xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
http://id.medscape.com/reuters/prof/2001/05/05.29/20010528drgd003.html
HIV-1 Tat Gene Expressed in Plants Has
Potential For Vaccine
ORLANDO, FL (Reuters Health) May 28 - Immunologically
reactive HIV-1 tat protein is expressible by plants and may become an important
component of vaccines, investigators reported at the 101st general
meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.
In a poster session here, Dr. Alexander V. Karasev
presented results of research he and his colleagues conducted at Thomas Jefferson
University, in Doylestown, Pennsylvania. Using synthetic primers, the
researchers assembled the tat gene of a strain of HIV-1 and cloned it into a
tobacco mosaic virus-based vector.
Inoculation of the vector into leaves of Nicotiana
benthamiana and spinach resulted in the expression of approximately 330 µg of
extractable protein per gram of leaf tissue, which the researchers note is at
least as high a yield as that produced in animal tissue cultures. Further study
showed the tat protein was reactive with tat-specific monoclonal antibodies.
Only recently has the technology become available to
produce biomedical products and vaccine components in plants, Dr. Karasev told
Reuters Health in an interview. He noted that other researchers have used
transgenic plants in which target proteins are expressed constitutively.
When we use virus vectors, we have transient expression
and can control the time span when we want the protein produced, he said. One
advantage of our process is the public concern about transgenic plants in
general. Its still an obstacle. In our case we use normal plants, the only
thing we manipulate are the virus vectors.
The other advantage of using plants, Dr. Karasev added, is
that nothing can be more safe. That is because microbes harbored by plants
are not pathogenic to humans.
When vaccine components are produced in animal or human
cells, there is always the underlying fear of contamination...because even if
we use screening procedures, we can only test against something of which were
aware. If theres something present for which we have no testing systems, we
can miss something potentially pathogenic.
Vaccine component production in plants is also less expensive,
and it is possible that resulting vaccines could be administered orally, the
investigators note.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.