| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
SHE WAS IN HER mid-40s at the time, and watching her father drift
into the late stages of Alzheimer’s disease (several aunts and uncles had
suffered similar fates). Levitt’s son was about to graduate from high
school, so she called a mail-order company to order fluorescent-light sticks
for him and his friends to wear around their necks at a party. When her
package arrived in the next day’s mail, the receipt and postmark knocked her
flat. She had ordered the same gift a few days earlier—and lost all
recollection of it. “I just freaked,” she says. Suddenly, every forgotten
name, misplaced pencil and misspelled word became a prophecy of doom. Was
she getting Alzheimer’s herself?
When Levitt sought testing at UCLA, researchers gave her the usual
cognitive tests—name some simple objects, repeat a list of words—and assured
her she was fine. But the occasional lapses continued, so she returned to
the same clinic several years later and enrolled in a study aimed at
distinguishing early Alzheimer’s from run-of-the-mill forgetfulness. This
time the researchers didn’t just talk to her. They placed her under a
scanner and recorded detailed images of her brain, both at work and at rest.
Alzheimer’s disease has traditionally been diagnosed by exclusion. If you
lagged significantly on a memory test—and your troubles couldn’t be blamed
on strokes, tumors or drug toxicity—you were given a tentative diagnosis and
sent on your way. To find out for sure, you had to die and have your brain
dissected by a pathologist. Levitt didn’t have to do any of that. By looking
at the images on his video screen, Dr. Gary Small was able to give her some
reassuring news. She didn’t have Alzheimer’s disease—and the odds were less
than 5 percent that she would develop it any time soon. Levitt calls the
images “the most wonderful thing I’ve ever seen.” |
|
| |
|
|
DEAD, TWISTED NEURONS
Technology is changing all of medicine, but it is positively
transforming our understanding of Alzheimer’s. Armed with state-of-the-art
PET scanners and MRI machines, specialists are learning to spot and track
the disease in people who have yet to suffer symptoms. It’s one thing to
chronicle the brain’s disintegration, quite another to stop it, but many
experts are predicting success on both fronts. Drugmakers now have two dozen
treatments in development. And unlike today’s medications, which offer only
a brief respite from symptoms, many of the new ones are intended to stall
progression of the disease. As Alzheimer’s runs its decades-long course, it
replaces the brain’s exquisite circuitry with mounds of sticky plaque and
expanses of dead, twisted neurons. No drug will repair that kind of damage.
But if the new treatments work as anticipated, they’ll enable us to stop or
slow the destruction while our minds are still intact. A decade from now,
says Dr. Dennis Selkoe of Harvard Medical School and Boston’s Brigham and
Women’s Hospital, physicians may monitor our brain health as closely as our
cholesterol levels—and stave off Alzheimer’s with a wave of the prescription
pad. |
|
|
|
Until we can control this awful
illness, early detection may seem a fool’s errand. “With diagnostics ahead
of therapeutics, there’s a lot of potential for harm,” says University of
Pennsylvania ethicist Arthur Caplan. He worries that entrepreneurs will
peddle testing without counseling, leaving patients devastated by the
findings. He wonders, too, whether employers and insurers will abandon
people whose scans show signs of trouble. Advocates counter that early
detection can help patients make the most of today’s treatments while giving
them time to adjust their plans and expectations. With so many people at
risk, they say, anything is better than nothing. Some 4 million Americans
have Alzheimer’s today, but the number could hit 14 million by 2050 as the
elderly population expands. |
|
| |
Alzheimer's patients
like Fernando Martinez, 86, may benefit from new drugs that are intended to
stall the progression of the disease
|
|
The diagnostic revolution began during the 1990s, as researchers
learned to monitor neurons with an imaging technique called PET, or
positron-emission tomography. Unlike an X-ray or CT imaging, PET records
brain activity by homing in on the glucose that fuels it. And as Small’s
team has discovered, it can spot significant pathology in people who are
still functioning normally. Instead of glowing with activity, the middle
sections of their brains appear dim and torpid. And because Alzheimer’s is
progressive, abnormal scans tend to become more so with time. In a study
published last fall, UCLA researchers scanned 284 people who had suffered
only minor memory problems. The images predicted, with 95 percent accuracy,
which people would experience dementia within three and a half years.
|
|
|
| |
|
|

PET scanning has yet to transform patient care; few clinics have the
machines, and Medicare doesn’t cover their use. But scientists are now using
the technique to see whether drugs already on the market (such as the
anti-inflammatory ibuprofen) can slow the brain’s decline. And PET is just
one of several potential strategies for tracking preclinical Alzheimer’s.
San Die-go researchers have found that seniors who score inconsistently on
different mental tests are at increased risk of dementia—even if their
scores are generally high. And in a study published this spring, researchers
at the Oregon Health Sciences University hit upon three signs of imminent
decline in octogenarians. The 108 participants were all healthy at the start
of the study, but nearly half were demented six years later. As it turned
out, they had entered the study with certain traits in common. They walked
more slowly than their peers, requiring nearly two extra seconds for a
30-foot stroll. They lagged slightly on memory tests. And their MRI scans
revealed a slight shrinkage of the hippocampus, a small, seahorse-shaped
brain structure that is critical to memory processing. The changes were
subtle, says Dr. Jeffrey Kaye, the neurologist who directed the study, but
they presaged changes that were catastrophic. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video Gallery |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
DETECTING DAMAGE
Powerful as they are, today’s tests show only that the
brain is losing steam. The ideal test would reveal the underlying pathology,
letting a specialist determine how much healthy tissue has been replaced by
the plaques and tangles of Alzheimer’s. It’s not hard to fashion a molecule
that will highlight the wreckage. Unfortunately, it’s almost impossible to
get such a probe through the ultrafine screen that separates the brain from
the bloodstream. If a probe is complex enough to pick out plaques and
tangles, chances are it’s too large to pass from the bloodstream into the
brain. At UCLA and the University of Pittsburgh, researchers have developed
probes that are small enough to get through, yet selective enough to provide
at least a rough measure of a person’s plaque burden. At Brigham and Women’s
Hospital, meanwhile, radiologist Ferenc Jolesz is trying to open the barrier
to bigger, better probes. His technique employs tiny lipid bubbles that
gather at the gateway to the brain when injected into the bloodstream. The
bubbles burst when zapped with ultrasound, loosening the mesh of that
ultrafine screen and allowing the amyloid probe to enter. Lab tests suggest
the screen will repair itself within a day, but no one yet knows whether
it’s safe to leave it open that long. |
|
| |
New state-of-the-art
PET scanners and MRI machines will help specialists to spot and track
Alzheimer's in patients like Ruth Carsman, 83, who suffers from the disease
|
|
One way or another, many of us now seem destined to learn we have
Alzheimer’s disease while we’re still of sound mind. The question is whether
we’ll be able to do anything more constructive than setting our affairs in
order and taking a drug like Aricept to ease the early symptoms. Fortunately
the possibilities for therapy are changing almost as fast as the diagnostic
arts. Experts now think of Alzheimer’s not as a sudden calamity but as a
decades-long process involving at least a half-dozen steps—each of which
provides a target for intervention. Slowing the disease may require four or
five drugs rather than one. But as AIDS specialists have shown, the right
combination can sometimes turn a killer into a mere menace.
|
|
|
Alzheimer’s patients go
back in time
May 3, 2002 — One new approach has made a
very big difference for patients and their families. NBC’s Jim Cummins
reports. |
Though experts still quarrel about the ultimate cause of
Alzheimer’s, many agree that the trouble starts with a scrap of junk protein
called amyloid beta (A-beta for short). Each of us produces the stuff, and
small amounts are harmless. But as A-beta builds up in the brain, it sets
off a destructive cascade, replacing healthy tissue with the plaques seen in
Alzheimer’s sufferers. No one knew where this pesky filament came from until
1987, when researchers discovered it was part of a larger molecule they
dubbed the amyloid-precursor protein (APP). Thanks to more recent
discoveries, they now know exactly how the parent molecule spawns its
malevolent offspring.
APP is a normal protein that hangs from a neuron’s outer membrane
like a worm with its head in an apple. While performing its duties in and
around the cell, it gets chopped up by enzymes called secretases, leaving
residues that dissolve in the brain’s watery recesses. Occasionally,
however, a pair of enzymes called beta and gamma secretase cleave APP in
just the wrong places, leaving behind an insoluble A-beta fragment. Some
people produce these junk proteins faster than others, but after seven or
eight decades of service, even the healthiest brain carries an amyloid
burden. When it reaches a certain threshold, the brain can no longer
function. That’s why Alzheimer’s dementia is so rampant among the elderly.
Given enough time, anyone would develop it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
Alzheimer's is a degenerative brain disease that usually begins
gradually, causing a person to forget recent events or familiar
tasks. How rapidly it advances varies from person to person, but the
disease eventually leads to confusion, personality and behavior
changes and impaired judgment. Communication becomes more difficult
as the disease progresses, leaving those affected struggling to find
words, finish thoughts or follow directions. Eventually, most people
with Alzheimer’s disease become unable to care for themselves.
One in 10 people over 65 and nearly half of those over 85 suffer
from Alzheimer’s disease. Today, 4 million Americans have the
condition. That number could jump to 14 million by the year 2050
unless prevention methods are developed.
Scientists still are not certain of the disease's cause. Advancing
age and family history are risk factors. Researchers are exploring
the role of genetics in the disease, but most agree it's caused by a
variety of factors.
There is no single, comprehensive diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s
disease. Instead, doctors rule out other conditions through a
process of elimination. They usually conduct physical, psychological
and neurological exams and take a thorough medical history.
Diagnosis is about 90 percent accurate, but the only way to confirm
it is through autopsy.
There is no medical treatment currently available to cure or stop
the progression of Alzheimer's disease. There are currently four
FDA-approved Alzheimer's drugs -- Cognex, Aricept, Exelon and
Reminyl -- that may temporarily relieve some symptoms of the
disease. Several other drugs are in development.
Common symptoms of Alzheimer's disease include:
- Memory loss that affects job skills
- Difficulty performing familiar tasks
- Problems with language
- Disorientation to time and place
- Poor or decreased judgment
- Problems with abstract thinking
- Placing items in inappropriate places
- Rapid changes in mood or behavior
- Dramatic changes in personality
- Loss of initiative
|

Source:
Alzheimer's Association |
|
Printable version |
The ideal
Alzheimer’s remedy would simply slow the production of A-beta—by disabling
the enzymes that fabricate it. Elan Corp. was the first drugmaker to try
this tack. During the mid-’90s its scientists developed several gamma-secretase
blockers and tested them in animals—only to find that they sometimes
derailed normal cell development, damaging bone marrow and digestive
tissues. A few companies are still pursuing gamma blockers, but beta
secretase now looks like a safer target for therapy. More than a half-dozen
drugmakers are now working on beta inhibitors. “In the industry,” says Dr.
Ivan Lieberburg of Elan, “we’re hoping that the beta-secretase inhibitors
will have as much therapeutic potential as the statins.” Those, of course,
are the cholesterol-lowering medicines for which 35 million Americans are
now candidates.
Secretase inhibitors may be our best hope of warding off
Alzheimer’s, but they’re not the only hope. As scientists learn more about
the behavior of A-beta, they’re seeing opportunities to disarm it before it
causes harm. One thing that makes A-beta fragments dangerous is their
tendency to bind with one another to form tough, stringy fibrils, which then
stick together to create still larger masses. Three companies are now
testing compounds designed to keep A-beta from forming fibrils—and at least
two other firms are working to keep fibrils from aggregating to create
plaque. All of their experimental drugs have helped reduce amyloid buildup
in plaque-prone mice, suggesting they might help people as well. But human
studies are just now getting underway.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next Frontiers: Health and Medicine |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
NEWSWEEK explores new science that lets doctors detect
Alzheimer's and improve eyesight, hearing and speech.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Suppose for a moment that all these strategies fail, and
that amyloid buildup is simply part of the human condition. As Selkoe likes
to say, there’s more than one way to keep a bathtub from overflowing. If you
can’t turn down the faucet, you can always try opening the drain.
Recognizing that most of the people now threatened by Alzheimer’s have
already spent their lives under open amyloid faucets, researchers are
pursuing several strategies for clearing deposits from the brain. One
elegant idea is to mobilize the immune system. Three years ago Elan wowed
the world by showing that animals given an anti-amyloid vaccine mounted
fierce attacks on their plaques. Vaccinated mice reduced their amyloid
burdens by an astounding 96 percent in just three months. The vaccine proved
toxic in people, triggering attacks on normal tissue as well as plaque, but
the dream isn’t dead. Both Elan and Eli Lilly are now developing ready-made
antibodies that, if successful, will target amyloid for removal from the
brain without triggering broader attacks by the immune system.
Even later interventions may be possible. As a person’s amyloid
burden rises, so does the concentration of glutamate in the brain. This
neurotransmitter helps lock in memories when it’s released in short bursts,
but it kills neurons when chronically elevated. At least two teams are now
betting they can rescue cells surrounded by amyloid, simply by shielding
them from glutamate. One possible life jacket is a drug called Memantine,
which is already approved in Europe. It covers a receptor that lets
glutamate flow freely into neurons, but without blocking the glutamate
bursts needed for learning and memory. New York’s Forest Laboratories is now
launching an American trial of the drug, and hoping for approval by next
year.
If even half these treatments fulfill their promise, old age may
prove more pleasant than today’s projections suggest. For now, the best we
can expect is an early warning and perhaps a year or two of symptomatic
relief. That may seem a paltry offering, but it’s a far cry from nothing. As
Small argues in a forthcoming book called “The Memory Bible,” people at
early stages of Alzheimer’s can do a lot to improve their lives, but few of
them get the chance. Three out of four are already past the “moderate” stage
by the time their conditions are recognized. Some may find solace in
ignorance. But the case for vigilance is getting stronger every day.
With Anne Underwood and Andrew Murr
© 2002 Newsweek, Inc.
|
|
| |