Vaccination News Home Page

http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v287n24/abs/jbr20117.html


LoginJournals of AMA HomeFeedbackSite Map

SubscribeRegisterSearchDocument DeliveryE-Mail AlertClassified
How to use this site
Previous Vol. 287 No. 24,
June 26, 2002

No Next
JAMACurrent IssueIndexesPast Issue Index
Brief Report


 


 
Printable version of this item
 
View Full Text

 

See Related:
Authors' Articles
 


 

 
Return to
Table of Contents

 

 
Author/Article Information
 

to bottom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
to TOP

 
Author/Article Information
 

to bottom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
Content and Design Attributes of Antivaccination Web Sites  
 
 
Author Information  Robert M. Wolfe, MD; Lisa K. Sharp, PhD; Martin S. Lipsky, MD

 

Context  Individuals searching the Internet for vaccine information may find antivaccination Web sites. Few published studies have systematically evaluated these sites.

Objectives  To examine antivaccination Web site attributes and to delineate the specific claims and concerns expressed by antivaccination groups.

Design and Setting  In late 2000, using a metasearch program that incorporates 10 other search engines, we reviewed and analyzed 772 links to find 12 Web sites that promulgated antivaccination information. Analyzing links from these 12 sites yielded another 10 sites, producing a total of 22 sites for study. Using a standardized form, 2 authors (R.M.W., L.K.S.) systematically evaluated these sites based on specific content and design attributes.

Main Outcome Measures  Presence or absence of 11 Web site content attributes (antivaccination claims) and 10 Web site design attributes.

Results  The most commonly found content claims were that vaccines cause idiopathic illness (100% of sites), vaccines erode immunity (95%), adverse vaccine reactions are underreported (95%), and vaccination policy is motivated by profit (91%). The most common design attributes were the presence of links to other antivaccination sites (100%of sites), information for legally avoiding immunizations (64%), and the use of emotionally charged stories of children who had allegedly been killed or harmed by vaccines (55%).

Conclusion  Antivaccination Web sites express a range of concerns related to vaccine safety and varying levels of distrust in medicine. The sites rely heavily on emotional appeal to convey their message.

JAMA. 2002;287:3245-3248

View Full Text    
 
 
Author/Article Information

 
 
Author Affiliations: Department of Family Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (Drs Wolfe, Sharp, and Lipsky); Evanston-Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Ill (Drs Wolfe and Lipsky).
 
Corresponding Author and Reprints: Robert M. Wolfe, MD, Department of Family Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 710 N Lake Shore Dr, Room 1417, Chicago, IL 60611 (e-mail: r-wolfe@northwestern.edu).

Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Wolfe, Sharp.

Acquisition of data: Wolfe, Sharp.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Wolfe, Sharp, Lipsky.

Drafting of the manuscript: Wolfe, Sharp.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Wolfe, Sharp, Lipsky.

Statistical expertise: Sharp.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Wolfe, Sharp, Lipsky.




 


 
 
to Top
 
 

 

 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
 
 
AMA HomeJAMA Info Centers Home Short Cut

Go

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.