John Vidal, environment
editor
Wednesday July 17, 2002
The Guardian
Britain should adopt a policy of vaccination as "a tool of first resort" to
contain and eradicate foot and mouth disease, said scientists asked by the
government to recommend how to handle future outbreaks.
Dismissing the government timidity and farm leaders' intransigence that
stopped plans for limited vaccination in last year's £7bn epidemic, the
Royal Society report on infectious diseases in livestock argued strongly
that centuries old official reliance on mass culling was now scientifically
and socially wanting.
"Five times in 80 years we have not been able to contain this disease. We
have to turn to vaccination. There is no other way we can remove the disease
in 2002", said Sir Brian Follett, chairman of the £400,000 inquiry which
took evidence from 400 organisations and individuals.
The inquiry team of 15, including academics, farmers, and vets, stopped
short of recommending that all sheep, cattle and pigs be vaccinated against
the disease, but said that if international outbreaks continued to occur
then such a strategy should be considered.
Instead, the report called for emergency vaccination from the start of
any future outbreak. "[It] offers an alternative control strategy which can
avoid extensive culling, is likely to less disruptive to the farming and
tourist economies, runs less risk of spread of the virus by the culling
operation and can be a more humane approach to disease control", said the
report.
But the inquiry did not rule out slaughter. "The rapid culling of
infected premises and known dangerous contacts, combined with movement
control and rapid diagnosis will remain essential to controlling foot and
mouth diseases and most other highly infectious diseases. In many cases,
however, this will not be sufficient to guarantee that the outbreak does not
develop into an epidemic", it said.
Sir Brian Follett said that the draconian "contiguous culling" policy had
proved to be a "blunt instrument" and that better mathematical modelling was
needed to accurately assess the potential movement of the disease.
Scorn was also poured on the government's, local authorities' and
farmers' insistence last year that vast areas of the countryside should be
closed in case walkers or traffic spread the disease. The report also found
no scientific evidence to suggest that wildlife could act as a reservoir of
infection.
There were widespread calls last year by farmers and others to cull wild
boar, deer and birds, all of which were thought to be potentially able
spread the disease. The inquiry said that there is still little scientific
understanding about how 80% of the disease was spread from farm to farm.
The report was yesterday interpreted as a putdown for Ben Gill, the
National Farmers' Union leader who insisted throughout the epidemic that
vaccination was inadvisable, and the Food and Drink Federation which lobbied
strongly against vaccination in case it upset food manufacturers' export
markets.
· The European commission is expected to demand massive fines
against France tomorrow for continuing its illegal ban on British beef
exports.
The daily fines will need clearance from the European court of justice
and under normal procedures it could be months before the penalties bite.
But the food safety commissioner, David Byrne, is pressing the Luxembourg
judges to impose the punishment as soon as possible following French refusal
to comply with an original court ruling to lift the ban.