|
|
FDA Ignores Complaints of Neurological
Symptoms
In 1989, the FDA received over 4,000 complaints from
people who described adverse reactions. Because the FDA conveniently lists
aspartane as a "food additive", it removes the legal requirement for adverse
effect reporting to any Federal agency and the necessity for safety
monitoring processes. Research also indicates that aspartame, when combined
with glutamine products (such as MSG, widely used in foods) increase the
likelihood of brain damage occurring in children.[12]
Aspartame Affecting Airline Pilots
Some of the more interesting developments in 1989
surfaced in the Palm Beach Post on October 14th, where an article by Dr.
H.J. Robert described several recent aircraft accidents involving confusion
and aberrant pilot behavior caused by ingestion of products containing
aspartame.[13] Soft drink makers were notified of this problem in 1991. It
is interesting to note that after Samuel Skinner left Sidney & Austin,
Searles law firm, he was appointed Secretary of Transportation. Hence, he
was in charge of the FAA, just in time to head off complaints from pilots
affected by aspartame. His wife was employed by Sidney & Austin. Later as
George Bushs Chief of Staff in 1991, during the Gulf War, he was in a
position to head off all inquiries relative to asparatame, no matter where
they were directed - to the FDA, FAA or Department of Defense. This
constitutes criminal negligence and racketeering. George Bush, of course,
was an ex-director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
British News: "Nutrasweet
Tests Faked"
On July 20, 1990, an article in the national British
newspaper The Guardian, entitled "NutraSweet test results faked", revealed
that the British government had finally been persuaded to review the safety
of aspartame after "receiving a dossier of evidence highlighting its
potential dangers." According to The Guardian, the dossier alleged that
laboratory tests were falsified, tumors were removed from laboratory animals
and animals were restored to life in laboratory records.[14] The dossier
against NutraSweet was compiled by Erik Millstone, a lecturer at the Science
Policy Research Unit at Sussex University and author of two books on food
additives. It was based on thousands of pages of evidence, much of which was
obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The COT, Committee on
Toxicity, was at the time looking into consumption of artificial sweeteners
and did not possess the key documents covering alleged mishandling of the
safety tests which Millstone was asked to provide.
The British Ministry of Agriculture and Department
of Health have never revealed the evidence upon which approval was given in
England for the distribution of aspartame, maintaining that "these are
matters of commercial confidence." The British government does not testing
of its own but relies on safety tests provided by the manufacturer, which of
course constitutes a conflict of interest. The 1990 article quoted the
British Department of Health as saying "NutraSweet is not a health hazard on
the available evidence, but people do suffer ideosyncratic reactions to
food additives." Interestingly, it was pointed out that three out of 14
members of the Committee on Toxicity have direct or indirect links with the
artificial sweetener industry, according to David Clark, the Labour Party
Agriculture spokeman, who requested a Parliamentary Answer to address
questions of conflict of interest. Aspartame is also sold in England under
the product name "Canderel." In 1990, the market for asparatame in England
was estimated at £800 million.
|