Vaccination News Home Page

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/325/7354/22

BMJ
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

Abridged text of this article
PDF [abridged] of this article
Full text of this article
PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Read responses to this article
See related This week in BMJ item
Other related articles in BMJ
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Little, P. || Doust, J.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Children

BMJ 2002;325:22 ( 6 July )
 

Primary care

Predictors of poor outcome and benefits from antibiotics in children with acute otitis media: pragmatic randomised trial

Paul Little, clinician scientista Clare Gould, research assistanta Michael Moore, general practitionerb Greg Warner, general practitionerc Joan Dunleavey, research coordinatora Ian Williamson, senior lecturera

a Community Clinical Sciences (Primary Medical Care Group), University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO15 6ST, b Three Swans Surgery, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP1 1DX, c Nightingale Surgery, Romsey, Hampshire SO51 7QN

Correspondence to: P Little psl3@soton.ac.uk

Objectives: To identify which children with acute otitis media are at risk of poor outcome and to assess benefit from antibiotics in these children.
Design: Secondary analysis of randomised controlled trial cohort.
Setting: Primary care.
Participants: 315 children aged 6 months to 10 years.
Intervention: Immediate or delayed (taken after 72 hours if necessary) antibiotics.
Main outcome measure: Predictors of short term outcome: an episode of distress or night disturbance three days after child saw doctor.
Results: Distress by day three was more likely in children with high temperature (adjusted odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 9.0), vomiting (2.6,1.3 to 5.0), and cough (2.0, 1.1 to 3.8) on day one. Night disturbance by day three was more likely with high temperature 2.4 (1.2 to 4.8), vomiting (2.1,1.1 to 4.0), cough (2.3,1.3 to 4.2), and ear discharge (2.1, 1.2 to 3.9). Among the children with high temperature or vomiting, distress by day three was less likely with immediate antibiotics (32% for immediate v 53% for delayed, chi 2=4.0; P=0.045, number needed to treat 5) as was night disturbance (26% v 59%, chi 2=9.3; P=0.002; number needed to treat 3). In children without higher temperature or vomiting, immediate antibiotics made little difference to distress by day three (15% v 19%, chi 2=0.74; P=0.39) or night disturbance (20% v 27%, chi 2=1.6; P=0.20). Addition of cough did not significantly improve prediction of benefit.
Conclusion: In children with otitis media but without fever and vomiting antibiotic treatment has little benefit and a poor outcome is unlikely.

 

What is already known on this topic
Most children with otitis media will not benefit symptomatically from immediate use of antibiotics

It is unclear which children are more likely to benefit from antibiotics and which features predict poor outcome

What this study adds
Children with high temperature or vomiting were more likely to be distressed or have night disturbance three days after seeing the doctor

Children with high temperature or vomiting were more likely to benefit from antibiotics, although it is still reasonable to wait 24-48 hours as many children will settle anyway

Children without high temperature or vomiting were unlikely to have poor outcome and unlikely to benefit from immediate antibiotics



 

 


© BMJ 2002

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Reticulo-Endothelial-System-Hyperfunction Syndrome.
Sergio Stagnaro
bmj.com, 5 Jul 2002 [Full text]
A faster way to deal with ear infection
wendy m mclean
bmj.com, 8 Jul 2002 [Full text]

Other related articles in BMJ:

EDITOR'S CHOICE
Medical journals and the "real world".
BMJ 2002 325: 0. [Full text]  

 

WEBSITE OF THE WEEK
Website of the week: Ear health.
Claire McKenna
BMJ 2002 325: 50. [Full text]  

 


 

 


Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ Intended for health professionals
 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.