http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/29/sc.floridasmokers/index.html
June 29, 2001 Posted: 12:03 PM EDT (1603 GMT)
|
|
||
|
|
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Friday rejected an appeal by
one of the nation's largest tobacco companies, which sought to overturn a
landmark verdict in favor of a former Florida smoker who lost a lung to cancer.
The court refused to hear the appeal by Brown & Williamson Tobacco
Corp., a unit of British American Tobacco PLC, the world's second-largest
cigarette company, in the product liability lawsuit won by Grady Carter, who
was awarded $750,000 in damages.
The justices, without comment, let stand a Florida Supreme Court ruling that
reinstated the jury award to Carter, 70, a retired air traffic controller from
Orange Park, Fla. It was the second verdict ever against a cigarette maker in a
smoking case.
The court denied the Brown & Williamson appeal a day after it gave the
tobacco industry an important victory by striking down Massachusetts
advertising restrictions at retail outlets and outdoor sites near schools and
playgrounds.
|
|
LEGAL RESOURCES |
|
|
|
Carter, who started smoking Brown
& Williamson's Lucky Strike cigarettes at age 16, gave up smoking only
after he had been diagnosed with lung cancer in 1991.
He sued the Louisville-based company in 1995 and a jury in Jacksonville awarded
$750,000 in damages the next year, finding that cigarettes are defective and
that the manufacturer had negligently failed to warn people about the dangers
of smoking.
In appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, Brown & Williamson argued the
liability award against it was barred by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and
Advertising Act of 1969.
A state appeals court reversed the award nearly two years later, saying
Carter had waited too long to go to court. Last fall, the court reversed again
and reinstated Carter's victory.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.