Many parents have
been charged with murder for allegedly shaking their babies to death, but
medical evidence suggests that vaccinations are to blame in a large number of
Nexus Magazine, Volume 7, Number 6 (October-November 2000) or November-December
2000 in the USA only, PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia,.
email@example.com, Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442
9381, From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com
Father didn't shake his son
Published in The Courier-News 9/2/1998
By SHARON SILKE
A jury on Tuesday cleared a Warren County man who was accused of inflicting
brain damage on his son by shaking the then 5-month-old baby. William Carey was
charged in March 1996 with second-degree aggravated assault and endangering the
welfare of a child a week after his son suffered seizures and was rushed to the
hospital. Doctors at Robert Wood Johnson University Medical Center detected
hemorrhages behind the 5-month-old boy`s eyes and determined the cause was
shaken-baby syndrome. The baby had received an immunization earlier that
morning, which defense attorneys argued was the cause of the seizures and the
bleeding behind the boy`s eyes.
"I think the
weight of the world was lifted from the Carey`s shoulders," defense
attorney Joe Krakora said outside the courthouse in Flemington on Tuesday after
the 12-day trial. "They`re extremely relieved and tremendously
grateful." Carey, a former Union County police officer who used to live in
Readington, now resides in Washington Township in Warren County. The son, who
is nearly 3, is developmentally disabled. It took the Superior Court jury
nearly two full days to reach a decision. Jurors returned to the Judge Marilyn
Rhine Herr`s courtroom three times to watch videotaped testimony from witnesses
from both the prosecution and the defense. Assistant Prosecutor Marcia Crowe
could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
The baby was born
in October 1995, and was first brought to the hospital on Dec. 11, 1995. He was
treated for vomiting and irritability, and his pediatrician determined that the
boy had a nonspecific viral condition and an allergy to milk. He was brought
back to the hospital on March 22, 1996, by paramedics after he suffered a
seizure. The boy had received an inoculation a few hours earlier, which
witnesses for both sides agreed could trigger a seizure in babies who had
suffered head trauma. Vomiting, lethargy, increasing head circumference,
seizures, apnea and coma are all symptoms of shaken-baby syndrome. According to
medical records, the boy was demonstrating some of those symptoms during his December
1995 visit to the hospital. But Krakora argued that these symptoms also could
have been a sign that the boy had some other neurological problem that wasn`t
picked up by doctors.
Published: September 02, 1998
to all of you from Alan Yurko
Alan Yurko sent
me this and asked me to type this up and send it out all over the PLANET..
Please read this
carefully and take it to heart and become involved ANY WAY you can - it could
be you or your family or your baby.
We are all one
family after all!
Sheri Nakken, RN, MA
(sorry if there are typos as I was trying to type fast to get this out)
Please write to Alan!
Alan R. Yurko AX13917-C1-112UP (the numbers should follow the name)
Washington Correctional Institution
4455 Sam Mitchell Drive
Chipley, Florida 32428-3501
I just received
your email today, as they say here in the big house "Good Lookin
Out". Thank you for adding my wife and I to the elists. That helps! I hope
to establish a solid and steady contact with you . It seems that your name is
very active in the battle. It seems also that I see some of the same names over
and over. (Alan lists 10 names)
Yes, it makes me
wonder if these names and maybe 10 other names are the entire population of
vaccine awareness activists? I know there are thousands of people out there who
should be actively putting their foot up the arse of the vaccine juggernaut.
How do I know? Because sitting next to me are enough VAERS reports to build a Macy's
Thanksgiving float! Every parent and every member of every family whose
children ahve been murdered or maimed by compulsory poisons should be at arms.
Over 900 million dollars awarded from the NVICP! How much of that money is
given back to help our groups? And what about the families who are denied any
financial recompense because the reaction happened past 72 hours. We all kow
the latent period is a joke! Anyone who wants to debate this, I'll gladly shove
about 85 orthodox published studies from 1924 till presnt up their nose, and
they better bring more evidence than Cherry, Baraff & Menkes because these
studies don't hold water. Dr. Mark Geier won't even challenge it! (Dr. Mark
Geier, a proponent of the 3-day latent period (DPT) is unable to defend his
position with mine. He has bowed out of our discourse on the subject).
Do I sound angry?
You bet your sweet bippie I am!
Our children are
being devoluted and malformed. The medical community, pharmanazis and our
govenment are playing the lottery with our offspring. I know people have to
live and bills are high, but c'mon people! There's more than just (Alan lists
names, that I won't list here) out there! Maybe I'm not seeing something?
I accept challenge number 1. Shaken Baby Judgements and sentences may be
vaccine damages. As I pondered your email, I thought, "What the hell can
these people do for them anyway?" The answer is, unfortunately, 'not
much'. Then bells rang in my head! ME! I know the laws vividly. I have 100+ references,
scores of case law, I've reserached the juxtapositions. I know things that most
lawyers don't as far as defensive strategies. I've lived it every day for three
years. I have an armada of legal contacts. I know the medical literature better
than I know my own name. I have 100's of references, studies, rebuttals. I know
the researchers. I correspond with scores of experts worldwide. I know the
neuroscience, clinical presentations, QER ratings, current trends,
prosecutorial guidelines, fatal mechanisms, microbiologies, immunologies,
neuropathologies, forensics, chemical profiles. I know the many differential
diagnoses NOT given in the literature. I'm a walking SBS defense, medico-legal
database! Who better to help out?
Here's what I can
As people notify you of possible SBS cases that seem to fit a possible scenario
of innocence, forward my name and contact info. If lawyers, or families want
some help from the voice of experience which has been forced upon me, I will do
this. I cannot offer advice but I can let them know what I would do, and give
possible resources. I can direct them to studies and case laws that may apply.
I can help them find the right experts and share my experience with them. I'm
not interested in helping actual abusers, but I can open some eyes and point to
some invaluable resources.
Here are some
questions: Why all of a sudden in the last 25-30 years are parents shaking
their babies? Caffey didn't report on the whiplash shaken syndrome until 1974.
Through the decades upon decades of human history, why all of a sudden in the
last 30 years, has SBS been even hinted at?
Could increased friability and fragility of the vaxscular system play a part?
Yes, this is pure speculation, but for those of you who undertand the effects
of endotoxins on the vascular & microvascular sytems, you know exactly what
Of course these
questions are completely rhetorical. I only state them for stimulation. I guess
I'm writing this in hopes you will put it thru the elists. Being a paralegal with
a pre-med background has, as you've said Sheri, puts me in a prime position to
do battle. It doesn't make me any better or any more informed than other
credentialed experts, but it does give me one helluvan edge. I cannot give
medical or legal advice, but I can give my opinion. I don't claim to know
everything. There are areas I'm still green in. Such as, the efefcts of mineral
corticoids on neovascularization and the antioxidant/free radical exchange
effects in traumatic brain injury. But every day I learn a little more. I find
out who the enemies and allies and neutrals are. I am not an expert, nor claim
to be, but what can really be done by our vax groups to help people? Most of us
know about vax dangers, but do you know how they relate and correlate to SBS?
The subject is obscure. The science is in its infancy and there is only a
handful of neonatologists or pediatric pathologists in the country and world
who have much experience with it. I've been forced to research it, and that I
do, 12-16 hrs a day, 24-7-365. Frankly, if my tragedy never happened, or I was
acquitted, I'd probably be blissfully ignorant and shaking our pediatrician's
hand as he vaccinated my children, and ecouraging my wife to get a flu shot
with firm belief in the medical mafia and lies of Louis Pasteur.
Ive thought about
including a list of lawyers and doctrs to start an SBS defense database. I have
some reservations about putting my contacts and doctors on this list. Not out
of selfishness, but because, you must understand, each case has different
issues and some issues are supported by some and not supported by others. For
example, Dr. Mark Geier doesn't support the post 72 hour period. A case where
its an 11-13 day reaction would be shot down by him, and possibly be adverse in
itself. Many doctors have ties to the parmanazis and to prosecutors. One has to
know which expert to consult for each issue. I've contacted 1,000's of
hospitals, medical schools and private experts. My trial and error has had some
of these things work against me. Here, my knowledge is invaluable. There are
dangers in people randomly contacting lawyers and experts. Also, most, if not
all of these people charge substantial sums. Some more than others. However,
there are many whom will do things pro bono. Putting these people on a list
would desensitze their good nature if they were contacted by repeated persons.
Not everyone is innocent. I venture to say 15-20%.
What I'm finding
out as I correspond with lawyers and doctors from America to New Zealand is
that there is one linear facet that is essential in winning an SBS case. Every
single time I hear about a lost case, its blamed on one common thing. Lack of
records. One must get the entire maternal, prenatal, pediatric, terminal
admission, antemortem and postmortem records. Exclusion of any one of these is
fatal to the case. Prenatal, perinatal and terminal blood and chemical profiles
as well as clinical presentations must be painstakingly compared by a
methodical expert. Arguments on diffuse-axonal injuray, retinal hermorrhages,
long-bone fractures, ICH (intracranial hemorrhage) dating, differential
diagnosis, CT/MRI interpretations & EXTENSIVE histories must be given by
all caretakers no matter how partial their role in the child's life was. Case
laws for each state must be considered since they vary (ie. only 14 states
consider the record preserved outside of contemporaneous objection in lieu of a
motion/order in limine). One expert is NOT enough. Its a numbers case. The
state will have the ME (medical examiner), a neuropathologist, radiologist,
pediatrician and child abuse expert as well as possibly an opthalmologist,
perinatologist or neonatologist. Don't be naive to think that since your one
expert who has 220 published articles, dual professorships at a major
universtiy, a fellow in the Royal Society of Medicine, several certifications
and awards as well as being revered by the medical community, among other
things, is gonna be able to win against 4 or 5 local physicians (See State of
Florida vs. Alan Yurko). Don't think because you're innocent that justice will
reign, or that the truth will set you free. Don't think doctors won't lie. It's
a game to them. A very profitable game. $400-600 an hour is not uncommon. The
doctors make way more than the lawyres. Don't trust your lawyer. You should
breathe down his neck. He's not the boss, you are. Commit to memory the rules
governing your State Bar's conduct for lawyers and let your lawyer know you
will file a complaint at the slightest infraction. Once you read those rules
you will see that you really are the boss. I could go on for days about
that.one. The dating issue is integral. Prosecutors fear this. Dating the ICH
(intracranial hemorrhage) is the difference between acquittal and conviction in
many cases. You must know what the literature says about ante- &
post-mortem dating of SH (subdural hematoma), SAH (?subarachnoid hematoma), and
all ICH (intracranial hemorrhage). Most times the ME (medical examiner) will
lie - you must be able to catch him on this. As a defense, you must take the
offensive. You must destroy the states credibility. That's what they're gonna
do to you. Another fact is that the state has UNLIMITED funds. They can hire
whoever they want and you can bet your marbles they'll say whatever the state
wants at $500 per hour. It's a buddy system. "You help me win this case
and I got this other one that I can guarantee 15 or 20 hours
billable....". Its money, honey. Capitalism! American, the best justice
money can buy!
I know this is
lengthy, but I hope you consider printing this and sending it out on the
elists. It can then be passed along to failies or lawyres, or whoever. Feel
free to edit this how you deem fit. I believe my opinion and experience can be
shared, and benefitted from. I cannot give legal or medical advice. I can only
state my opinions, my experiences, my accomplishments, etc. I can recommend
certain experts, cite studies and case laws and let you know who is who in the
medico-legal field. I have contact info for well over 2,000 doctors, lawyers
and researchers in the vaccine, SBS, TBI, Child Abuse and legal arenas. Please
consider me part of your task-force. Please post my prison addres also (see at
top of email).
purposes, let me say that at present, I have nine experts who voice my
innocence. My own appeals are still underway. I plan on using the next 12 - 18
months to solidify my case and await the review completion of 34 additional
researchers/experts. Yes, 34 and growing. The wheels turn slow. I cannot afford
a lawyer. Who the hell can? I advise those of you who are stting in jail cells,
trusting your public pretenders, to get your butts in the law library. Learn
how to work the reports and journals. Start with these cases: Sheppardize the
US v: Gaskell case with your local law reporters; learn how to use the digests
and annotated tomes. Become a law clerk.
US v. Gaskell 985F.2d 1056 (11th cir. 1993)
Dixon vs State 691 So. 2d 515
Smith v. State 700 So.2d 446
New Jersey v. P.Z. 703A.2d 901
Lastly, let me
say that each case is different. A good lawyer who is experienced and
aggressive as well as well versed in the medical sciences is optimal. There are
those who believe the term "good-lawyer" is oxymoronic. I agree, for
the most part, yet there are such people. For a long time I associated these
people with unicorns, gryphons and other fabled creatures of lore. You must
search for them as if they were the holy grail. If you can afford, one, you may
come out of it okay. If not, God hlep you. Be very afraid...and then channel
that fear into productivity. as a charged or convicted "baby-killer",
you will be harassed by guards and inmates. I've had feces, urine, spit and
even sour milk thrown on me and all my property. If you can, avoid all physical
confrontations and fights at all costs. It will be used against you to show
what a violent monster you are.
To any families
of those accused...if your family member is innocent, you must do everything to
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
DISCLAIMER: All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.
Copyright 2013 by Vaccination News, A Non-Profit Corporation. All Rights Reserved. This content may not be copied unless permission in writing from Sandy Gottstein has been obtained.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"