http://www.latimes.com/wires/winternat/20010623/tCB00V2415.html
U.N. Holds Special Session on AIDS
UNITED
NATIONS
"Everyone has come
to this late," said Stephen Lewis, the U.N. special envoy on HIV/AIDS in
Africa. "The world has been seized and galvanized only over the last 18
months or so."
With the killer disease
ravaging Africa and spreading quickly through Asia, Latin America and Eastern
Europe, high-level representatives from 180 countries will meet at U.N.
headquarters starting Monday to adopt new targets for a global campaign to halt
and start reversing the AIDS epidemic.
But governments, health
experts, and activists remain divided on what should get the lion's share of
funds and attention -treatment or prevention. And Muslim and Western nations
are still at loggerheads over naming groups most vulnerable to AIDS -such as
homosexuals and prostitutes -because of religious and cultural sensitivities.
Nonetheless, Lewis and
other U.N. officials believe that a constellation of recent events offers the
first real chance to turn a doomsday scenario around, albeit slowly and
painfully.
The Security Council
declared last year that AIDS poses a threat to peace and security.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan made the fight against AIDS his personal priority
and helped put a global spotlight on the issue. Prices for drugs have
plummeted, opening new options for treatment. And in Africa, which has been
hardest-hit by the disease, leaders have shown a determination in the past year
to confront the epidemic.
Although the U.N.
General Assembly special session on HIV/AIDS is not a summit, two dozen
presidents and prime ministers are coming, the vast majority from Africa,
including some of the worst-hit countries -Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, Botswana,
Lesotho and Swaziland.
However, President
Thabo Mbeki of South Africa -which has the largest number of people living with
HIV or AIDS, 4.1 million -will not attend, a presidential spokesman said
Saturday, saying senior officials will be sent instead. Mbeki caused an
international uproar more than a year ago when he courted the view of some
scientists who question the link between HIV and AIDS and believe HIV testing
should be stopped.
More than 3,000
government officials, activists and business leaders will also be at the United
Nations for the three-day session. Secretary of State Colin Powell heads the
large U.S. delegation.
"It's leadership
that will ultimately be the driving force that will reverse and eventually halt
the devastation of this epidemic," said Peter Piot, executive director of
the Joint U.N. Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), which operates in over 100
countries.
There is a new momentum
among political leaders and public health officials to tackle the AIDS crisis,
he said, "but what is truly astounding is the leadership we are seeing at
the community level, and in grassroots organizations."
For example, people
living with HIV in Burundi, Uganda and the Caribbean have set up support groups
that have become major players in AIDS prevention and care. Youth sports
programs in Nairobi and university students in India are promoting AIDS
prevention. In the Philippines, legislators passed a law spelling out what the
government, local communities and religious groups need to do to fight AIDS
-and this model is now being adopted by many countries, Piot said.
In addition to
leadership, the resource needed most to defeat AIDS is money.
At last September's
U.N. Millennium Summit, over 150 world leaders made a commitment to stop the
spread of HIV/AIDS by 2015.
The declaration to be
adopted at the close of the special session on Wednesday calls for interim
targets, including a 25 percent reduction in HIV infections among 15 - to 24
-year-olds in the most affected countries by 2005 and globally by 2010. It also
calls for at least 90 percent of 15 - to 24 -year-olds to have access to
information and services to reduce their vulnerability by 2005, and a 20
percent reduction in the proportion of infants infected with HIV by that date.
To do this, Annan said
an annual war chest of $7 to 10 billion is needed.
A study published
Friday in the journal Science said the world's poorest countries will need $9.2
billion a year to deal with AIDS - $4.4 billion to treat people with the
illness and $4.8 billion to prevent new infections.
Part of this money will
be raised by governments themselves, but Annan hopes most will come from the
international community and has called for a global fund. Even before it has
been formally established, the fund has received pledges of $528 million -and
more are expected during the special session.
Already, there are
differences over how the money should be spent -prevention or treatment.
The Health Gap
Coalition, a network of U.S.-based AIDS activists, wants the fund to buy bulk
drugs at the best world price, regardless of their patent status.
Pharmaceutical companies and some governments object to this approach.
Thoraya Obaid,
executive director of the U.N. Population Fund, wants the global AIDS fund to
finance the purchase of condoms. U.N. officials say there is a serious shortage
of condoms because the Population Fund hasn't received adequate funding to buy
them.
"Prevention is the
main key to ensure that this disease does not spread in other regions as a
pandemic," she said. Prevention is cheap because it mainly involves
changes in behavior to promote abstinence, one sex partner, delaying the age of
sexual relations, or safe sex with condoms.
Negotiators are also
still trying to bridge differences in the final declaration over references to
human rights, the empowerment of women, and explicitly identifying groups most
susceptible to HIV.
"Moral
squeamishness shouldn't stand in the way of finding solutions to this terrible
crisis," said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch.
"At a conference devoted to fighting AIDS, governments must not replicate
the silence and denial that have driven the spread of the disease."
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.