|

|
Canada Communicable Disease Report Vol. 26 (ACS-1)
1 May 2000
An Advisory Committee
Statement (ACS)
National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)*
STATEMENT ON ADULT/ADOLESCENT
FORMULATION
OF COMBINED ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS, TETANUS,
AND DIPHTHERIA VACCINE
Adobe Downloadable Document
(175 KB)
|
PREAMBLE
The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)
provides Health Canada with ongoing and timely medical, scientific, and
public-health advice relating to immunization. Health Canada acknowledges
that the advice and recommendations set out in this statement are based upon
the best current available scientific knowledge, and is disseminating this
document for information purposes. Persons administering or using the
vaccine(s) should also be aware of the contents of the relevant product
monograph(s). Recommendations for use and other information set out herein
may differ from that set out in the product monograph(s) of the Canadian
licensed manufacturer(s) of the vaccine(s). Manufacturer(s) have only sought
approval of the vaccine(s) and provided evidence as to its safety and
efficacy when used in accordance with the product monographs.
INTRODUCTION
A combined acellular pertussis, tetanus and diphtheria
vaccine for use in adolescents and adults is licensed in Canada. In this
statement, NACI is making preliminary recommendations on its use based on
limited data. The goal for pertussis immunization in Canada is to reduce the
morbidity and mortality related to pertussis infection. There has been no
study on the efficacy of this vaccine in preventing disease or on the safety
of repeated booster doses and it is unlikely that such data will be
available on the short-term. There are no data on the effect of booster
doses on the epidemiology of pertussis. As new data accumulate through
postmarketing studies, NACI will review and possibly modify these
recommendations.
The combined acellular pertussis, tetanus and diphtheria
vaccine (ADACELTM) manufactured by Aventis Pasteur Limited was
licensed for use in persons aged 12 to 54 years. This product has been
licensed only to be given as booster dose. It is the first vaccine
formulation containing a pertussis component approved in Canada for
immunization of adolescents and adults.
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PERTUSSIS
IN ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS IN CANADA
Whole cell pertussis vaccine was used in Canada for >
50 years. It has long been recognized that protection provided by the whole
cell pertussis vaccine waned with time(1,2). Nevertheless, the
use of this vaccine was restricted to children < 7 years of age because the
severity of local reactions increased with age. Because of waning immunity,
many vaccinated children became susceptible to pertussis in adolescence or
adulthood(3,4). Pertussis is a frequent cause of cough illness in
adolescents and adults (5-16) who constitute a major reservoir of
the disease and are an important source of transmission to infants(17,18).
The incidence of pertussis in Canada was low during the
eighties but has increased since 1990 in spite of high vaccine coverage(19,20).
The resurgence of pertussis was partly attributable to a low vaccine
efficacy which has been estimated to be in the range of 50% to 60%
in children(19-21). While children < 10 years of age are by far
the most affected group, both the number and proportion of older cases have
increased over the last decade. This increase may be attributable in part to
a better recognition and reporting of pertussis in adolescents and adults.
The higher incidence in adolescents and adults parallels the increase
observed in children. During the last decade the average annual incidence
rate was 24.3 per 100,000 for those 10 to 19 years of age and was 2.7 per
100,000 for those >= 20 years of age.
While there has been no large scale assessment of the
proportion of susceptible adolescents and adults, three Canadian studies
estimated the secondary attack rate (SAR) in household contacts of pertussis
cases(22-24) A re-analysis of these data looking at the SAR only
in households where the reported case was also the first case shows the SAR
ranged between 12% and 14% in contacts aged 12 to17 years, between 11% and
18% in adults aged 18 to 29 years, and between 8% and 33% in those >= 30
years.
The Sentinel Health Unit Surveillance System also
documented pertussis infection in Canadian adolescents and adults with
non-improving cough illness lasting >= 7 days. Using a combination of
laboratory methods, 9% to 20% of these patients were found to be infected
depending on the case definition.
It can be concluded that 10% to 25% of adolescents and
adults in Canada are susceptible to pertussis and that these individuals
play a role in its transmission.
EFFICACY AND
IMMUNOGENICITY
The immunogenicity of the diphtheria and tetanus
components of ADACELTM is equivalent to that obtained with
tetanus toxiod and diptheria toxoid (Td) vaccines.
There are no data about the efficacy of a single dose of
ADACELTM given to previously immunized adolescents or adults in
the prevention of pertussis infection, disease, and transmission. However,
it has been shown that this dose increases their pertussis antibody levels
far in excess of those observed in Sweden in infants who received three
doses of acellular pertussis vaccine (Table 1). This is
true for all three antibodies (PT, pertactin, fimbriae) that were associated
with protection in previous studies(25,26). As the efficacy
demonstrated in the Swedish trial was 85% (95% confidence interval: 81% to
89%)(27), it is reasonable to expect that the protection against
severe disease in adolescents and adults would be of the same order, and
this may lead to reduced transmission. However, the magnitude of the
protection, its duration and its effect on transmission is still unknown.
Other indirect evidence supporting that a single dose of ADACELTM
will be protective comes from recent data showing the efficacy of a single
booster dose of acellular pertussis vaccine in infants or preschool aged
children (Dr. G. De Serres, unpublished data). In this study, the interval
since the previous dose was between 1 and 3.5 years, a much shorter period
than in adolescents or in adults.
Table 1
Pertussis antibody response after 1 dose of ADACELTM
compared with a 3rd dose of TRIPACELTM (DTaP) or a 4th dose
of PENTACELTM (DTaP-Hib-Polio) |
|
Pertussis antibody |
Geometric mean titre (EU/ml)
|
|
After 3rd dose with TRIPACELTM
in infants |
After 4th dose with PENTACELTM |
After 1 dose of ADACELTM
|
|
Sweden* |
Sweden**
|
18-month booster
|
Adolescents
|
Adults
|
| Pertussis
toxoid |
47.9 |
51.6 |
182 |
181 |
139 |
| Filamentous
hemagglutinin |
33.7 |
57.0 |
245 |
333 |
333 |
| Pertactin (69
kDa) |
110 |
134 |
210 |
362 |
259 |
| Fimbriae (Agg 2
+ 3) |
333 |
352 |
855 |
1,471 |
930 |
| Agglutinins
|
|
|
1,305 |
1,321 |
1,082 |
|
** From/Tiré de : Gustafsson L, Hallander HO, Olin P et al. A
controlled trial of a two-component acellular, a five-component
acellular, and a whole-cell pertussis vaccine. N Engl J Med
1996;334:349-55. |
PREPARATION USED FOR
IMMUNIZATION
ADACELTM is a sterile, cloudy, uniform
suspension of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids adsorbed on aluminum phosphate,
combined with component pertussis vaccine and suspended in water for
injection. Component pertussis vaccine is an acellular pertussis vaccine
composed of five pertussis antigens. Each dose (0.5 mL) contains
| Tetanus toxoid |
5 Lf |
| Diphtheria toxoid |
2 Lf |
| Pertussis toxoid (PT) |
2.5 µg |
| Filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) |
5 µg |
| Fimbriae (agglutinogens 2 + 3) |
5 µg |
| Pertactin (69 kDa membrane protein) |
3 µg |
| Aluminum phosphate (0.33 mg aluminium) |
1.5 µg |
| 2-phenoxyethanol as preservative |
0.6% ± 0.1% (v/v) |
The antigen content of this vaccine (including the
pertussis content) is lower than the one found in the vaccines used in
preschool children.
DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION
When used in people who have been previously immunized
against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis a dose of 0.5 mL should be
administered intramuscularly as a booster dose. The preferred site is the
deltoid muscle.
STORAGE AND HANDLING
REQUIREMENTS
ADACELTM should be stored between 2° C and
8° C. Do not freeze. Product which has been exposed to freezing should not
be used.
RECOMMENDED USAGE
ADACELTM has been licensed for the prevention
of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in previously immunized adolescents
and adults aged 12 to 54 years. It can be used to replace the adolescent
booster of Td for those individuals who wish to have protection. There are
no data available at the moment on which to base a recommendation for
universal routine use. It can also be used instead of Td in adults who have
to be protected against diphtheria and tetanus and also wish to decrease
their risk of pertussis. Until data about safety of repeated doses is
available, more than one dose cannot be recommended. This vaccine has not
been licensed for primary immunization and should not be used for this
indication except under clinical trial conditions.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
A history of hypersensitivity to any component of the
vaccine is a contraindication.
PRECAUTIONS
Inactivated vaccines and toxoids are usually considered
safe for the fetus, but the effect of administration of ADACELTM
on the development of the embryo and the fetus has not been assessed.
Immunization of a pregnant woman may be indicated when the risk of disease
outweighs the risk of vaccine both for the mother and the fetus. If this
condition is not met, vaccination should be deferred until after delivery.
Moderate to severe illness with or without fever is a
reason to defer immunization. This precaution avoids superimposing adverse
effects from the vaccine on the underlying illness or mistakenly attributing
to the vaccine an adverse manifestation which is a symptom or sign of the
underlying illness.
No data is available about the immune response of patients
who receive immonosuppressive therapies or who are otherwise
immunocompromised but it is possible that the vaccine may not elicit the
expected immune response in these people.
ADVERSE REACTIONS
In a clinical trial comparing adolescents and adults given
ADACELTM or Td, the adverse reaction rates observed with ADACELTM
were comparable to those seen with Td adsorbed (Table 2).
Local reaction was the most frequent event with pain occurring in 89%,
erythema in 12%, and swelling 17%. These local reaction were generally mild
and transient. By decreasing order of frequency the systemic adverse events
were headache (39%), decreased energy (29%), generalized bodyache (20%),
nausea (15%), chills (13%), diarrhea (10%), fever (9%), sore and swollen
joints (9%), and vomiting (2%). These systemic events were rarely severe (Table
2).
Table 2
Rate of adverse events reported after vaccination with ADACELTM
compared to Td adsorbed |
|
Adverse events
|
Severity
|
Adverse event rate %
|
|
ADACELTM
n = 449 |
Td adsorbed
n = 151 |
|
Local |
|
Pain |
Any
|
88.6 |
88.7 |
| Severe
|
0.4 |
0.7 |
|
Swelling |
Any
|
16.7 |
16.6 |
| Severe
|
10.3 |
8.7 |
|
Redness |
Any
|
11.8 |
6.6 |
| Severe
|
3.3 |
2.0 |
|
Systemic |
|
Headache |
Any
|
38.8 |
35.8 |
| Severe
|
1.8 |
0.7 |
|
Fever |
Any
|
9.4 |
6.0 |
| Severe
|
0
|
0
|
|
Decreased Energy |
Any
|
29.4 |
27.8 |
| Severe
|
2.2 |
2.0 |
|
Bodyache |
Any
|
20.0 |
13.9 |
| Severe
|
1.1 |
0
|
|
Chills |
Any
|
12.5* |
5.3 |
| Severe
|
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
Nausea |
Any
|
14.7 |
11.3 |
| Severe
|
0.9 |
0
|
|
Diarrhea |
Any
|
10.0 |
11.3 |
| Severe
|
0.2 |
0
|
|
Sore joints |
Any
|
9.1 |
8.6 |
| Severe
|
0.4 |
0
|
|
Vomiting |
Any
|
2.4 |
0.7 |
| Severe
|
0.9 |
0
|
| * p
< 0.05 |
RECOMMENDATION
Table 3 below presents evidence-based
medicine categories for the strength and quality of the evidence for the
recommendation that follows:
One booster dose in individuals previously immunized
against tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (C III).
Table 3
Strength and quality of evidence summary sheet* |
|
Categories for the strength
of each recommendation |
|
Category
|
Definition
|
|
A
|
Good evidence
to support a recommendation for use. |
|
B
|
Moderate
evidence to support a recommendation for use. |
|
C
|
Poor evidence
to support a recommendation for or against use. |
|
D
|
Moderate
evidence to support a recommendation against use. |
|
E
|
Good evidence
to support a recommendation against use. |
|
Categories for the quality of evidence on which recommendations are
made |
|
Grade
|
Definition
|
|
I
|
Evidence from
at least one properly randomized, controlled trial. |
|
II |
Evidence from
at least one well designed clinical trial without randomization, from
cohort or case-controlled analytic studies, preferably from more than
one centre, from multiple time series, or from dramatic results in
uncontrolled experiments. |
|
III |
Evidence from
opinions or respected authorities on the basis of clinical experience,
descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. |
| *
From: Macpherson DW. Evidence-based medicine. CCDR
1994;20:145-47. |
References
1. Lambert HP. Epidemiology of a small pertussis
outbreak. Public Health Reports 1965;80:365-69.
2. Jenkinson D. Duration of effectiveness of pertussis
vaccine: evidence from a 10 year community study. Brit Med J
1988;296:612-14.
3. Fine PEM, Clarkson JA. Distribution of immunity to
pertussis in the population of England and Wales. J Hyg Camb
1984;92:21-26.
4. Cattaneo LA, Reed GW, Haase DH et al. The
seroepidemiology of Bordetella pertussis infections: a study of
persons ages 1-65 years. J Infect Dis 1996;173:1256-59.
5. Robertson PW, Goldberg H, Jarvie BH et al.
Bordetella pertussis infection: a cause of persistent cough in
adults. Med J Australia 1987;146:522-25.
6. Aoyama T, Takeuchi Y, Goto A et al. Pertussis in
adults. Am J Dis Child 1992;146:163-66.
7. Cromer BA, Goydos J, Hackell J et al. Unrecognized
pertussis infection in adolescents. Am J Dis Child 1993;147:575-77.
8. Wirsing von Konig CH, Postels-Multani S, Bock HL et al.
Pertussis in adults: frequency of transmission after household exposure.
Lancet 1995;346:1326-29.
9. Wright SW, Edwards KM, Decker MD et al. Pertussis
infection in adults with persistent cough. JAMA 1995;273:1044-46.
10. Postels-Multani S, Schmitt HJ, Wirsing von König CH et
al. Symptoms and complications of pertussis in adults. Infection
1995;23:13-16.
11. Schmitt-Grohé S, Cherry JD, Heininger U et al.
Pertussis in German adults. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:860-66.
12. Aoyama T, Harashima M, Nishimura K et al. Outbreak
of pertussis in highly immunized adolescents and its secondary spread to
their families. Acta Paediatr Jap 1995;37:321-24.
13. Mink CM, Sirota NM, Nugent S. Outbreak of pertussis
in a fully immunized adolescent an adult population. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med 1994;148:153-57.
14. Rosenthal S, Strebel P, Cassiday P et al. Pertussis
infection among adults during the 1993 outbreak in Chicago. J Infect Dis
1995;171:1650-52.
15. Deville JG, Cherry JD, Chirstenson PD et al.
Frequency of unrecognized Bordetella pertussis infections in adults.
Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:639-42.
16. Nennig ME, Shinefield HR, Edwards KM et al. Prevalence
and incidence of adult pertussis in an urban population. JAMA
1996:275;1672-74.
17. Nelson JD. The changing epidemiology of pertussis
in young infants. Am J Dis Child 1978;132:371-73.
18. Mortimer EA. Pertussis and its prevention: a family
affair. J Infect Dis 1990:161:473-79.
19. De Serres G, Boulianne N, Duval B et al.
Effectiveness of a whole cell pertussis vaccine in child-care centers and
schools. Ped Infect Dis J 1996;15:519-24.
20. Bentsi-Enchill AD, Halperin SA, Scott J et al.
Estimates of the effectiveness of a whole-cell pertussis vaccine from an
outbreak in an immunized population. Vaccine 1997;15:301-06.
21. Halperin SA, Bortolussi R, MacLean D et al.
Persistence of pertussis in an immunized population: results of the Nova
Scotia enhanced pertussis surveillance program. J Pediatr
1989;115:686-93.
22. De Serres G, Boulianne N, Duval B. Field
effectiveness of erythromycin prophylaxis to prevent pertussis within
families. Ped Infect Dis J 1995;14:969-75.
23. Halperin SA, Bortolussi R, Langley JM et al. A
randomized, placebo-controlled trial of erythromycin estolate
chemoprophylaxis for household contacts of children with culture-positive
Bordetella pertussis infections. URL: <http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/104/4/e42>.
Date of access: Oct. 2000.
24. De Serres G, Shadmani, R, Duval B et al. Morbidity
of pertussis in adolescents and adults. J Infect Dis. In press.
25. Cherry JD, Gornbein J, Heininger U et al. A search
for serologic correlates of immunity to Bordetella pertussis cough
illnesses. Vaccine 1998;16:1901-06.
26. Storsaeter J, Hallander HO, Gustafsson L et al.
Levels of anti-pertussis antibodies related to protection after household
exposure to Bordetella pertussis. Vaccine 1998;16:1907-16.
27. Gustafsson L, Hallander HO, Olin P et al. A
controlled trial of a two-component acellular, a five-component acellular,
and a whole-cell pertussis vaccine. N Engl J Med 1996;334:349-55.
* Members:
Dr. V. Marchessault (Chairperson), Dr. J. Spika (Executive Secretary), N.
Armstrong (Advisory Secretary), Dr. I. Bowmer, Dr. G. De Serres, Dr. P.
DeWals, Dr. J. Embree, Dr. I. Gemmill, Dr. M. Naus, Dr. P. Orr, Dr. B. Ward,
A. Zierler
Liaison
Representatives: Dr. J. Carsley (CPHA), Dr. G. Delage (CPS), Dr. M. Douville-Fradet
(ACE), Dr. T. Freeman (CFPC), Dr. J. Livengood (CDC), Dr. A.E. McCarthy
(ND), Dr. J. Salzman (CATMAT), Dr. L. Samson (CIDS), Dr. J. Waters (CCMOH).
Ex-Officio
Representatives: Dr. J. Calver (BBR), Dr. A. King (LCDC), Dr. P. Riben (MSB).
This
statement was prepared by Dr. G. De Serres and approved by NACI.
|