http://www.medicalcomputingtoday.com/0nvabm.html
Acute Bacterial Meningitis
by Marjorie Lazoff, MD
Emergency Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Medical Editor
Medical Computing Today
accepted for publication in Medical
Computing Today October 1997
September
1998
Originally published in edited form October 1997 in Medical Software Reviews.
Sections
Education - Journals - Resources - Organizations - Research - Patient Ed - Lists of Lists - In Summary
The Internet is
publicized as a timely, scholarly, and practical resource for clinicians
practicing state-of-the-art medical care. How well does the Web fulfill this
promise? To help answer the question, the Web was examined for information on
two specific diseases, each affecting a wide range of physicians and patients.
This article looks at an acute and serious infectious disease; the next will
focus on a chronic debilitating neurologic disease.
Few conditions are as
respectfully feared as acute bacterial meningitis, and by so many different
types of physicians: general internists, family practitioners, pediatricians,
neurologists, infectious disease specialists, emergency physicians,
neonatologists, occupational specialists caring for large groups of young
people, and neurosurgeons caring for their post-op patients. We know the Hib
vaccine has dramatically decreased the incidence of H. flu meningitis. We know
the emergence of drug-resistant strains of pneumococcal meningitis has changed
treatment protocols in the United States. We know meningococcus draws media
attention as the source of potential deadly epidemics of meningitis that
typically strike young adults. We know that when and for how long, if ever, to
pre-treat with dexamethasone is controversial. We know delaying minutes in
instituting treatment can often mean the difference between life and neurologic
disability or death, and we know in actual practice how hard it is to diagnose
and treat within that time restraint.
Education
Several Web sites accommodate students and physicians looking for basic
instruction or review. Outlines,
unfortunately dated (in that they ignore changes in H. flue epidemiology and only
briefly discuss treatment controversies regarding resistant strains and
dexamethasone), are available from Michigan State University's Meningitis, and Pedbase's Bacterial
Meningitis. More satisfying for medical students, especially with their
links to related topics, is Kansas University Medical Center's Meningitis.
The Virtual Hospital's Infections of the Central Nervous System concentrates on
pathophysiology; look under Meningitis for text and embedded thumbnail graphics on
pyogenic meningitis, and general comments and comparisons to other forms of
meningitis. University of Utah WebPath's CNS Pathology posts this and the next six more slides of
gross pathology and CSF stains, all of excellent quality.
Several sites educate using clinical pathology case presentations and discussions.
For example, University of Pittsburgh's clinical microbiology section presents Fever,
purpura, and hypotension. See
the first two cases on Cornell's CNS Pathophysiology Cases.
Journals
There are surprisingly few online journal articles on meningitis. The October 2
issue of NEJM includes (alas, only the abstract of) Active Surveillance Team's Bacterial
Meningitis in the United States in 1995. In reference to another NEJM
article, a Letter and its response discuss various
recommendations for treatment of suspected pneumococcal meningitis.
The AMA presents the full text of the recent Archives of Internal Medicine
article reviewing Iceland's 20-year experience with Bacterial Meningitis in Adults. A nice summary
of this article appears on the American Family Physician site.
Searching
"meningitis" resulted in several abstracts from the basic
research-oriented Brain.
Online Resources
Searches performed on the growing number of commercial medical sites brought up
a great variety of minor tidbits and references, but also several major
articles of varying quality.
After selecting Journal Room on Medscape's home page, scroll all the way down
to access Infections in Medicine, then scroll down to the December 1995 issue,
under which is listed Gregory C. Townsend, MD, and W. Michael Scheld, MD's Adjunctive Corticosteroids for
Adult Bacterial Meningitis. It's worth the effort to obtain this readable,
scholarly review. On
PDR.net, registered users can directly link to David Anderson's CNS Infections - 30 minutes to Act, a largely forgettable
article from the May 30, 1996, issue of Patient Care, although the section on
treatment is quite readable.
Online quick references are the latest medical Web craze, and some sites are
more successful than others. Once registered (for free), Avicenna's search engine
supplies an Outline in Clinical Medicine on Meningitis, which emphasizes
bacterial meningitis in treatment and Meningococcemia.
Search "bacterial meningitis" under the Doctors Guide to the
Internet News to bring up a few news/press release items, such as a recent
convention reporting on a multi-center trial demonstrating the efficacy and
safety of meropenem in children, and a process report on a meningococcal
vaccine.
Organizations
Several organizations have created resources. UK's National Meningitis
Trust is a registered charity dedicated to warning physicians and
nonprofessionals about meningitis. Patient Fact Sheets and Specialist Views
form the nucleus of information, as described under Patient Education. An
online newsletter includes international news items and progress on research.
The photos and narratives from people whose lives have been unalterably
affected by meningitis are touching.
The well-meaning Meningitis
Foundation of America is the colonies' version of the UK Trust. Its organization
and much of the source material come from the Trust, to which users are best
referred. Physicians looking to frighten themselves will enjoy Could it be meningitis?.
Prepared for Britain's Medical Protection Society, it describes several missed
diagnoses.
The National Institutes of Health is a popular medical and health information
site, but in this instance other government agencies have better online
offerings. The Centers for
Disease Control (CDC) provides patient education resources on epidemiology
and travel, described below. WHO's Emerging and other Communicable Diseases
Surveillance and Control gathers its site articles together on a Meningitis
page. Health officials are described working
to control meningitis in Africa in a short article from Focus, a government
newsletter on new and emerging infections.
Research
The NIH and WHO are performing research into the immunology and epidemiology of
meningitis, and many educational institutions are involved in clinical trials.
However, the only detailed online descriptions of research activities I found
come from Great Britain. UK's Meningitis Research Foundation has somewhat confusing
information and slow loading photographs, but it provides a 24 hour hotline
number and lists research projects and funding. To search for genetic
vulnerabilities, it solicits volunteers among UK families with close family
members who had meningitis or septicemia.
Patient Education
Patients seeking education about meningitis will fare less well than
professionals. The CDC's Bacterial Meningitis offers a succinct fact sheet
addressing common concerns such as symptoms, diagnosis, contagion, and routine
and travel immunizations, along with several MMWR links. Less satisfying but
often-quoted (usually without acknowledgment) is a New York State Department of
Health fact sheet on meningitis. The information is dated despite
its April 1996 notation. The UK Meningitis Merseyside Support's Meningococcal
Septicaemia and Meningitis is filled with typos but does something rare
among fact sheets and databases: it lists the author. A person identified only
by his or her e- mail address has posted About
Meningitis, a site recommended less for content than for its heartfelt
labor-of-love presentation.
KidsHealth's
description of meningitis and lumbar puncture is accurate and cleanly presented, but it
did not convey enough important information about either the disease or the
procedure.
Lists of Lists
I did not encounter any lists on acute bacterial meningitis. Of the two Web
search engines that use MESH terms, Sweden's Karolinska
Institute Library search was more helpful than Oregon Health Science
University's CliniWeb.
Organizing Medical Networked
Information (OMNI) offers a variety of search methods, including its own
annotated listing. Check out the experimental OMNI Havester, a new MESH term
search engine that provided several very good resources not listed elsewhere.
Silverplatter's WebMedLit
searches 23 major medical online journals but, like Health Clinics USA, readers
will need to search "meningitis" manually as its search engine does
not permit linking to search results. Finally, a NetView on Patient
Education lists many of the major Web sites in this category, most of which
include information on meningitis.
In Summary
Reviewing the online resources on acute bacterial meningitis confirms that, for
physicians, the Web is competitive with mainstream print references on this
topic. High end primary sources are lacking, it is true, nor are all Web
references well maintained and updated. But this is balanced by the presence of
several top research and journal articles even before their publication date,
and by the daily snippets of news items, press releases, and abstracts.
In contrast, information for patients and nonmedical persons is discouragingly
inadequate. No site visited was both accurate and technically proficient, and
no discussion group was both active and moderated. Incredibly, a number of
sites lifted whole paragraphs and pages of information without crediting the
original Web source. Well-meaning or not, physician-authored or not, too many
Web sites that ostensibly offer health education are in fact confusing,
outdated or inaccurate.
Yet,
while far from ideal, the looming problem on the Web for physicians and their
patients is not content, but access to content. I found searching the Web for
any information on meningitis abysmally inefficient. Worse, for all the time
wasted, I have no way of knowing if I missed superior resources.
Other problems in accessing Web content emerged. Some (free) registered
commercial medical sites permit outsiders to link to specific articles,
interrupting the process only for the user to quickly register or log in before
linking to the reference. But most sites are not so accommodating, and they
bring the now logged-in user to the site's home page, losing forever the link
that brought the user there in the first place. I suppose this serves the
site's purposes in capturing new hits, but serious users are going to sorely
resent their search efforts being undermined. The future of these sites may be
limited less by subscription fees and in-your-face advertising then their
inability (or unwillingness) to contribute and link with the rest of the Web.
Search engines that use .cgi scripts or other technology can not be bookmarked.
I found this limiting in two respects. First, it prevents saving
frequently-used searches, a godsend when the search is complex and unique to
that site. Second, it prevents saving any reference identified using the search
engine. For this review I tried to backtrack and re-identify these references
by their file namea time consuming and often unsuccessful endeavor, so
characteristic of accessing the Web nowadays for a specific clinical or
educational purpose.
Comments
or questions for posting?
of
other articles
Introduction
and List
of other NetView articles
©
Copyright 1997-99 Healthcare
Computing Publications, Inc.
E-mail Medical Computing Today's editor or webmaster.
Copyright: This article is copyright © Medical Computing Today
and the individual author(s). Permission is granted for nonprofit purposes to
download, print, and distribute material from Medical Computing Today
for educational purposes, provided that the material is not altered and that
this copyright notice is included. No individual or corporation shall charge
for this content, or include any of it in a larger document for which charges
are levied, without the prior permission of Medical Computing Today, who
may be reached by contacting: Editor, Medical Computing Today, 462
Second Street; Brooklyn, New York 11215; telephone: 718-499-5910; fax:
718-768-3260; e-mail:editor@medicalcomputingtoday.com.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.