http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/29/sc.floridasmokers/index.html

 

U.S. Supreme Court rejects tobacco appeal

June 29, 2001 Posted: 12:03 PM EDT (1603 GMT)


Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.com

Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article

Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article

View a list of the most popular articles on our siteView a list of the most popular articles on our site


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Friday rejected an appeal by one of the nation's largest tobacco companies, which sought to overturn a landmark verdict in favor of a former Florida smoker who lost a lung to cancer.

The court refused to hear the appeal by Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., a unit of British American Tobacco PLC, the world's second-largest cigarette company, in the product liability lawsuit won by Grady Carter, who was awarded $750,000 in damages.

The justices, without comment, let stand a Florida Supreme Court ruling that reinstated the jury award to Carter, 70, a retired air traffic controller from Orange Park, Fla. It was the second verdict ever against a cigarette maker in a smoking case.

The court denied the Brown & Williamson appeal a day after it gave the tobacco industry an important victory by striking down Massachusetts advertising restrictions at retail outlets and outdoor sites near schools and playgrounds.

  LEGAL RESOURCES


Latest Legal News


Law Library


FindLaw Consumer Center

Bottom of Form

 

Carter, who started smoking Brown & Williamson's Lucky Strike cigarettes at age 16, gave up smoking only after he had been diagnosed with lung cancer in 1991.

He sued the Louisville-based company in 1995 and a jury in Jacksonville awarded $750,000 in damages the next year, finding that cigarettes are defective and that the manufacturer had negligently failed to warn people about the dangers of smoking.

In appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, Brown & Williamson argued the liability award against it was barred by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1969.

A state appeals court reversed the award nearly two years later, saying Carter had waited too long to go to court. Last fall, the court reversed again and reinstated Carter's victory.

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.