|
July 8,
2002
WILL THREE
UNLICENSED SMALLPOX VACCINES BE USED TO IMMUNIZE 500,000 AMERICANS?
By
Meryl Nass, MD
An
estimated 500,000 first responders, lab and hospital workers will
receive smallpox vaccine, the Department of Health and Human Services
(DHHS) announced yesterday.
This is
an interesting announcement, because to my knowledge there exist no
FDA-licensed smallpox vaccines.
There
are three vaccine candidates whose safety and efficacy are uncertain
at this time.
The
first vaccine made available was named Dryvax, which was pulled out of
storage after approximately thirty years. Initial reports indicated
that a 1:5 dilution yielded 70% efficacy. However, recent reports
indicated that this diluted old vaccine was nearly 100% effective.
Which
is it?
Furthermore, a 1999 report in Science noted that the rubber seals on
the vials were deteriorating, and that 1/4 of the vials "were
suspect." Are the suspect vials being diluted to make new vaccine
also?
The
second vaccine comes from the Aventis stockpile, allegedly "lost" for
decades. Millions of doses of vaccine do not get lost. Vaccine lots
are required to have a documented testing history, and both the
manufacturer and FDA should have records on file of the dates the lots
were released and their specifications at the time.
For
both these ancient vaccine stockpiles, there exists no approved
method by which FDA can legally "relicense" them for current use
based on test results generated today. There is no way long-expired
product can be "regenerated" for licensure within current FDA
regulations.
The
third vaccine candidate is the Acambis (previously Oravax, using
Baxter as subcontractor) smallpox vaccine. This is a new vaccine whose
makeup, as well as its safety and efficacy profile, have not been
publicly discussed. The FDA finalized a rule May 30, 2002 for
accepting animal tests in lieu of human tests for efficacy of
bioterrorism drugs and vaccines. This opens the door for the new
vaccine to receive a full FDA license.
An
article in this month's Emerging Infectious Diseases (CDC) by James
LeDuc and Peter Jahrling et al indicates that the Acambis vaccine is
in Phase I trials and licensure is not expected until sometime in
2003.
When
will the public and medical professionals learn all the details needed
to make an informed decision about using this new product? This
information is not releasable by FDA until after licensure. One hopes
that the vaccine will not be used until adequate safety testing has
taken place: Phase I trials do not provide thorough information on
drug and vaccine safety.
It thus
appears that three unlicensed vaccines may soon be available for use
in 500,000 Americans. Potentially severe consequences are anticipated
in those with eczema, HIV infection, other forms of immune deficiency,
and cancers (who are receiving radiation or chemotherapy). There may
be other, unknown risk factors that predispose to serious vaccine
complications.
The
anticipated extent of spread of the vaccinia virus to contacts of the
500,000 has not been publicly discussed, nor have measures to minimize
such spread, although taking such steps is a very important part of
protecting the health of contacts. Recall that most of the 500,000 are
involved in direct patient care: their contacts are the very people
most at risk of vaccinia's spread.
Are the
500,000 expected to acquiesce to receiving an experimental vaccine(s)?
Will they be asked to sign an informed consent, and will the consent
ask them to give up any rights to compensation for injuries sustained
as a result of vaccination? Will they be placed into clinical trials
comparing the three vaccine candidates? Who will pay for deaths and
injuries to these vaccine recipients that occur as a result of
vaccination? Who will pay for deaths and injuries in their contacts?
Does it
make good sense to perform this experiment with all our nation's first
responders and a sizable chunk of our lab techs and physicians? Or
does it make more sense to start vaccinations slowly and observe
closely for problems, so they can be mitigated prior to vaccinating
large numbers of critical personnel?
I am a
primary care physician with a hospital practice, and I may be one of
the designated half million. I daresay that if offered the vaccine, I
will not be a "taker". How many of the 500,000 intend to comply with
this DHHS directive? |