new study finds large differences in how four different vaccination strategies
would fight a smallpox terror attack, with the best allowing 440 deaths and the
worst 110,000 deaths.
The study used a mathematical model to compare how a smallpox attack on a
large city that infected 1,000 people would progress when countered with diverse
vaccination plans meant to halt the spread of the highly contagious disease.
In all cases, mass vaccination of the United States population worked far
better than limited, local immunizations, a strategy the federal government has
tended to prefer.
"We find that mass vaccination results in both far fewer deaths and much
faster epidemic eradication," the authors concluded.
In the best case, the hypothetical epidemic was halted in 115 days and in the
worst, 350 days.
The analysis, published this week in the online edition of Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, was written by Edward H. Kaplan, a public health
specialist at Yale University, and David L. Craft and Lawrence M. Wein, both of
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ever since smallpox was eradicated from human populations decades ago,
federal officials have resisted mass vaccination because the vaccine uses a live
virus that can cause severe side effects and even kill. In the days of
widespread vaccination, roughly one person in a million receiving the vaccine
died.
But federal policy is in flux because of fears of bioterrorism. Although
today only Russia and the United States are known to have stocks of the virus,
experts say clandestine supplies probably exist.
Most people are considered vulnerable to a smallpox attack because immunity
is thought to wane over time. The United States stopped routine vaccinations in
1972. Smallpox kills roughly one in three victims who are unvaccinated.
Vaccination can save even infected people: if given within four days of
exposure to the virus, the vaccine halts the disease's advance.
The new study, coming amid rising criticism of federal policy in recent
months, claims to be the first to make detailed comparisons of the vaccination
options. It expands on a presentation Dr. Kaplan gave last month in Washington.
The study found the least effective method to be "ring vaccination," the
primary way smallpox was eradicated from human populations. It consists of
isolating infected patients and vaccinating people found to be in close contact
with them, forming a ring of immunization around any outbreak and a barrier to
its spread.
In the hypothetical attack, ring vaccination allowed 367,000 cases of
smallpox and 110,000 deaths and took 350 days to extinguish the outbreak.
By contrast, mass vaccinations as soon as authorities became aware of a
attack it takes roughly two weeks for smallpox to incubate and a body to show
symptoms would result in 1,830 cases and 560 deaths within 115 days.
The study found that if the authorities decided belatedly to switch from
ring-to-mass vaccination on the 33rd day of the crisis, the effect would still
be considerable, 15,570 cases and 4,680 deaths. "The cost of waiting," the
authors said, "is very high 4,120 incremental deaths."
The study found that the vaccination of the United States population before
an attack worked best of all to cut fatalities.
If only 40 percent of the population were immunized before any such attack,
the same attack followed by wider mass vaccinations would produce 440 deaths.
But if followed with ring vaccinations, the result would be 40,000 deaths.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"