WASHINGTON (AP) -- After reviewing the safety of one group of pesticides, the
Environmental Protection Agency said Monday that only two of the 30 pose
unreasonable health risks by acting together as cumulative poisons.
``It certainly gives us a high level of confidence in the safety of the food
supply,'' EPA Assistant Administrator Stephen L. Johnson, who oversees the
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, said in an interview with
The Associated Press.
But Johnson said two of the organophosphorus pesticides -- Dichlorvos, or
DDVP, used in pest strips in homes, and Dimethoate, sprayed on dozens of fruits
and vegetables -- could pose health risks to the nervous system, causing
headaches, nausea, weakness or even death.
``If it turns out that our concerns are valid, we will need to take action,''
Johnson said of the two chemicals. ``Banning them certainly is one of the
options.''
Johnson said the findings, released late Monday, were issued just hours after
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Monday
rejected the third industry attempt to bar them from being made public. Phone
calls for comment from one of the plaintiffs -- CropLife America, a trade group
for the pesticides industry -- were not immediately returned.
Natural Resources Defense Council, the New York-based environmental group
whose lawsuit prompted the review, said the EPA had ignored some of the biggest
health risks from the chemicals and failed to adequately consider all of the
threats to children.
Over the past several years, as a result of the EPA's ongoing review, 14 of
49 organophosphorus pesticides have been or will be taken off the market. For
five of the remaining 35, the agency contends there is so little risk of
exposure that the pesticides don't need to be considered for cumulative risks.
NRDC disagrees, saying EPA isn't taking into account -- both for these five
pesticides, and more broadly, for the other 30 organophosphates -- non-dietary
routes of exposure to the pesticides, such as airborne drifts from spraying and
1 million farm kids' frequent contact with them.
``When all the facts come in, it will become clear that EPA must take much
more aggressive action against these poisons in order to protect American's
children,'' said Erik D. Olson, an NRDC senior attorney in Washington. ``Kids
are exposed more, and are more vulnerable to the toxic effects of
organophosphates.''
Johnson said, however, that the EPA believes children are safe. ``Virtually
all the uses of the organophosphates that are remaining pose virtually no risk
to anyone, particularly to children,'' he said.
The EPA's review resulted from a settlement in a 1999 case brought by NRDC,
environmentalists and farm workers. After EPA missed a 1999 deadline to review
the most dangerous pesticides, including those used in foods most eaten by
children, the agency agreed to look at 11 specific pesticides and the cumulative
toxicity of four classes of chemicals, including the organophosphates.
The settlement was reached on Jan. 19, 2001, President Clinton's last full
day in the White House, and has since been upheld twice, by federal district and
appeals courts, in San Francisco.
Industry groups, who were not consulted, had called the settlement an abuse
of power and demanded that the Bush administration withdraw from the consent
decree. But EPA Administrator Christie Whitman looked over the settlement,
decided it was fair, defended it in court and went ahead with the review.
The review marked the first time a federal regulatory agency, rather than
looking at each chemical in isolation, has studied how an entire class of
chemicals might combine with each other in the human body and pose cumulative
hazards.
It excluded data resulting from controversial human testing by industry. The
EPA adopted a temporary policy last December not to consider the data pending
the results of a National Academy of Sciences analysis of the topic due to be
completed a year from now.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"