WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal health officials will begin requiring makers of
certain high-risk medical devices to closely track how well they work in
patients.
The new rules mark an effort to better identify dangerous side effects that
are too rare to fully evaluate in studies before a device is sold. Tracking may
help solve other quandaries, such as whether recalling and repairing a medical
device took care of a threat.
The Food and Drug Administration largely depends on an underused program in
which doctors voluntarily report problems in devices that may need to be
recalled or even pulled off the market.
A 1990 federal law did require the FDA to order close tracking -- called
surveillance -- of certain implanted devices, after the belated discovery that
an artificial heart valve popular in the 1980s had a deadly defect.
By the late 1990s, the FDA was calling that law self-defeating: It brought in
reams of data about old devices like pacemakers, whose risks were well known.
But it didn't give the FDA time or money to focus on products officials thought
posed more of a risk, such as newer devices whose side effects aren't yet fully
understood, said FDA biologist Laura Alonge.
Congress in 1997 authorized a change, allowing the FDA to choose which
devices need such close tracking.
After five years of review, the FDA announced rules Wednesday that would lead
to surveillance of, at most, 30 devices a year. Tracking could be used for the
most high-risk, complex devices; life-supporting or sustaining devices used
outside a health facility; long-term implants; or devices where failure will
probably cause serious consequences.
Examples being tracked include a break-prone patch for life-threatening
abdominal aortic aneurysms, and home kits that perform crucial tests of Coumadin
users' blood-clotting ability.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"