http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/322/7300/1489

 

BMJIntended for health professionals - Click here for prescribing information

Home

Help

Search/Archive

Feedback

Table of Contents


Send a response to this article

Download to Citation Manager

Search Medline for articles by:
Tookey, P.

Alert me when:
New articles cite this article

BMJ 2001;322:1489 ( 16 June )

Letters

Pregnancy is contraindication for rubella vaccination still

EDITOR---Some of the statements in Josefson's news report of the Canadian study on inadvertent rubella vaccination in pregnancy might mislead a British audience.1 Since 1990 the Department of Health for the United Kingdom has advised that conception should be avoided for one month, rather than three months, after rubella vaccination. Furthermore, termination of pregnancy is no longer recommended even if vaccination does occur shortly before conception or during pregnancy.2 This was in the light of data collected in the United States, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, in which the outcome of pregnancies affected by inadvertent rubella vaccination was monitored.3

In England and Wales fewer than 40 terminations associated with rubella vaccination have been reported over the past 10 years, compared with over 400 in the previous 10 years.4 Over 100 live born infants have been reported to the rubella vaccination in pregnancy study, which is part of the national congenital rubella surveillance programme; 60% of their mothers were known to be susceptible to rubella at vaccination. No infant has been reported with congenital rubella syndrome. Nevertheless, among 25 tested infants whose susceptible mothers were vaccinated more than one week after conception, four had rubella immunoglobulin M at birth. Although it is reassuring that no child has been born with symptoms attributable to congenital rubella infection, it is quite another matter---and not appropriate---to suggest that rubella vaccine is safe in early pregnancy.

Pat Tookey, senior research fellow
National Congenital Rubella Surveillance Programme, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH p.tookey@ich.ucl.ac.uk



1.

Josefson D. Rubella vaccine may be safe in early pregnancy. BMJ 2000; 322: 695[Full Text]. (24 March.)

2.

Department of Health. Immunisation against infectious disease. London: Stationery Office, 1996.

3.

Tookey PA, Jones G, Miller BHR, Peckham CS. Rubella vaccination in pregnancy. Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly 1991; 1: R86-R88.

4.

Office for National Statistics. Abortion statistics. London: Stationery Office, 2000.


© BMJ 2001

Send a response to this article

Download to Citation Manager

Search Medline for articles by:
Tookey, P.

Alert me when:
New articles cite this article



Home

Help

Search/Archive

Feedback

Table of Contents

BMJEmergency Medicine Journal online

 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.