
matter--no freedom to choose what may be most effective for their own security
and peace of mind. In the case of a bioterrorist attack using smallpox,
Americans cannot immunize themselves beforehand with the vaccine. The government
won't give its own citizens access to the vaccine, even though it's in stock and
even though Vice President Cheney's recent comments on terrorism show that the
threat of smallpox bioterrorism is real.
That's unacceptable.
At its June 19-20 meeting, the CDC will likely produce policy guidance for
smallpox vaccination. The CDC should decide against perpetuating the current
"ring containment" strategy, whereby government doles out smallpox vaccinations
only after a known outbreak in the hope of containing the spread of the virus.
That may make sense for a natural outbreak in a rural area, but such a policy
would likely be disastrous against smallpox bioterrorism.
Although eradicated as a disease in 1978-the government had mandated
vaccination of all children with the vaccine-smallpox is a devastating virus. It
has a 30 percent or higher fatality rate among unvaccinated persons (Americans
born after 1972 have not been vaccinated) and is easily transmitted. Smallpox
has killed more people than any other infectious disease in human history and in
the 20th century killed three times more people than all the wars combined (400
million vs. 111 million).
Compared to the anthrax-laden letters distributed in the mail, the smallpox
virus is easier to disperse. It can be aerosolized and released into the air in
a crowded place such as a shopping mall, sports stadium, or airport. The virus
need not even be weaponized. Suicide terrorists could infect themselves with the
virus and transmit it to others by coughing and sneezing, which can release
millions of deadly virus particles though the air.
Indeed, a smallpox attack could occur at multiple locations and may not be
immediately known (the initial symptoms are flu-like and it could be 12 or more
days before smallpox is diagnosed). As a result, the virus could spread widely
and kill thousands before the first vaccinations are administered (the vaccine
must be given within 4 days of being exposed to be effective). Moreover, given a
dense and highly mobile population, the virus is likely to spread much faster
and wider (including to other countries) than a ring containment strategy can
keep up with. And in the inevitable post-attack panic and confusion, the medical
infrastructure would be overwhelmed by millions of people demanding immediate
vaccination.
Rather than leaving the entire population at risk and responding to a
smallpox attack after the fact, a better approach would be to take preventative
measures now. The U.S. government is currently in possession of 15 million doses
of smallpox vaccine that, according to a study published by the New England
Journal of Medicine, can be effectively diluted 5-fold (perhaps as much as 10
times). Combined with some 85 million additional doses of newly discovered
smallpox vaccine, there is a sufficient supply of vaccine to allow for voluntary
vaccination (with vaccine previously ordered, the smallpox vaccine supply should
be about 450 million doses by the end of this year).
Because there are known risks with the smallpox vaccination (in particular
for pregnant women and those with weakened immune systems), individuals should
be allowed to make a voluntary, informed decision (in consultation with a
doctor) to understand, manage, and mitigate those risks. But the government's
withholding of the vaccine until after an attack -- forcing people to make the
stark choice of having to accept the risks of vaccination or be exposed to the
deadly smallpox virus -- is not an acceptable policy in a society that values
individual life and liberty.
Even if only a fraction of the population were vaccinated beforehand, a
"community immunity" effect would occur that lowers the rate of transmission of
the disease and significantly increases the chances of success of a ring
containment strategy. As a result, the chances of a successful attack would be
lowered, which could also have a deterrent effect and thus might prevent such an
attack from occurring. But that won't happen if Americans aren't given the
freedom to choose the vaccine.
Vice President Cheney recently warned, "The prospects of a future attack
against the United States are almost certain." Even a partially vaccinated
population against smallpox is more effective than leaving Americans unprotected
and at risk, hoping that a pound of cure will work after the fact.
This article was first published in FOX News Online, June 5,
2002.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"