Allowing Lotronex Back on the Market Will Endanger Patients
Drug Reintroduction Program Weak; Offers Little Protection or Oversight
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Reintroducing Lotronex onto the market as announced today
by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will endanger patients, Public
Citizen said today. Not only is the new marketing program too lax to prevent
harm, but it is to be overseen by the company that makes the drug - a poor idea
because the company has a financial incentive to downplay problems with the
drug. Also, the recommended dose has not been shown to be effective.
Lotronex, approved in February 2000 to treat irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
for women with diarrhea as the predominant symptom, was withdrawn from the
market in November 2000 because of dangerous adverse effects experienced by some
patients taking it. Public Citizen in August 2000 petitioned the FDA to remove
the drug because of evidence that it caused ischemic colitis, a life-threatening
condition in which bowel tissue dies as a result of a lack of blood flow to the
colon. Many patients were hospitalized and suffered permanent injuries.
Today, the FDA announced plans to reintroduce Lotronex at a recommended dose
of 1 milligram (mg) per day. However, studies conducted prior to the original
approval showed no evidence that the 1 mg daily dose is significantly better
than a placebo. Further, the trials showed an increased risk of adverse effects
at the 1 mg dose - a four-fold increase in constipation severe enough to cause
the patients to withdraw from the study - compared with placebo. Thus, the newly
approved starting dose of 1 mg per day lacks the proper evidence of efficacy
required by the 1962 FDA Drug Efficacy Amendments but causes a significantly
greater incidence of severe constipation. In addition, in 12 percent of the
first 70 cases of ischemic colitis reported to the FDA, the patient was using
the 1 mg per day dose approved for the new marketing plan.
Under the guidelines announced today, physicians who want to prescribe the
drug must state that they are qualified to diagnose IBS and manage ischemic
colitis and that they understand the risks associated with Lotronex. The doctors
also must promise to educate patients about the risks and obtain their
signatures on a patient-physician agreement.
However, no one is required to verify the doctors' qualifications or check to
ensure patients have been informed of the drug's risks. Further, there will be
no mandatory tracking of patients to see if they develop adverse effects.
Finally, the entity administering the program will be GlaxoSmithKline, the
drug's manufacturer.
"This is a classic case of the fox guarding the hen house," said Larry Sasich,
a pharmacist and research analyst with Public Citizen's Health Research Group. "GlaxoSmithKline
has a huge stake in this drug and wants it to succeed. The company should not be
overseeing the patient safety program."
Instead, the FDA should have limited the drug to research status, which
requires tight controls on who receives a drug and documentation of the
effectiveness and safety of a drug. Under that status, the FDA should have
limited the drug to women who had previously used it and experienced no adverse
effects, Sasich said.
Also, at a minimum, the risk management program should be restricted to
registered gastroenterologists, Sasich said. There should be a patient registry,
and the pharmacies that dispense the drug also should be registered with the
FDA.
"We are quite fearful for patients," Sasich said. "Unfortunately, the FDA's
action will almost surely lead to more injuries and possibly deaths associated
with this drug."
NOTE: If you no longer wish to receive press releases from Public Citizen,
please send an email to the above address and type "unsubscribe" in the subject
field.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"