The HRT (Hormone Replacement Therapy)
scandal is bigger than most think. It's not just about menopausal women,
like me, getting bad information from their physicians and the
pharmaceutical industry for over 40 years, while the federal government
stood by and did nothing. The scandal is much bigger than that.
We're living in a world awash in hormones. Last March the USGS
(United States Geological Survey) reported that " pharmaceuticals,
hormones, and other organic wastewater-related chemicals have been
detected at very low concentrations in streams across the nation. Many
of the chemicals examined (81 of 95) do not have drinking-water
standards or health advisories." Ironically, hormones do more damage at
low levels of exposure, than at high levels.
More disturbing news came from Great Britain. According to British
scientists, synthetic hormones from contraceptives and HRT are affecting
the reproductive organs of male fish. Male fish are developing female
characteristics, including reproductive organs. The five-year study of
ten rivers in England by the Environment Agency reported that 50% of
male fish had developed eggs in their testes or female reproductive
ducts, 10% of the fish were sterile, and 25% were producing damaged
sperm.
For the last 50 years researchers around the world have documented
the growing and insidious impact of hormones on people and the
environment. Excessive exposure to hormones, both synthetic and natural,
are affecting every living thing - humans, animals, fish, and even
plants. Physicians are prescribing hormones to millions of men, women,
and children. Farmers are giving hormones to their livestock, including
farmed fish. Hormones are in our food and many of the products we use
everyday. Synthetic hormones, which interfere with our natural hormones,
can leach out of an endless variety of products: plastics, beauty and
personal care products, household cleaners, lawn and garden chemicals,
dental sealants ... almost anything involving petrochemicals.
Yet, few hormones have ever been thoroughly or independently tested
for their impact on public health and the environment. And the
cumulative impact of many different hormones - male and female, natural
and synthetic - is not even being considered for study by industry or
government.
Cynthia Pearson, Executive Director of the National Women's Health
Network, isn't surprised. She says, “Pharmaceutical companies control
what studies get funded, who gets paid for doing them, where (and
whether or not) those studies are published, and how the studies are
interpreted.”
The HRT study got launched mainly through the determined efforts of
Dr. Bernadine Healy, the National Institute of Health's first female
director. But, insiders say that, due to the hard ball lobbying tactics
of the pharmaceutical industry, the study was limited to only two
hormones, estrogen and progestin. Already, the industry is pushing
alternative drug therapies that most assuredly have not gone through the
somewhat rigorous testing of the HRT study.
And contrary to media reports that blame women for the widespread use
of HRT... that accuse women of flocking to their doctors, clamoring to
remain young forever, demanding hormones …that was neither my experience
nor the experience of women I've talked with. Instead, it seems that
most doctors made their female patients feel like tree-hugging nut cases
if they didn't go on HRT.
Now I, like many other menopausal mavens, am learning to minimize my
symptoms through simple changes in my diet – no thanks to our doctors.
The mainstream medical community is totally unprepared to do anything in
concert with nature. They are held hostage by the pharmaceutical
industry. Under their current myopic approach to treatment, the medical
profession systemically violates its own ethic, first "do no harm." It
is now clear that "harm" is just what they've been doing through the
widespread use of poorly tested hormones.
And what is the extent of the “harm” done? Dr. Theo Colborn and her
co-authors of "Our Stolen Future" say that the known risks of
over-exposure to synthetic hormones are: lower sperm count, prostate
problems, reproductive problems in women (including miscarriages, tubal
pregnancies, endometriosis, and breast cancer), and effects on
intelligence, behavior, development, and disease resistance. Some health
experts believe that human exposure to the Bovine Growth Hormone (BFH)
present in meat and dairy products could be at the heart of the current
epidemic in obesity.
As for which institution is most responsible for a world awash in
hormones, I blame the federal government for failure to do its duty - to
protect public health and the environment. Instead, they routinely give
the green light to, if not pave the way for, those in business who want
to make the big bucks, no matter who or what gets hurt. The HRT study
was an exception to the rule. Now that menopausal women know that we
were lied to for at least 40 years, all I can say is...hell hath no fury
...
Lynn Landes (
lynnlandes@earthlink.net ) is a freelance journalist specializing in
environmental issues. She is a weekly commentator on the BBC's Radio
Five Live and reports environmental news for DUTV in Philadelphia, PA (EcoTalk.org).
Lynn also hosts a website devoted to research on waste and toxics issues
(ZeroWasteAmerica.org).
Links
National Institute of Health's HRT website
http://www.nih.gov/HRTindex.htm
Website for "Our Stolen Future"
http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/
Diet for Menopause
http://www.holistic-online.com/Remedies/hrt/hrt_food_diet.htm
###