Brain study casts doubt on shaken baby death cases
By Robert Uhlig, Technology Correspondent
Thursday 14 June 2001
Daily telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=005257105824847&rtmo=3HYwHx8M&atmo=rrrrrrrq&pg=/et/01/6/14/nshak14.html
EVEN very gentle shaking could kill a baby, according to
the largest and most detailed study yet of the brains of infants who died in
suspicious circumstances.
The British study found that “rough handling” could be
sufficient to damage nerve fibres in the neck area that controlled breathing,
leading to brain swelling characteristic of violent shaking.
The research, published in New Scientist, challenges the
widely held view that only extreme violence causes shaken baby syndrome and
calls into question the scientific evidence behind many convictions for killing
infants. It could open the way for a wave of appeals. John Binns, a criminal defence solicitor with Victor Lissack
& Roscoe of London, said in future it might be impossible for a prosecution
to succeed unless the evidence was indisputable. Mr Binns said: “Unless it is
certain that injuries were caused by gross negligence or worse, the judge will direct
the jury to acquit.”
The case against Louise Woodward, the British nanny
convicted of murder for shaking a baby to death in America, would probably have
been seriously weakened by the findings. Miss Woodward’s conviction - reduced
to involuntary manslaughter on appeal - relied on the prosecutor demonstrating and
proving that Miss Woodward had shaken eight-month-old Matthew Eappen with all
her might for up to a minute.
The study was led by Jennian Geddes, a neuropathologist at
the Royal London Hospital. Her team examined the brains of 53 children, 37 of
whom were less than a year old, suspected of dying from deliberate head
injuries. The brains had been removed under coroner’s orders. The researchers
found that very few had suffered diffuse axonal injury, a type of traumatic
widespread brain damage seen in victims of high-speed road accidents or falls
from great heights.
It had been believed that diffuse axonal injury could
occur only if severe force was applied. The findings indicated that this
assumption was wrong. Dr Geddes found that 37 had died because they stopped
breathing, probably because mild shaking could damage nerve fibres in the neck
area that controlled breathing.
The lack of oxygen would make the brain swell
dramatically, showing the kind of damage previously blamed on violent shaking.
Very young babies were particularly vulnerable because their neck muscles were
weak and their heads relatively large and heavy.
Dr Geddes said normal interactions between mother and
child would not be sufficient to cause such injuries. “But you could imagine
scenarios that might produce the damage without it being deliberate,” she said.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.