OMPUTER
networks have been used for years by public health officials to monitor
outbreaks of disease. Typically, the networks compile a database of reports
about sick patients from doctors or other health care workers and look for
patterns of illness or symptoms. But the reporting and compiling can take a day
or more, delaying detection of an outbreak.
Advertisement
Even before the anthrax attacks in the United States last fall, public health
experts had recognized a need for more rapid surveillance and detection, given
that an outbreak may involve deliberate and widespread attempts to infect rather
than the natural spread of contagion. Several universities and hospitals are
developing systems to collect and analyze disease data immediately as soon as
a patient is admitted to a hospital emergency room, for example.
One such program, called Real-Time Outbreak and Disease Surveillance, or
RODS, is being developed at the Center for Biomedical Informatics at the
University of Pittsburgh. Since October, the program, financed primarily by the
National Library of Medicine, has been receiving data about patients through a
private computer network from 15 hospital emergency departments in Western
Pennsylvania as soon as the patients are admitted.
The information includes the chief complaint a patient gives to emergency
room administrators, like respiratory problems, rashes or diarrhea. The system
also notes the patient's age, time and date of visit, gender, and ZIP code. This
information is kept separate from the patient's name, address and Social
Security number to protect privacy.
The system compares new reports with those in its database, looking for
similarities. In addition, the RODS project uses geographic information systems
software that maps the data to reveal any geographical patterns behind the
surveillance information.
"Our goal is to be able to analyze patterns and ask whether there is
something unusual compared to the usual," said Dr. Michael Wagner, assistant
professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh and director of the RODS
Laboratory and the Biomedical Security Institute in Pittsburgh.
Because it focuses on symptoms of patients seeking emergency care, delays in
the detection of outbreaks could be cut significantly.
"A lot of places receive data in batch mode at midnight," Dr. Wagner said.
"This can mean delays in detection of up to 24 hours."
The idea, he said, is that "if 10 people show up with diarrhea in the middle
of the night, it's going to be detected at 3 a.m. rather than at midnight the
next night." If those people are the first of many victims of a bioterrorism
incident, one that will require large amounts of resources like medicine to
fight, "those hours are going to make a difference," Dr. Wagner said.
During the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City in February, RODS linked to
about 30 area hospitals and walk-in clinics. Although there were no incidents of
bioterrorism during the games, the system did detect an influenza outbreak based
on the number of patients who showed up with respiratory complaints.
Ideally, as the RODS system evolves, it would find ways to link to other
sources of data.
"There's a torrent of information being collected routinely in real time,"
Dr. Wagner said. "Over-the-counter sales of pharmaceuticals contain information
that's very relevant to outbreaks of disease. Our goals include building a thin
layer of data collection infrastructure on top of the existing data collection
systems of health care and other industries."
Another real-time disease surveillance program, the Children's Hospital
Project in Boston, monitors its own complaint data and data from another Boston
hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Several other area hospitals
have agreed to collaborate over the next year. Doctors involved in the project
are particularly interested in exploring whether changes in patient behavior can
be interpreted as early indicators of disease outbreaks.
"When people get sick, their behavior changes, and some of these changes will
influence their use of the health care system," said Dr. Kenneth Mandl,
attending physician in pediatric emergency medicine at Children's Hospital in
Boston. He is also a principal investigator of the Children's Hospital Project,
which is financed by the federal Department of Health and Human Services.
He said that the group was looking for "signature patterns" in sets of data
from emergency departments to detect small and large surges in certain kinds of
visits.
If anthrax was released into a ventilation system in a school, for example,
Dr. Mandl and his staff would look for increases in numbers of children showing
up at hospitals with flulike symptoms over the course of each day, in addition
to clusters of children coming in who lived near one another.
The trick is having a foundation of data about normal behavior patterns for
comparison, Dr. Mandl said. The Boston project is using a database with
information on hundreds of thousands of patients who have been seen in the
emergency department at Children's Hospital over the last eight years.
Whether the goal is to get immediate access to information or not, disease
surveillance systems face many hurdles, most notably the cooperation of doctors
and hospitals in making patient information available in standardized form.
Virtually everyone in the field agrees on the importance of developing systems
that do not require any extra work from hospital personnel.
"Doctors aren't very compliant about reporting, so the surveillance systems
that rely on that kind of effort tend not to work very well," Dr. Mandl said.
Others question whether patients' complaints are the most accurate way of
gauging potential threats, or whether a doctors' diagnoses or requests for
laboratory tests are a better indicator.
"We think the clinician is going to give us a better picture of a potential
syndrome rather than a patient's self-report," said Dr. Jeffrey Duchin, who
oversees a system in the Seattle area that monitors patient discharge diagnoses
in 12 emergency rooms.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"